BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

196 results for “reassessment”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,616Delhi605Kolkata315Ahmedabad311Jaipur213Chennai196Bangalore177Pune161Hyderabad150Chandigarh147Raipur124Surat85Rajkot76Visakhapatnam71Indore71Amritsar65Guwahati53Patna50Cuttack44Nagpur43Lucknow38Cochin29Allahabad16Dehradun14SC13Agra11Jodhpur10Karnataka9Ranchi6Orissa4Jabalpur4Telangana4Kerala3Varanasi3Panaji2Calcutta1Punjab & Haryana1Rajasthan1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)100Section 153A82Section 14859Section 14744Addition to Income37Section 26335Section 10B35Reopening of Assessment33Disallowance32

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI vs. N RAMASAMY, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 128/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.Gआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.127 & 128/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2015-2016 & 2016-2017 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri. N. Ramasamy, Income Tax, No.14/19, Saraswathi Street, Central Circle 2(2), Mahaingapuram, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Adupr 8003P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2023. घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.12.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh:

For Appellant: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CITFor Respondent: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 143Section 143(3)

loss claimed in the return of income u/s.153A is to be carried forward, by observing that the return of income filed in response to notice u/s.153A is treated as filed u/s.139(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 6.2. The Learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that in the case of CIT v. Sun Engineering Works

Showing 1–20 of 196 · Page 1 of 10

...
Reassessment26
Deduction24
Depreciation18

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI vs. N RAMASAMY, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 127/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.Gआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A Nos.127 & 128/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2015-2016 & 2016-2017 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri. N. Ramasamy, Income Tax, No.14/19, Saraswathi Street, Central Circle 2(2), Mahaingapuram, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Adupr 8003P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2023. घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.12.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh:

For Appellant: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CITFor Respondent: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 143Section 143(3)

loss claimed in the return of income u/s.153A is to be carried forward, by observing that the return of income filed in response to notice u/s.153A is treated as filed u/s.139(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 6.2. The Learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that in the case of CIT v. Sun Engineering Works

M/S. THE INDIA CEMENTS LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 833/CHNY/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunatha

For Appellant: Mr. S.Bharath,CITFor Respondent: 13.07.2021
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 263

carried forward losses or unabsorbed depreciation, while computing book profit u/s.115JB of the Act in the original proceedings u/s.143(3), as well as reassessment

TITAN COMPANY LIMITED,HOSUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - LTU 2 (IC), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal raised by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1742/CHNY/2024[2011- 12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1742/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2011-12 Titan Company Limited, Assistant Commissioner Of No.3, Sipcot Industrial Complex, Income Tax, Hosur, Krishnagiri, Ltu-2, Tamil Nadu-635126 Chennai [Pan: Aaact5131A] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri Abhay Kumar, C.A अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Ms.Komali Krishna, Cit प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10.09.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.12.2024

For Appellant: Ms.Komali Krishna, CIT
Section 147Section 250Section 80Section 80C(2)(a)Section 80I

carried forward to AY 2011-12 for set off is accepted, it will render the above non obstante provisions of section 801A(5), providing the eligible unit to be deemed as the only source of income of the assessee, as nugatory and therefore any such interpretation is bound to be rejected as the same cannot be the intent

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD), CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S CASAGRAND BUILDER PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

Appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 720/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.720/Chny/2023 (िनधा*रणवष* / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Jcit(Osd) M/S. Casagrand Premier Builder Limited बनाम Corporate Circle-1(1) (Earlier Known As M/S Casa Grand Builder P. Ltd.) 5Th Floor, Npl Devi, New No.111, Old No.59. Lb Chennai. / Vs. Road, Thiruvanmiyur,Chennai-600 041 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaccc-2758-A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Revenue By : Mrs. Swapna Nanu Ambath & Sh. V. Nanda Kumar Ld. Cit-Drs A/W Shri D. Hema Bhupal (Jcit) – Ld. Sr. Dr " थ" की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri B. Ramakrishnan (Ca) - Ld.Ar

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan (CA) - Ld.ARFor Respondent: Mrs. Swapna Nanu Ambath & Sh. V. Nanda
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 72

carry forward loss could not be adjudicated on standalone basis. The AO should have first reassessed the allowability of loss

BHARAT TECHNOLOGIES AUTO COMPONENTS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, COMPANY WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 1841/CHNY/2024[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Nov 2024AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1841, 1842 & 1843/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2006-07 V. M/S. Bharat Technologies Auto – The Ito, Components Ltd., Company Ward-1(1), 177 Raheja Towers, Chennai. 7Th Floor, Unit No.708, Beta Wing, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. [Pan: Aabcb 9835 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 41(1)(b)Section 72ASection 72A(2)

carry forward accumulated ITA Nos.1841, 1842 & 1843/Chny/2024 (AYs 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2006-07) M/s. Bharat Technologies – Auto Components Ltd. :: 9 :: business losses and unabsorbed depreciation of UPSL; to consider to exempt the company from the provisions of Sec.41(1) & Sec.43B of the Act, etc, which are the subject matter of grounds of appeal before this Tribunal. According

