BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 801clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai158Karnataka99Delhi86Jaipur55Ahmedabad43Allahabad37Calcutta34Kolkata31Bangalore22Indore13Pune13Hyderabad10Visakhapatnam8Lucknow6Chandigarh6Amritsar5Surat5Guwahati4Chennai2Cochin1Jabalpur1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 2(22)(e)6Section 404Section 250(6)2Section 69C2Section 143(2)2Section 143(3)2Deemed Dividend2TDS2Disallowance2

TVH ENERGY RESOURCES PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3183/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri B. Srinivasa Rao, CITFor Respondent: 14.08.2018
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 250(6)Section 40Section 69C

Section 69C of the Act.. 6.1 Before the Ld.CIT(A) the assessee had made submission that it had neither incurred such cash expenditure nor made such cash payment to sub-contractors. However the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the order of the Ld.AO by observing as under:- While dealing with similar issue for the A.Y.2011-12 in ITA No. 196/16-17 dated

Addition to Income2

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI vs. TVH ENERGY RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3117/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri B. Srinivasa Rao, CITFor Respondent: 14.08.2018
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 250(6)Section 40Section 69C

Section 69C of the Act.. 6.1 Before the Ld.CIT(A) the assessee had made submission that it had neither incurred such cash expenditure nor made such cash payment to sub-contractors. However the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the order of the Ld.AO by observing as under:- While dealing with similar issue for the A.Y.2011-12 in ITA No. 196/16-17 dated