BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad9Jaipur7Amritsar6Chennai5Mumbai4Bangalore4Delhi4Lucknow4Pune2Chandigarh2Cuttack2Jabalpur1Indore1Nagpur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 271D36Section 271E16Section 269S16Section 269T9Penalty5Section 1324Section 271(1)(c)4Addition to Income4Limitation/Time-bar4

DCIT, CENTRALCIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM THANU, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross

ITA 785/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.785, 786, 787 & 788/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 40, 41, 42 & 43/Chny/2023 (In I.T.A. Nos.785 To 788/Chny/2023)

For Respondent: Shri A. Sasi Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 269TSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

269T (Recording of satisfaction) - Assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93 - Assessee was engaged in large scale purchase and sale of wheat - For relevant years, Assessing Officer passed assessment order determining certain taxable income - While framing assessment, Assessing Officer also opined that assessee had contravened provisions of section 269SS and, thus, penalty proceedings were initiated under section 271E - Commissioner (Appeals

DCIT, CENTRALCIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM THANU, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross

ITA 786/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.785, 786, 787 & 788/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 40, 41, 42 & 43/Chny/2023 (In I.T.A. Nos.785 To 788/Chny/2023)

For Respondent: Shri A. Sasi Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 269TSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

269T (Recording of satisfaction) - Assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93 - Assessee was engaged in large scale purchase and sale of wheat - For relevant years, Assessing Officer passed assessment order determining certain taxable income - While framing assessment, Assessing Officer also opined that assessee had contravened provisions of section 269SS and, thus, penalty proceedings were initiated under section 271E - Commissioner (Appeals

DCIT, CENTRALCIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM THANU, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross

ITA 787/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.785, 786, 787 & 788/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 40, 41, 42 & 43/Chny/2023 (In I.T.A. Nos.785 To 788/Chny/2023)

For Respondent: Shri A. Sasi Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 269TSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

269T (Recording of satisfaction) - Assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93 - Assessee was engaged in large scale purchase and sale of wheat - For relevant years, Assessing Officer passed assessment order determining certain taxable income - While framing assessment, Assessing Officer also opined that assessee had contravened provisions of section 269SS and, thus, penalty proceedings were initiated under section 271E - Commissioner (Appeals

DCIT, CENTRALCIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM THANU, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross

ITA 788/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.785, 786, 787 & 788/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 40, 41, 42 & 43/Chny/2023 (In I.T.A. Nos.785 To 788/Chny/2023)

For Respondent: Shri A. Sasi Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 269TSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

269T (Recording of satisfaction) - Assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93 - Assessee was engaged in large scale purchase and sale of wheat - For relevant years, Assessing Officer passed assessment order determining certain taxable income - While framing assessment, Assessing Officer also opined that assessee had contravened provisions of section 269SS and, thus, penalty proceedings were initiated under section 271E - Commissioner (Appeals

NOORDEEN AHMED AMINA ,SALEM vs. ITO , NFAC , DELHI

The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 1118/CHNY/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jul 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1118/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रणवष1 / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Noordeen Ahmed Amina Ito बनाम/ 18/27, Ranga Nagar, Suramangalam, Nfac Vs. Salem-636 005. New Delhi. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Bxepa-3157-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : ("#थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Ms. N.V.Lakshmi(Advocate)- Ld Ar "#थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri D.Hema Bhupal (Jcit) – Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24-07-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26-07-2023 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aggrieved By Confirmation Of Penalty U/S 271D For Rs.5 Lacs For Assessment Year (Ay) 2018-19, The Assessee Is In Further Appeal Before Us. The Impugned Order Has Been Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Cit(A)] On 26-09-2022 In The Matter Of Impugned Penalty Levied By Ld. Assessing Officer [Ao] U/S. 271D Of The Act Vide Order Dated 22-02-2022. In The Penalty Order, The Penalty Has Been Levied On The Finding That The Assessee Has Received Rs.5 Lacs In Cash On Sale Of Immovable Property

For Appellant: Ms. N.V.Lakshmi(Advocate)- Ld ARFor Respondent: Shri D.Hema Bhupal (JCIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 269SSection 269TSection 271D

Housing Finance Ltd, and balance of Rs.5,50,000 has been received on 06.07.2017 through cheque No.372402 drawn on Corporation Bank, Salem Town Branch. The schedule of the agreement clearly indicates that the property transferred is land and building constructed thereon. With this clear background, the submissions of the assessee have been examined. Section 269SS as amended w.e.f