BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

63 results for “reassessment”+ Section 10Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai105Delhi76Chennai63Bangalore49Hyderabad44Kolkata38Jaipur26Cochin21Pune18Lucknow12Ahmedabad12Indore8Karnataka5Cuttack4Visakhapatnam3Rajkot3Surat3Varanasi2Calcutta2Jodhpur2Chandigarh2Raipur1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)103Section 10B92Section 10A68Section 153A58Section 14757Deduction41Section 13230Section 132(4)28Section 14828Addition to Income

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLY FUTURE SOFT PRIVATE LIMITED), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 420/CHNY/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jan 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.420/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2006-07 V. The Acit, Capgemini Technology Corporate Circle-1(1), Services India Ltd., Block 3, ‘C’ Wing, 4Th Floor, Chennai. Capgemini Knowledge Park, Airoli Knowledge Park, Thane Belapur Road, Navi Mumbai- 400 708. [Pan: Aaacf 0482 E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.S.P. ChidambaramFor Respondent: Ms.E. Pavuna Sundari, CIT
Section 10ASection 10A(2)Section 10A(5)Section 143(1)

Section 10B (8) of the IT Act, as observed hereinabove. The present Appeal is accordingly Allowed. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. 8. The decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pr.CIT v. Wipro Ltd., which was rendered with reference to sec.10B

Showing 1–20 of 63 · Page 1 of 4

28
Disallowance27
Reopening of Assessment24

CORNET TECHNOLOGY (INDIA) PVT LTD.,KANCHEEPURAM vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/CHNY/2016[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Sept 2016AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.257, 258 & 259/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2010-11 & 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. R. Balasubramanian, CA &For Respondent: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCIT
Section 10BSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147

Section 10B of the Act. The Ld. representative 3 I.T.A. Nos.257 to 259/Mds/16 placed his reliance on various judgments of High Courts to support his claim. 3. The Ld. representative for the assessee further submitted that for the assessment year 2006-07, the assessee’s one of the grounds was with regard to reassessment

CORNET TECHNOLOGY (INDIA) PVT LTD.,KANCHEEPURAM vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 258/CHNY/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Sept 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.257, 258 & 259/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2010-11 & 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. R. Balasubramanian, CA &For Respondent: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCIT
Section 10BSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147

Section 10B of the Act. The Ld. representative 3 I.T.A. Nos.257 to 259/Mds/16 placed his reliance on various judgments of High Courts to support his claim. 3. The Ld. representative for the assessee further submitted that for the assessment year 2006-07, the assessee’s one of the grounds was with regard to reassessment

CORNET TECHNOLOGY (INDIA) PVT LTD.,KANCHEEPURAM vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 259/CHNY/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Sept 2016AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.257, 258 & 259/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2010-11 & 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. R. Balasubramanian, CA &For Respondent: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCIT
Section 10BSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147

Section 10B of the Act. The Ld. representative 3 I.T.A. Nos.257 to 259/Mds/16 placed his reliance on various judgments of High Courts to support his claim. 3. The Ld. representative for the assessee further submitted that for the assessment year 2006-07, the assessee’s one of the grounds was with regard to reassessment

INDIRA INDUSTRIES,RANIPET vs. ACIT, VELLORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1262/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1262/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2009-10 M/S. Indira Industries, The Assistant Commissioner Of No. 6, Sipcot Industrial Complex, Vs. Income Tax, Ranipet 632 403, Tamil Nadu. Circle 1, Vellore. [Pan: Aaafi2440N] (Appellant) (Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Seetharaman, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 28.12.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.01.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

For Appellant: Shri G. Seetharaman, C.AFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 10BSection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148

10B of the Act, he believed that the said interest income escaped assessment, which is to be taxed under the head “income from other sources”. Accordingly, by recording the reasons for escapement of income under section 147 of the Act, the Assessing Officer issued notice under section 148 of the Act for reopening of assessment within the time prescribed

DCIT, DINDIGUL vs. BNAZRUM AGRO EXPORTS (P) LTD., DINDIGUL

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes and the cross-objection of the assessee is dismissed as not pressed

ITA 485/CHNY/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.485/Mds/2015 & C.O. No.41/Mds/2015 (In I.T.A. No.485/Mds/2015) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Bnazrum Agro Exports (P) Ltd., Income Tax, V. Sirumalai Road, Erandalaparai, Circle – I, Dindigul. Rettiarpatti Post, Dindigul – 624 006. Pan : Aabcb 2418 B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent & Cross-Objector)

