BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

39 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 364clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai165Delhi154Karnataka99Jaipur52Chennai39Calcutta34Ahmedabad25Chandigarh23Raipur21Indore18Lucknow17Bangalore17Hyderabad16Surat11Agra5Pune4SC2Telangana2Kolkata2Cochin1Jodhpur1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)28Penalty26Addition to Income24Section 14815Section 143(3)13Section 271(1)12Survey u/s 133A11Section 133A8Section 263

GAYATHRI DEVI VYAS, D.SRINIVAS VYAS MANOHAR VYAS VIJAY SHRI LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SHRI DURGA DAS VYAS,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 12(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by both the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2695/CHNY/2018[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2691 & 2692/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2001-02 & 2002-03 Shri D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 1, D Block, Eashwaran Koil Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Street, West Mambalam, Chennai. Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Abvpv4760G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2693, 2694, 2695, 2696, 2697 & 2698/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:1998-99, 99-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 Gayathri Devi Vyas, D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Manohar Vyas, Vijay Shri, Legal Heirs Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Of Late Shri Durga Das Vyas, No. 1, D Chennai. Block, Eashwaran Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Adapv2591C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate & Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Appeals Filed By The Two Different Assessees Are Directed Against The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 271(1)(c)

364 of the paperbook] whether he initiated penalty proceeding for concealing the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. This Tribunal is. of the considered opinion that the assesses shall be given an opportunity to explain why penalty should not be levied before passing the order. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is incumbent upon to specify

Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2

8
Natural Justice8
Section 1477
Section 16

GAYATHRI DEVI VYAS, D.SRINIVAS VYAS MANOHAR VYAS VIJAY SHRI LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SHRI DURGA DAS VYAS,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 12(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by both the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2698/CHNY/2018[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2691 & 2692/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2001-02 & 2002-03 Shri D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 1, D Block, Eashwaran Koil Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Street, West Mambalam, Chennai. Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Abvpv4760G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2693, 2694, 2695, 2696, 2697 & 2698/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:1998-99, 99-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 Gayathri Devi Vyas, D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Manohar Vyas, Vijay Shri, Legal Heirs Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Of Late Shri Durga Das Vyas, No. 1, D Chennai. Block, Eashwaran Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Adapv2591C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate & Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Appeals Filed By The Two Different Assessees Are Directed Against The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 271(1)(c)

364 of the paperbook] whether he initiated penalty proceeding for concealing the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. This Tribunal is. of the considered opinion that the assesses shall be given an opportunity to explain why penalty should not be levied before passing the order. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is incumbent upon to specify

GAYATHRI DEVI VYAS, D.SRINIVAS VYAS MANOHAR VYAS VIJAY SHRI LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SHRI DURGA DAS VYAS,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 12(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by both the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2694/CHNY/2018[1999-00]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 1999-00

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2691 & 2692/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2001-02 & 2002-03 Shri D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 1, D Block, Eashwaran Koil Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Street, West Mambalam, Chennai. Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Abvpv4760G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2693, 2694, 2695, 2696, 2697 & 2698/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:1998-99, 99-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 Gayathri Devi Vyas, D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Manohar Vyas, Vijay Shri, Legal Heirs Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Of Late Shri Durga Das Vyas, No. 1, D Chennai. Block, Eashwaran Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Adapv2591C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate & Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Appeals Filed By The Two Different Assessees Are Directed Against The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 271(1)(c)

364 of the paperbook] whether he initiated penalty proceeding for concealing the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. This Tribunal is. of the considered opinion that the assesses shall be given an opportunity to explain why penalty should not be levied before passing the order. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is incumbent upon to specify

GAYATHRI DEVI VYAS, D.SRINIVAS VYAS MANOHAR VYAS VIJAY SHRI LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SHRI DURGA DAS VYAS,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 12(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by both the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2693/CHNY/2018[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 1998-99

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2691 & 2692/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2001-02 & 2002-03 Shri D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 1, D Block, Eashwaran Koil Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Street, West Mambalam, Chennai. Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Abvpv4760G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2693, 2694, 2695, 2696, 2697 & 2698/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:1998-99, 99-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 Gayathri Devi Vyas, D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Manohar Vyas, Vijay Shri, Legal Heirs Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Of Late Shri Durga Das Vyas, No. 1, D Chennai. Block, Eashwaran Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Adapv2591C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate & Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Appeals Filed By The Two Different Assessees Are Directed Against The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 271(1)(c)

364 of the paperbook] whether he initiated penalty proceeding for concealing the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. This Tribunal is. of the considered opinion that the assesses shall be given an opportunity to explain why penalty should not be levied before passing the order. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is incumbent upon to specify

