BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 281Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai6Ahmedabad3Delhi2

Key Topics

Section 14812Section 133A6Section 271(1)6Section 281B6Penalty6Reassessment6Reopening of Assessment6Addition to Income6Survey u/s 133A6

M.R.PRASAD,TRICHY vs. ITO, TRICHY

In the result, the appeals of the assessees for all the

ITA 1219/CHNY/2017[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Aug 2017AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. A.S. Sriraman, Adv
Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 281B

penalty under section 271(1) ( c) Income-tax Act, even while giving opportunity to the petitioner in proceedings dated February 10, 2005, to submit their objections on or before February, 2005, with regard to reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2001-01 and before deciding the matter on the merits. The notices of reassessment as well as consequential

S.DEVENDRAN,TRICHY vs. ITO, TRICHY

In the result, the appeals of the assessees for all the

ITA 1220/CHNY/2017[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Aug 2017AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. A.S. Sriraman, Adv
Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 281B

penalty under section 271(1) ( c) Income-tax Act, even while giving opportunity to the petitioner in proceedings dated February 10, 2005, to submit their objections on or before February, 2005, with regard to reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2001-01 and before deciding the matter on the merits. The notices of reassessment as well as consequential

PRAKASH,TRICHY vs. ITO, TRICHY

In the result, the appeals of the assessees for all the

ITA 1223/CHNY/2017[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Aug 2017AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. A.S. Sriraman, Adv
Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 281B

penalty under section 271(1) ( c) Income-tax Act, even while giving opportunity to the petitioner in proceedings dated February 10, 2005, to submit their objections on or before February, 2005, with regard to reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2001-01 and before deciding the matter on the merits. The notices of reassessment as well as consequential

M.R.PRASAD,TRICHY vs. ITO, TRICHY

In the result, the appeals of the assessees for all the

ITA 1218/CHNY/2017[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Aug 2017AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. A.S. Sriraman, Adv
Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 281B

penalty under section 271(1) ( c) Income-tax Act, even while giving opportunity to the petitioner in proceedings dated February 10, 2005, to submit their objections on or before February, 2005, with regard to reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2001-01 and before deciding the matter on the merits. The notices of reassessment as well as consequential

PRAKASH,TRICHY vs. ITO, TRICHY

In the result, the appeals of the assessees for all the

ITA 1222/CHNY/2017[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Aug 2017AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. A.S. Sriraman, Adv
Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 281B

penalty under section 271(1) ( c) Income-tax Act, even while giving opportunity to the petitioner in proceedings dated February 10, 2005, to submit their objections on or before February, 2005, with regard to reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2001-01 and before deciding the matter on the merits. The notices of reassessment as well as consequential

S.DEVENDRAN,TRICHY vs. ITO, TRICHY

In the result, the appeals of the assessees for all the

ITA 1221/CHNY/2017[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Aug 2017AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. A.S. Sriraman, Adv
Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 281B

penalty under section 271(1) ( c) Income-tax Act, even while giving opportunity to the petitioner in proceedings dated February 10, 2005, to submit their objections on or before February, 2005, with regard to reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 2001-01 and before deciding the matter on the merits. The notices of reassessment as well as consequential