For Appellant: Shri R. Duraipandian, JCITFor Respondent: Shri R. Kumar, Advocate
Section 10BSection 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

Section 10B of the Act. The assessee has also challenged the validity of issue of notice for reassessment and prayed

ST. JOHN FREIGHT SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.,,TUTUCORIN vs. DCIT, CC-1,, MADURAI

In the result appeals filed in ITA Nos

ITA 2900/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Arun Khodpia, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.188 & 2898 To 2900/Chny/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2010-11 V. M/S.St.John Freight – The Dy. Commissioner- Systems Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, C-98, Sipcot Complex, Central Circle-1, Harbour Express Road, Madurai. Tuticorin-628 008. [Pan:Aaacs 4697 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.04.2023

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, CIT
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 80ASection 80I

10B shall be allowed to an assessee, who does not furnish a return of his income on or before the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139. Similarly, with a view to enforce the compliance for furnishing the ration of income by the due date by the assessees who are entitled for deductions under section

ST. JOHN FREIGHT SYSTEMS LTD.,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, MADURAI

In the result appeals filed in ITA Nos

ITA 2898/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Apr 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Arun Khodpia, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.188 & 2898 To 2900/Chny/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2010-11 V. M/S.St.John Freight – The Dy. Commissioner- Systems Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, C-98, Sipcot Complex, Central Circle-1, Harbour Express Road, Madurai. Tuticorin-628 008. [Pan:Aaacs 4697 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.04.2023

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, CIT
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 80ASection 80I

10B shall be allowed to an assessee, who does not furnish a return of his income on or before the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139. Similarly, with a view to enforce the compliance for furnishing the ration of income by the due date by the assessees who are entitled for deductions under section

ST. JOHN FREIGHT SYSTEMS LTD.,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, MADURAI

In the result appeals filed in ITA Nos

ITA 188/CHNY/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Apr 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Arun Khodpia, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.188 & 2898 To 2900/Chny/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2010-11 V. M/S.St.John Freight – The Dy. Commissioner- Systems Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, C-98, Sipcot Complex, Central Circle-1, Harbour Express Road, Madurai. Tuticorin-628 008. [Pan:Aaacs 4697 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.04.2023

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, CIT
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 80ASection 80I

10B shall be allowed to an assessee, who does not furnish a return of his income on or before the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139. Similarly, with a view to enforce the compliance for furnishing the ration of income by the due date by the assessees who are entitled for deductions under section

ST. JOHN FREIGHT SYSTEMS LTD.,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, MADURAI

In the result appeals filed in ITA Nos

ITA 2899/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Arun Khodpia, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.188 & 2898 To 2900/Chny/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2010-11 V. M/S.St.John Freight – The Dy. Commissioner- Systems Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, C-98, Sipcot Complex, Central Circle-1, Harbour Express Road, Madurai. Tuticorin-628 008. [Pan:Aaacs 4697 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.04.2023

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, CIT
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 80ASection 80I

10B shall be allowed to an assessee, who does not furnish a return of his income on or before the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139. Similarly, with a view to enforce the compliance for furnishing the ration of income by the due date by the assessees who are entitled for deductions under section

FICHTNER CONSULTING ENGINEERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT (OSD) CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 959/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 959/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Fichtner Consulting Assistant Commissioner Of Engineers (India) Pvt Ltd., V. Income Tax (Osd), No. 165, 9Th Floor, Menon Corporate Circle -2, Eternity St. Mary’S Road, Chennai – 600 034. Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. [Pan: Aaacf-5620-Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.10.2023

For Appellant: Shri. N. Arjun Raj, CAFor Respondent: Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10ASection 10BSection 143(3)Section 147

section 143(3) and all material facts were placed before Assessing officer and the same issue cannot be disallowed for subsequent years The Reassessment proceedings consequent to a change of opinion by the succeeding Assessing Officer on the same set of facts without any 'fresh information' is illegal and deserved to be cancelled. 2. Validity of STPI approval for 10B

EH BUILDING CONSULTANCY PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORP CIR 2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 578/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 147

reassessment proceedings, the AO questioned the allowability under Section 10A of the Act on the following two grounds: (a) The date of commencement of the business; and (b) Inconip1ete Form 56G. c) The appellant thereafter made an alternative claim under Section 10B

FAIVELEY TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD.,HOSUR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1598/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri. Ashik Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80

10B or section 10BA or under any provision of this Chapter under the heading "C.-Deductions in respect of certain incomes", no deduction shall be allowed to him thereunder" 4. The Company furnished the Income Tax Return within the applicable due date of 30th November, 2018. Please find attached the ITR acknowledgement in this regard. (Annexure 1) 5. Further