BHARAT TECHNOLOGIES AUTO COMPONENTS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, COMPANY WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 1842/CHNY/2024[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Nov 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1841, 1842 & 1843/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2006-07 V. M/S. Bharat Technologies Auto – The Ito, Components Ltd., Company Ward-1(1), 177 Raheja Towers, Chennai. 7Th Floor, Unit No.708, Beta Wing, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. [Pan: Aabcb 9835 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 41(1)(b)Section 72ASection 72A(2)

carry forward accumulated ITA Nos.1841, 1842 & 1843/Chny/2024 (AYs 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2006-07) M/s. Bharat Technologies – Auto Components Ltd. :: 9 :: business losses and unabsorbed depreciation of UPSL; to consider to exempt the company from the provisions of Sec.41(1) & Sec.43B of the Act, etc, which are the subject matter of grounds of appeal before this Tribunal. According

BHARAT TECHNOLOGIES AUTO COMPONENTS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, COMPANY WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 1843/CHNY/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Nov 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1841, 1842 & 1843/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2006-07 V. M/S. Bharat Technologies Auto – The Ito, Components Ltd., Company Ward-1(1), 177 Raheja Towers, Chennai. 7Th Floor, Unit No.708, Beta Wing, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. [Pan: Aabcb 9835 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 41(1)(b)Section 72ASection 72A(2)

carry forward accumulated ITA Nos.1841, 1842 & 1843/Chny/2024 (AYs 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2006-07) M/s. Bharat Technologies – Auto Components Ltd. :: 9 :: business losses and unabsorbed depreciation of UPSL; to consider to exempt the company from the provisions of Sec.41(1) & Sec.43B of the Act, etc, which are the subject matter of grounds of appeal before this Tribunal. According

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING (P) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs 2003-04

ITA 1408/CHNY/2016[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2022AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1251 To 1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2003-04 To 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 M/S.International Agricultural- V. The Asst. Commissioner- Processing (P) Ltd., Of Income Tax, 332/5-A, Peranai Road, Company Circle-Ii, Musuvanathu Village, Madurai. Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul-624 219. [Pan: Aaaci 3593 B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Mr.P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment and / or ITA Nos.1251-1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 :: 3 :: b) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B before setting off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation and / or c) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B at 100% and / or d) Pass such other orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit. 3. The brief facts

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING (P) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs 2003-04

ITA 1253/CHNY/2016[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2022AY 2005-2006

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1251 To 1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2003-04 To 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 M/S.International Agricultural- V. The Asst. Commissioner- Processing (P) Ltd., Of Income Tax, 332/5-A, Peranai Road, Company Circle-Ii, Musuvanathu Village, Madurai. Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul-624 219. [Pan: Aaaci 3593 B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Mr.P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment and / or ITA Nos.1251-1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 :: 3 :: b) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B before setting off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation and / or c) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B at 100% and / or d) Pass such other orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit. 3. The brief facts

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING (P) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs 2003-04

ITA 1407/CHNY/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2022AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1251 To 1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2003-04 To 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 M/S.International Agricultural- V. The Asst. Commissioner- Processing (P) Ltd., Of Income Tax, 332/5-A, Peranai Road, Company Circle-Ii, Musuvanathu Village, Madurai. Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul-624 219. [Pan: Aaaci 3593 B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Mr.P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment and / or ITA Nos.1251-1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 :: 3 :: b) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B before setting off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation and / or c) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B at 100% and / or d) Pass such other orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit. 3. The brief facts

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING (P) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs 2003-04

ITA 1251/CHNY/2016[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2022AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1251 To 1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2003-04 To 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 M/S.International Agricultural- V. The Asst. Commissioner- Processing (P) Ltd., Of Income Tax, 332/5-A, Peranai Road, Company Circle-Ii, Musuvanathu Village, Madurai. Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul-624 219. [Pan: Aaaci 3593 B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Mr.P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment and / or ITA Nos.1251-1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 :: 3 :: b) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B before setting off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation and / or c) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B at 100% and / or d) Pass such other orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit. 3. The brief facts

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING (P) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs 2003-04

ITA 1252/CHNY/2016[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2022AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1251 To 1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2003-04 To 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 M/S.International Agricultural- V. The Asst. Commissioner- Processing (P) Ltd., Of Income Tax, 332/5-A, Peranai Road, Company Circle-Ii, Musuvanathu Village, Madurai. Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul-624 219. [Pan: Aaaci 3593 B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Mr.P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment and / or ITA Nos.1251-1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 :: 3 :: b) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B before setting off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation and / or c) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B at 100% and / or d) Pass such other orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit. 3. The brief facts