GAYATHRI DEVI VYAS, D.SRINIVAS VYAS MANOHAR VYAS VIJAY SHRI LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SHRI DURGA DAS VYAS,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 12(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by both the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2697/CHNY/2018[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2691 & 2692/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2001-02 & 2002-03 Shri D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 1, D Block, Eashwaran Koil Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Street, West Mambalam, Chennai. Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Abvpv4760G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2693, 2694, 2695, 2696, 2697 & 2698/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:1998-99, 99-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 Gayathri Devi Vyas, D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Manohar Vyas, Vijay Shri, Legal Heirs Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Of Late Shri Durga Das Vyas, No. 1, D Chennai. Block, Eashwaran Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Adapv2591C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate & Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Appeals Filed By The Two Different Assessees Are Directed Against The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 271(1)(c)

364 of the paperbook] whether he initiated penalty proceeding for concealing the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. This Tribunal is. of the considered opinion that the assesses shall be given an opportunity to explain why penalty should not be levied before passing the order. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is incumbent upon to specify

D.SRINIVAS VYAS,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 12(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by both the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2692/CHNY/2018[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2691 & 2692/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2001-02 & 2002-03 Shri D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 1, D Block, Eashwaran Koil Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Street, West Mambalam, Chennai. Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Abvpv4760G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2693, 2694, 2695, 2696, 2697 & 2698/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:1998-99, 99-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 Gayathri Devi Vyas, D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Manohar Vyas, Vijay Shri, Legal Heirs Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Of Late Shri Durga Das Vyas, No. 1, D Chennai. Block, Eashwaran Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Adapv2591C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate & Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Appeals Filed By The Two Different Assessees Are Directed Against The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 271(1)(c)

364 of the paperbook] whether he initiated penalty proceeding for concealing the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. This Tribunal is. of the considered opinion that the assesses shall be given an opportunity to explain why penalty should not be levied before passing the order. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is incumbent upon to specify

GAYATHRI DEVI VYAS, D.SRINIVAS VYAS MANOHAR VYAS VIJAY SHRI LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SHRI DURGA DAS VYAS,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 12(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by both the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2696/CHNY/2018[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2691 & 2692/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2001-02 & 2002-03 Shri D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 1, D Block, Eashwaran Koil Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Street, West Mambalam, Chennai. Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Abvpv4760G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2693, 2694, 2695, 2696, 2697 & 2698/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:1998-99, 99-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 Gayathri Devi Vyas, D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Manohar Vyas, Vijay Shri, Legal Heirs Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Of Late Shri Durga Das Vyas, No. 1, D Chennai. Block, Eashwaran Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Adapv2591C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate & Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Appeals Filed By The Two Different Assessees Are Directed Against The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 271(1)(c)

364 of the paperbook] whether he initiated penalty proceeding for concealing the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. This Tribunal is. of the considered opinion that the assesses shall be given an opportunity to explain why penalty should not be levied before passing the order. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is incumbent upon to specify

D.SRINIVAS VYAS,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 12(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by both the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2691/CHNY/2018[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2022AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2691 & 2692/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2001-02 & 2002-03 Shri D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 1, D Block, Eashwaran Koil Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Street, West Mambalam, Chennai. Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Abvpv4760G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2693, 2694, 2695, 2696, 2697 & 2698/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:1998-99, 99-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 Gayathri Devi Vyas, D. Srinivas Vyas, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Manohar Vyas, Vijay Shri, Legal Heirs Non Corporate Ward 12(5), Of Late Shri Durga Das Vyas, No. 1, D Chennai. Block, Eashwaran Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. [Pan:Adapv2591C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate & Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: These Appeals Filed By The Two Different Assessees Are Directed Against The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 271(1)(c)

364 of the paperbook] whether he initiated penalty proceeding for concealing the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of such income. This Tribunal is. of the considered opinion that the assesses shall be given an opportunity to explain why penalty should not be levied before passing the order. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is incumbent upon to specify

THE TAMILNADU CIRCLE POSTAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. (1031),,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-12(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3002/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.3002/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. The Tamilnadu Circle Postal Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Cooperative Bank Ltd. (1031), Income Tax, 18/19, Postal Bank, Jahangir Street, Non Corporate Circle 12(1), Second Line Beach, Chennai 600 001. Greams Road, Chennai 600 006. [Pan:Aaaat4900D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Rajagopalan, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Mrs. L. Jancy Elizabeth Rani, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 28.06.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03.08.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 13, Chennai, Dated 21.08.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2008-09 Challenging Levy Of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri S. Rajagopalan, C.AFor Respondent: Mrs. L. Jancy Elizabeth Rani, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)

u/s 36(i)(viia) does not applicable to the assessee- Bank ". Notice under section 143(2) of the Act was issued for calling details in support of the deduction claimed under section 36(1)(viia) of the Act. After examining the details furnished by the assessee, the Assessing Officer has observed that the assessee has made provision for Bad & Doubtful