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR M/S. MASCON GLOBAL LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION), CHENNAI

Accordingly, the ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 632/CHNY/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment order] and 2009-10 were also initiated and against the appellate orders, the Revenue preferred further appeals before the Tribunal. Now, we shall take Revenue appeals, in which assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act was passed. 8 I.T.A. No.1139/Chny/08, 1135/Chny/10 & C.O. No. 69/Chny/17, 1136/Chny/10 & 632-634/Chny/17 I.T.A. No. 1139/Chny/2008 [AY 2003-04] 3.1 The first

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR M/S. MASCON GLOBAL LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION), CHENNAI

Accordingly, the ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 634/CHNY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment order] and 2009-10 were also initiated and against the appellate orders, the Revenue preferred further appeals before the Tribunal. Now, we shall take Revenue appeals, in which assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act was passed. 8 I.T.A. No.1139/Chny/08, 1135/Chny/10 & C.O. No. 69/Chny/17, 1136/Chny/10 & 632-634/Chny/17 I.T.A. No. 1139/Chny/2008 [AY 2003-04] 3.1 The first

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR M/S. MASCON GLOBAL LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION), CHENNAI

Accordingly, the ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 633/CHNY/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment order] and 2009-10 were also initiated and against the appellate orders, the Revenue preferred further appeals before the Tribunal. Now, we shall take Revenue appeals, in which assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act was passed. 8 I.T.A. No.1139/Chny/08, 1135/Chny/10 & C.O. No. 69/Chny/17, 1136/Chny/10 & 632-634/Chny/17 I.T.A. No. 1139/Chny/2008 [AY 2003-04] 3.1 The first

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. MASCON GLOBAL LTD., CHENNAI

Accordingly, the ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1139/CHNY/2008[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment order] and 2009-10 were also initiated and against the appellate orders, the Revenue preferred further appeals before the Tribunal. Now, we shall take Revenue appeals, in which assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act was passed. 8 I.T.A. No.1139/Chny/08, 1135/Chny/10 & C.O. No. 69/Chny/17, 1136/Chny/10 & 632-634/Chny/17 I.T.A. No. 1139/Chny/2008 [AY 2003-04] 3.1 The first

CONGRUENT SOLUTIONS P LTD. ,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2) , CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for 6

ITA 1798/CHNY/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Dec 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. B. Sagadevan, IRS, JCIT
Section 10ASection 10BSection 14Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148

10B of the Act deduction under that Section was available only where an undertaking was approved as 100% EOU by a Board appointed by the Central Government for this purpose under section 14 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. As per the ld. Authorised Representative, assessee having recognized the above mistake, had in the return filed pursuant

M/S BEACH MINERAALS COMPANY,TIRUNELVELI KUTTAM KUTTAM B.O. vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , MADURAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 366/CHNY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 366/Chny/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Beach Minerals Company 125, Triuchendur Road, Tirunelveli Kuttam, Kuttam B.O. 627 651 Tamil Nadu. Pan : Aajfb3329C .......अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Madurai. ……प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 532/Chny/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Madurai. .......अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. M/S. Beach Minerals Company 125, Triuchendur Road

For Appellant: Mr. Arjun Raj, CAFor Respondent: Mr. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

Section 10B benefits were compared. The Ld. CIT-DR reiterated all facts which were reported by the A.O in his order and has vehemently relied upon the same. 9. Carrying the arguments further, the Ld. CIT-DR drew our attention to the CIT(Appeals)’s order and read the observations, placing revenue’s intense objections on the same

DCIT, MADURAI vs. M/S BEACH MINERAALS COMPANY, TIRUNELVELI CHENNAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 532/CHNY/2023[2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2023

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 366/Chny/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Beach Minerals Company 125, Triuchendur Road, Tirunelveli Kuttam, Kuttam B.O. 627 651 Tamil Nadu. Pan : Aajfb3329C .......अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Madurai. ……प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 532/Chny/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Madurai. .......अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. M/S. Beach Minerals Company 125, Triuchendur Road

For Appellant: Mr. Arjun Raj, CAFor Respondent: Mr. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

Section 10B benefits were compared. The Ld. CIT-DR reiterated all facts which were reported by the A.O in his order and has vehemently relied upon the same. 9. Carrying the arguments further, the Ld. CIT-DR drew our attention to the CIT(Appeals)’s order and read the observations, placing revenue’s intense objections on the same