BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 244A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi113Mumbai103Bangalore24Karnataka21Ahmedabad16Allahabad16Kolkata10Chandigarh7Jaipur6Chennai4Cochin3Lucknow3Pune2Indore2Rajkot1Dehradun1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)12Section 143(3)4Exemption4Penalty4

NAGARJUNA OIL CORPORATION LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 4(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2604/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R. Mohan Reddy, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 6.2 It seems that the AO levied penalty @ 200%. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A). 7. The CIT(A) restricted the penalty to minimum and accordingly, restricted the penalty of Rs.7.25 crores for assessment year 2011- 12 and Rs.5.50 crores for assessment year 2012-13 by observing in paras

NAGARJUNA OIL CORPORATION LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 4(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2605/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R. Mohan Reddy, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 6.2 It seems that the AO levied penalty @ 200%. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A). 7. The CIT(A) restricted the penalty to minimum and accordingly, restricted the penalty of Rs.7.25 crores for assessment year 2011- 12 and Rs.5.50 crores for assessment year 2012-13 by observing in paras

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 4(2), CHENNAI vs. NAGARJUNA OIL CORPORATION LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2703/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R. Mohan Reddy, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 6.2 It seems that the AO levied penalty @ 200%. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A). 7. The CIT(A) restricted the penalty to minimum and accordingly, restricted the penalty of Rs.7.25 crores for assessment year 2011- 12 and Rs.5.50 crores for assessment year 2012-13 by observing in paras

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 4(2), CHENNAI vs. NAGARJUNA OIL CORPORATION LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2704/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R. Mohan Reddy, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 6.2 It seems that the AO levied penalty @ 200%. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A). 7. The CIT(A) restricted the penalty to minimum and accordingly, restricted the penalty of Rs.7.25 crores for assessment year 2011- 12 and Rs.5.50 crores for assessment year 2012-13 by observing in paras