IRIS ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1437/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1437/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 M/S. Iris Engineering Industries Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., (Now Known As M/S. Ravilla Vs. Income Tax, Corporate Circle 2, Aerospace Industries P. Ltd.), No. 178, Coimbatore. Aerodrome Road, Singanallur, Coimbatore 641 005. [Pan:Aaaci8996G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Dr. S. Palani Kumar, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 21.03.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.06.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao,: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 1, Coimbatore Dated 31.03.2017 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13 In Confirming The Levy Of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar, CIT
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

Section 271(1)(c) by not filing the return u/s 139 duly disclosing the particulars of capital gains chargeable to tax for Asst. Year 2012-13. 6. Further, the assessee claims that the company was voluntarily planning to approach the income tax department and seek its guidance as to how to file the return of income after passage

DCIT, VILLUPURAM vs. D.SANTHA, KALLAKURICHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1803/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nataraja, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10, respectively. 2. Smt. D. Santha, the assessee, an individual has been carrying on business in jewellery apart from pawn broking. For assessment year 2008-09, she did not file her return within the due date ie., 31.07.2008. On 16.03.2009, a survey was carried

D.SHANTHA,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1828/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nataraja, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10, respectively. 2. Smt. D. Santha, the assessee, an individual has been carrying on business in jewellery apart from pawn broking. For assessment year 2008-09, she did not file her return within the due date ie., 31.07.2008. On 16.03.2009, a survey was carried

D.SHANTHA,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1593/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nataraja, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10, respectively. 2. Smt. D. Santha, the assessee, an individual has been carrying on business in jewellery apart from pawn broking. For assessment year 2008-09, she did not file her return within the due date ie., 31.07.2008. On 16.03.2009, a survey was carried

D.SHANTHA,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1829/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Nataraja, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10, respectively. 2. Smt. D. Santha, the assessee, an individual has been carrying on business in jewellery apart from pawn broking. For assessment year 2008-09, she did not file her return within the due date ie., 31.07.2008. On 16.03.2009, a survey was carried

RAMASAMY JAGADISHKUMAR,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as under:-

ITA 2735/CHNY/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Dec 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2734/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2007-8 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2735/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2009-10 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2736/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2010-11 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2737/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2011-12 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2738/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2012-13 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2739/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2013-14 Ramasamy Jagadishkumar, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Old No.5, New No.41, Vs. Tax, Post Office Road, Central Circle-1, Krishnasamy Nagar, Coimbatore Coimbatore-641045 [Pan: Acapj0483C] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri S.Sridhar, Advocate अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.V.Aswathy, Jcit : 17.12.2024 सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing घोर्णध की तधरीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2024

For Respondent: Ms.V.Aswathy, JCIT
Section 1Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)

section 1 ITA-2734 / 2007-08 271(1)(c ) DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / Ramasamy 2023-24 / 1055464745(1) Jagadishkumar, Chny / 2024 ACIT dated 28.08.2023 Old No.5, Central 2 ITA-2735 / 2009-10 144 r.w.s. DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / New No.41, 147 2023-24 / 1055465025(1) Circle-1, Chny / 2024 Post Office dated 28.08.2023 Coim- 271

RAMASAMY JAGADISHKUMAR,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as under:-

ITA 2736/CHNY/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Dec 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2734/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2007-8 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2735/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2009-10 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2736/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2010-11 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2737/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2011-12 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2738/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2012-13 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2739/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2013-14 Ramasamy Jagadishkumar, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Old No.5, New No.41, Vs. Tax, Post Office Road, Central Circle-1, Krishnasamy Nagar, Coimbatore Coimbatore-641045 [Pan: Acapj0483C] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri S.Sridhar, Advocate अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.V.Aswathy, Jcit : 17.12.2024 सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing घोर्णध की तधरीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2024

For Respondent: Ms.V.Aswathy, JCIT
Section 1Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)

section 1 ITA-2734 / 2007-08 271(1)(c ) DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / Ramasamy 2023-24 / 1055464745(1) Jagadishkumar, Chny / 2024 ACIT dated 28.08.2023 Old No.5, Central 2 ITA-2735 / 2009-10 144 r.w.s. DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / New No.41, 147 2023-24 / 1055465025(1) Circle-1, Chny / 2024 Post Office dated 28.08.2023 Coim- 271

