BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

43 results for “house property”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai43Karnataka21Mumbai13Ahmedabad6Kolkata6Jaipur4Delhi3Chandigarh2Rajkot1Bangalore1SC1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A42Section 271A42Penalty42Section 139(9)4Section 2644

A.G.T. ELECTRONICS LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. ADIT, CPC, , BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2767/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon’Ble S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.2767/Chny/2024 िनधा8रण वष8 /Assessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode)For Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 264Section 44A

271A and 272A - Commissioners (Appeals) to have the same powers as Appellate Assistant Commissioners in regard to imposition of penalty. Section 245 - Commissioners (Appeals) authorised to set off refund against tax remaining payable. Section 245A - Inclusion of Commissioner (Appeals) as an income-tax authority for purposes of Chapter XIXA relating to settlement of cases. AGT Electronics Ltd. :- 8 -: Sections

Showing 1–20 of 43 · Page 1 of 3

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2359/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2588/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2361/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2362/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2363/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2396/CHNY/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2397/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2398/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2399/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2400/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2401/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2402/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2587/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2360/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2589/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2590/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2591/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2592/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2358/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

property was out of cash gifts received from his relatives. The donors are close relatives of the assessee and the gifts have been fully supported with documents such as gift deeds. Hence under such circumstances, it cannot be treated as unexplained investment. 17.3.1 The appellant has just relied on the deed. It is noticed that the gifts have been received