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING (P) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs 2003-04

ITA 1254/CHNY/2016[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2022AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1251 To 1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2003-04 To 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 M/S.International Agricultural- V. The Asst. Commissioner- Processing (P) Ltd., Of Income Tax, 332/5-A, Peranai Road, Company Circle-Ii, Musuvanathu Village, Madurai. Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul-624 219. [Pan: Aaaci 3593 B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Mr.P.Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment and / or ITA Nos.1251-1254, 1407 & 1408/Chny/2016 :: 3 :: b) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B before setting off of brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation and / or c) Allow the claim of deduction u/s. 10B at 100% and / or d) Pass such other orders as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit. 3. The brief facts

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLY FUTURE SOFT PRIVATE LIMITED), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 420/CHNY/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jan 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.420/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2006-07 V. The Acit, Capgemini Technology Corporate Circle-1(1), Services India Ltd., Block 3, ‘C’ Wing, 4Th Floor, Chennai. Capgemini Knowledge Park, Airoli Knowledge Park, Thane Belapur Road, Navi Mumbai- 400 708. [Pan: Aaacf 0482 E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.S.P. ChidambaramFor Respondent: Ms.E. Pavuna Sundari, CIT
Section 10ASection 10A(2)Section 10A(5)Section 143(1)

carried forward or set- off of any loss. Filing a revised return under Section 139(5) of the IT Act and taking a contrary stand and/or claiming the exemption, which was specifically not claimed earlier while filing the original return of income is not permissible. By filing the revised return of income, the assessee cannot be permitted to substitute

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. MANALI PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross

ITA 1273/CHNY/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Prabhu Mukunth Arun
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 148Section 32(2)

reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer, by following various decisions including the decision of the Tribunal in the case of KMC Speciality Hospitals India Ltd. v. ACIT [2014] taxmann.com 534 (Chennai – Trib], the ld. CIT(A) allowed the ground with regard to set off of unabsorbed depreciation for both the assessment years. 4. Aggrieved, the Revenue is in appeal

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. MANALI PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross

ITA 1272/CHNY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Jan 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Prabhu Mukunth Arun
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 148Section 32(2)

reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer, by following various decisions including the decision of the Tribunal in the case of KMC Speciality Hospitals India Ltd. v. ACIT [2014] taxmann.com 534 (Chennai – Trib], the ld. CIT(A) allowed the ground with regard to set off of unabsorbed depreciation for both the assessment years. 4. Aggrieved, the Revenue is in appeal

SRINIVASA FASHIONS PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos 1965, 1966 & 1967 are

ITA 1965/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968 /Mds/2016 & 2096/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12& 2009-10 M/S. Srinivasa Fashions Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, 1A, Regency Apartments, Vs. Corporate Circle -6(2), No. 5, 1St Lane, Aayakar Bhavan, New Block, 7Th Floor, 121 M.G. Road, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034. Chennai - 600 034. [Pan: Aaics 9511R]

For Appellant: ShriT. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. Bharath, CIT
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 32(1)(ii)Section 47

reassessment is bad in law. 4. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing depreciation to the tune of Rs.89,27,762/-. 5. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the Assessing Officer erred in invoking proviso to section 32(1 )(ii) and holding that

SRINIVASA FASHIONS PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos 1965, 1966 & 1967 are

ITA 1966/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968 /Mds/2016 & 2096/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12& 2009-10 M/S. Srinivasa Fashions Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, 1A, Regency Apartments, Vs. Corporate Circle -6(2), No. 5, 1St Lane, Aayakar Bhavan, New Block, 7Th Floor, 121 M.G. Road, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034. Chennai - 600 034. [Pan: Aaics 9511R]

For Appellant: ShriT. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. Bharath, CIT
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 32(1)(ii)Section 47

reassessment is bad in law. 4. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing depreciation to the tune of Rs.89,27,762/-. 5. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the Assessing Officer erred in invoking proviso to section 32(1 )(ii) and holding that

SRINIVASA FASHIONS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos 1965, 1966 & 1967 are

ITA 2096/CHNY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos. 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968 /Mds/2016 & 2096/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2008-09, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12& 2009-10 M/S. Srinivasa Fashions Pvt. Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, 1A, Regency Apartments, Vs. Corporate Circle -6(2), No. 5, 1St Lane, Aayakar Bhavan, New Block, 7Th Floor, 121 M.G. Road, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034. Chennai - 600 034. [Pan: Aaics 9511R]

For Appellant: ShriT. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. Bharath, CIT
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 32(1)(ii)Section 47

reassessment is bad in law. 4. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing depreciation to the tune of Rs.89,27,762/-. 5. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the Assessing Officer erred in invoking proviso to section 32(1 )(ii) and holding that