RAMASAMY JAGADISHKUMAR,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as under:-

ITA 2739/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2734/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2007-8 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2735/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2009-10 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2736/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2010-11 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2737/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2011-12 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2738/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2012-13 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2739/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2013-14 Ramasamy Jagadishkumar, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Old No.5, New No.41, Vs. Tax, Post Office Road, Central Circle-1, Krishnasamy Nagar, Coimbatore Coimbatore-641045 [Pan: Acapj0483C] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri S.Sridhar, Advocate अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.V.Aswathy, Jcit : 17.12.2024 सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing घोर्णध की तधरीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2024

For Respondent: Ms.V.Aswathy, JCIT
Section 1Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)

section 1 ITA-2734 / 2007-08 271(1)(c ) DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / Ramasamy 2023-24 / 1055464745(1) Jagadishkumar, Chny / 2024 ACIT dated 28.08.2023 Old No.5, Central 2 ITA-2735 / 2009-10 144 r.w.s. DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / New No.41, 147 2023-24 / 1055465025(1) Circle-1, Chny / 2024 Post Office dated 28.08.2023 Coim- 271

RAMASAMY JAGADISHKUMAR,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as under:-

ITA 2734/CHNY/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Dec 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2734/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2007-8 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2735/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2009-10 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2736/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2010-11 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2737/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2011-12 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2738/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2012-13 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2739/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2013-14 Ramasamy Jagadishkumar, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Old No.5, New No.41, Vs. Tax, Post Office Road, Central Circle-1, Krishnasamy Nagar, Coimbatore Coimbatore-641045 [Pan: Acapj0483C] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri S.Sridhar, Advocate अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.V.Aswathy, Jcit : 17.12.2024 सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing घोर्णध की तधरीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2024

For Respondent: Ms.V.Aswathy, JCIT
Section 1Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)

section 1 ITA-2734 / 2007-08 271(1)(c ) DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / Ramasamy 2023-24 / 1055464745(1) Jagadishkumar, Chny / 2024 ACIT dated 28.08.2023 Old No.5, Central 2 ITA-2735 / 2009-10 144 r.w.s. DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / New No.41, 147 2023-24 / 1055465025(1) Circle-1, Chny / 2024 Post Office dated 28.08.2023 Coim- 271

RAMASAMY JAGADISHKUMAR,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as under:-

ITA 2737/CHNY/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2734/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2007-8 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2735/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2009-10 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2736/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2010-11 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2737/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2011-12 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2738/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2012-13 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2739/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2013-14 Ramasamy Jagadishkumar, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Old No.5, New No.41, Vs. Tax, Post Office Road, Central Circle-1, Krishnasamy Nagar, Coimbatore Coimbatore-641045 [Pan: Acapj0483C] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri S.Sridhar, Advocate अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.V.Aswathy, Jcit : 17.12.2024 सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing घोर्णध की तधरीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2024

For Respondent: Ms.V.Aswathy, JCIT
Section 1Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)

section 1 ITA-2734 / 2007-08 271(1)(c ) DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / Ramasamy 2023-24 / 1055464745(1) Jagadishkumar, Chny / 2024 ACIT dated 28.08.2023 Old No.5, Central 2 ITA-2735 / 2009-10 144 r.w.s. DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / New No.41, 147 2023-24 / 1055465025(1) Circle-1, Chny / 2024 Post Office dated 28.08.2023 Coim- 271

RAMASAMY JAGADISHKUMAR,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1., COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are decided as under:-

ITA 2738/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2734/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2007-8 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2735/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2009-10 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2736/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2010-11 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2737/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2011-12 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2738/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2012-13 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2739/Chny/2024, निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year-2013-14 Ramasamy Jagadishkumar, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Old No.5, New No.41, Vs. Tax, Post Office Road, Central Circle-1, Krishnasamy Nagar, Coimbatore Coimbatore-641045 [Pan: Acapj0483C] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri S.Sridhar, Advocate अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.V.Aswathy, Jcit : 17.12.2024 सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing घोर्णध की तधरीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2024

For Respondent: Ms.V.Aswathy, JCIT
Section 1Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)

section 1 ITA-2734 / 2007-08 271(1)(c ) DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / Ramasamy 2023-24 / 1055464745(1) Jagadishkumar, Chny / 2024 ACIT dated 28.08.2023 Old No.5, Central 2 ITA-2735 / 2009-10 144 r.w.s. DIN: ITBA / APL / M / 250 / New No.41, 147 2023-24 / 1055465025(1) Circle-1, Chny / 2024 Post Office dated 28.08.2023 Coim- 271