BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai171Delhi161Bangalore60Raipur42Ahmedabad39Kolkata22Jaipur22Pune20Indore15Visakhapatnam13Hyderabad10Nagpur7Surat7Chennai7Chandigarh7Lucknow5Panaji3Jodhpur1Dehradun1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9Section 2746Section 271(1)(d)6Section 43B5Disallowance5Section 143(2)4Section 143(3)4Penalty4Addition to Income4

PRESIDENCY KID LEATHER PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 765/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Apr 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 765/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2013-14 Presidency Kid Leather Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of 21, Spartan Nagar, 1St Floor, Vs. Income Tax, Mogappair East, Chennai 600 037. Corporate Circle 5(2), [Pan:Aaacp1952D] Chennai 34. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Abani Kanta Nayak, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.03.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 19.04.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 3, Chennai, Dated 31.01.2017 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2013-14 Challenging The Appellate Order Of Confirming The Levy Of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abani Kanta Nayak, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961, should not be made. We hereby state that we have filed True and correct Return of Income. We have not concealed nor had given any in accurate particulars.” 6. At the first instance, while replying to the penalty show-cause notice dated 28.12.2015, the assessee has not protested that

Section 142(1)3
Deduction3
Section 2712

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. BEST & CROMPTON ENGINEERING LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, Revenue appeal is dismissed

ITA 2785/CHNY/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Mar 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Shiva Srinivas, JCITFor Respondent: None
Section 115WSection 271(1)(d)Section 43BSection 44A

43B of the Act from the computation of total income. The Ld. AO is of the opinion that the claim in the computation of income is equal to claim made the profit & loss account and such expenditure is liable to fringe benefit tax and with these observations the Ld. AO has initiated penalty proceedings u/s. 271

TROPICAL STONES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1214/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Feb 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri S. S. Godara] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1214/Mds/2014 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Anand dev Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Guru Bhashyam, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)Section 274Section 43BSection 68

43B VAT payable of ` 58,420/-, manufacturing/pooja/ advertisement expenses of ` 22,53,443/-, unsecured loans of ` 48.70 lakhs, secured loan of ` 96.25 lakhs and interest expenditure of ` 6,96,952/- for want I.T.A.No.1214/14 :- 3 -: of necessary details by invoking section 68 of the Act. The assessee’s total taxable income stood assessed at ` 1,04,31,055/- as against

ROCA BATHROOM PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

The appeal stand partly allowed to the extent indicated in the order

ITA 2976/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri N. V. Balaji (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Dr. S. Palanikumar (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

section 43B of the Act. 8. Erred in law and on facts in Initiating penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act 8.1 Erred

ORDAIN HEALTH CARE GLOBAL PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE -5(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 211/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Dec 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 211/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Ordain Health Care The Dcit, Global Pvt. Ltd., V. Corporate Circle – 5(1), Khivraj Complex Ii, Fourth Floor Chennai - 34 No.480, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. Pan: Aabco5860A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri R. Sandeep Bagmar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anitha,Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 10.11.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 02.12.2020

For Appellant: Shri R. Sandeep Bagmar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha,JCIT
Section 194Section 250(6)Section 271Section 32Section 43B

penalty proceedings under section 271(1 )(c) of the Act without appreciating that there was no failure on the part of the Appellant in complying with notices during the course of assessment proceedings or any attempt to conceal income / furnish inaccurate particulars of income. 6. Relief 6.1 The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend and/Or withdraw the above ground

BANNARIAMMAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(2), CHENNAI

ITA 3314/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Aug 2025AY 2021-22
For Appellant: Mr.Vikram VijayaraghavanFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivasan, CIT/DR
Section 12ASection 132Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 153CSection 250

u/s 131 of the Act and his statement \nwas recorded on 26.07.2021. In this statement, he was particularly \ninterrogated regarding the impugned notings which he had originally \nalleged to relate to ‘Bannari Amman Group’ / ‘Bannari Amman Sugars’ / \n‘Bannari Amman Educational Trust’ and he was required to specifically \n\nITA Nos.3310 to 3314/Chny/2024

BANNARIAMMAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(2), CHENNAI

ITA 3311/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Aug 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Mr.Vikram VijayaraghavanFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivasan, CIT/DR
Section 12ASection 132Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 153CSection 250

u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the\ncase of M/s Chettinadu Lignite Transport Service Private Limited, at the above\nmentioned address. The sworn statement was deposed before, Shri. S.\nBharathi, IRS, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2,\nCoimbatore.\nITA Nos.3310 to 3314/Chny/2024\n(AYs 2017-18 to 2021-22)\nITA Nos.3353 & 3354 to 3358/Chny/2024