MMRF REALITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 4 (1), CHENNAI
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed
ITA 627/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.627/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 Mmrf Realty & Infrastructure Pvt. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Ltd., No. 21, Indira Nagar, Income Tax, 1St Avenue, Adyar, Corporate Circle -4(1), Chennai – 600 020. Chennai. [Pan: Aahcm1575E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri I. Dinesh, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.01.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Impugned Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 8, Chennai Dated 20.12.2017 In Ita No. 162/15-16 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Enhancing The Assessment Is Wrong, Illegal, Unjust, Arbitrary & Is Liable To Set Aside.
For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 35D
housing properties and infrastructure development. The assessee filed its return of income on 29.09.2012 and later revised on 09.02.2013 claiming a loss of ₹.17,97,462/-. The case was selected for scrutiny. In response to the statutory notices, the assessee filed various documents and records before the Assessing Officer. After considering the submissions of the assessee, the Assessing Officer completed
