BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 292Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore41Mumbai32Delhi29Amritsar27Chandigarh18Jaipur13Nagpur11Lucknow9Hyderabad6Patna5Chennai3Kolkata3Cuttack3Pune2Ahmedabad2Surat1Allahabad1Indore1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 14A4Section 683House Property3Addition to Income3Section 542Section 24A2Capital Gains2Long Term Capital Gains2Deduction2

ACIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. ABHAYA KASHMIRA, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is treated as

ITA 2542/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. No. 2542/Chny/2017 & Co No: 5/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Smt. Abhaya Kashmira, Tax, Vs. No. 6 & 7, Ramgiriextn., Non- Corporate Circle -1(1), Taramani, Velachery Link Road, Formerly Known As Business Circle -1, Chennai – 600 042. Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aixpk 0809J]

For Appellant: Shri. J. Prabhakar, CAFor Respondent: Shri. K. Mohamed Mustafa, JCIT
Section 14ASection 24ASection 54

house property” by :-9-: ITA No.225/Chny/2018 & 2542/Chny/2017 & CO No. 5/Chny/2018 resorting to subterfuge of section 292B which does not condone

Disallowance2

ABHAYA KASHMIRA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE -1, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is treated as

ITA 225/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. No. 2542/Chny/2017 & Co No: 5/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Smt. Abhaya Kashmira, Tax, Vs. No. 6 & 7, Ramgiriextn., Non- Corporate Circle -1(1), Taramani, Velachery Link Road, Formerly Known As Business Circle -1, Chennai – 600 042. Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aixpk 0809J]

For Appellant: Shri. J. Prabhakar, CAFor Respondent: Shri. K. Mohamed Mustafa, JCIT
Section 14ASection 24ASection 54

house property” by :-9-: ITA No.225/Chny/2018 & 2542/Chny/2017 & CO No. 5/Chny/2018 resorting to subterfuge of section 292B which does not condone

V.RAJENDRABABU,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 141/CHNY/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Apr 2017AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. K. Meenakshi Sundaram, ITPFor Respondent: Shri. Murali Mohan, JCIT
Section 68

House Property’’ and ‘’Income from Other Sources’’. Even in the final assessment, only these two heads of income were considered. Thus, though assessee had claimed it was doing a real estate business, neither it had claimed any profit from this business not any loss. In other words, assessee could not :- 5 -: demonstrate any business to have been conducted