Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 44Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai20 Bangalore8 Delhi4 Kolkata3 Chennai3 Patna2 Jaipur2 Jodhpur1 Cochin1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)10 Section 271(1)(c)3 Penalty3 Section 143(2)2 Section 271B2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2

N.SETHUMADHAVAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2574/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri. G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 2574/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2009-10 N. Sethumadhavan, The Income Tax Officer, No 594, Alagiri Samy Salai, Vs. Non Corporate Ward 14(1), K.K. Nagar, Chennai. Chennai - 600 078. [ Pan: Amrps 6175K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCIT

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 271(1)(c)Section 44B

section 44B of the Act, the Assessee filed Audited financial statements and Tax Audit Report in Form 3CB and 3CD and the Return of income was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act was issued along with questionnaire. In compliance

N.SETHUMADHAVAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

N.SETHUMADHAVAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

P.SENTHIL KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

P.SENTHIL KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI