DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

iii)an entry or entries in the books of account,\nwhich has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty\nlakh rupees or more:\nProvided that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time in\na case for the relevant assessment year beginning on or before 1st day\nof April, 2021, if a notice

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT.. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

iii)an entry or entries in the books of account,\nwhich has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty\nlakh rupees or more:\nProvided that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time in\na case for the relevant assessment year beginning on or before 1st day\nof April, 2021, if a notice

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

iii)an entry or entries in the books of account,\nwhich has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty\nlakh rupees or more:\nProvided that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time in\na case for the relevant assessment year beginning on or before 1st day\nof April, 2021, if a notice

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

iii)an entry or entries in the books of account,\nwhich has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty\nlakh rupees or more:\nProvided that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time in\na case for the relevant assessment year beginning on or before 1st day\nof April, 2021, if a notice

DCIT, CC2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. JAYAPRIYA COMPANY, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Property Developers. The assessee firm is also involved in the business of money lending which is carried out in the name & style of M/s Jayapriya Financiers. The assessee also operates a guest house and theatre by the name of M/s Jayapriya Guest House and M/s Jayapriya Theatre respectively. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted upon

DCIT, CEN CIR 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. JAYAPRIYA COMPANY, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Property Developers. The assessee firm is also involved in the business of money lending which is carried out in the name & style of M/s Jayapriya Financiers. The assessee also operates a guest house and theatre by the name of M/s Jayapriya Guest House and M/s Jayapriya Theatre respectively. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted upon

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

iii)an entry or entries in the books of account,\nwhich has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty\nlakh rupees or more:\nProvided that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time in\na case for the relevant assessment year beginning on or before 1st day\nof April, 2021, if a notice

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

iii)an entry or entries in the books of account,\nwhich has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty\nlakh rupees or more:\nProvided that no notice under section 148 shall be issued at any time in\na case for the relevant assessment year beginning on or before 1st day\nof April, 2021, if a notice

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(1), CHENNAI vs. REPCO HOME FINANCE P LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA no

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ramit Kochar

iii) Repairs and renovation: This is one type of long tenure housing loan provided to needy people for the purpose of extension or reconstructing existing dwelling unit undertake major repairs. :- 12 -: iv) Home Equity Loans: These are loan against mortgage of immovable residential properties.” 6.3 The A.O. further observed from the website of the assessee company that the assessee

M/S. CEEBROS HOTELS PVT. LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CC - 1 (2),, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

housing project in view of the major work of demolition of the existing structure newly built by the previous order for hotel business by the appellant. Hence, it was submitted that there was nothing absolutely wrong in treating the property as inventory in the compilation of financial statements. It was also stated that the inventory in the business/holding

JESUDASON BIJI ,CHENNAI vs. OFFICE OF INCOME TAX OFFICER INT. TAXN WARD1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

houses and the total consideration received during F.Y. 2013-14 is Rs.3,46,12,700/-. And the assessee had deposited Rs.50,00,000/- in 54EC bonds on 31.12.2013 and hence was eligible for deduction u/s.54EC. However, in respect of the claim of deduction u/s.54F, AO noted that the investment was made in acquisition of a vacant land and construction

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NON-CORPORATE CIRCLE 7(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE SUBRAMANIAN SARAVANAN, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Re

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

iii)If the amount of the capital gain is equal to or less than the cost of the new residential house, the capital gain shall not be charged under the new residential house, the capital gain shall not be charged under the new residential house, the capital gain shall not be charged under Section 45. 20. What

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

property at No.56 and 56A, Thirumalai Pillai Road, Chennai never reached the logical end of acquisition in assessee’s name and refund of the amount ITA Nos2125 to 2128 :- 28 -: & 2219 to 2222 /2017 by Shri. Sampath, did not take the transaction out of in purview of Section 13(1) ( c) of the Act. (viii) Ld. Commissioner of Income

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

property at No.56 and 56A, Thirumalai Pillai Road, Chennai never reached the logical end of acquisition in assessee’s name and refund of the amount ITA Nos2125 to 2128 :- 28 -: & 2219 to 2222 /2017 by Shri. Sampath, did not take the transaction out of in purview of Section 13(1) ( c) of the Act. (viii) Ld. Commissioner of Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

property at No.56 and 56A, Thirumalai Pillai Road, Chennai never reached the logical end of acquisition in assessee’s name and refund of the amount ITA Nos2125 to 2128 :- 28 -: & 2219 to 2222 /2017 by Shri. Sampath, did not take the transaction out of in purview of Section 13(1) ( c) of the Act. (viii) Ld. Commissioner of Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

property at No.56 and 56A, Thirumalai Pillai Road, Chennai never reached the logical end of acquisition in assessee’s name and refund of the amount ITA Nos2125 to 2128 :- 28 -: & 2219 to 2222 /2017 by Shri. Sampath, did not take the transaction out of in purview of Section 13(1) ( c) of the Act. (viii) Ld. Commissioner of Income

TAMIL NADU BRICK INDUSTRIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.744/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2013-14 M/S. Tamilnadu Brick Industries, The Income Tax Officer, No. 47, Mangali Nagar 1St Street, Vs. Non Corporate Circle 8(1), Arumbakkam, Chennai 600 106. Chennai. [Pan: Aafft3643P] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Vijay Kumar Punna, Jr. Standing Counsel सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 13.02.2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.05.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 9, Chennai, Dated 27.02.2017 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2013-14. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: “1. The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 9, Chennai Dated 27.02.2017 In I.T.A.No.07/Cit(A)-9/2016-17 For The Above Mentioned Assessment Year Is Contrary To Law, Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case.

26. This Court, in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Excel Industries, (2014) 13 SCC 459 at 463-464 referrred to various judgements on the expression ‘accrues’ and then held: “14. First of all, it is now well settled that income tax cannot be levied on hypothetical income. In CIT v. Shoorji Vallabhdas and Co. (CIT v. Shoorji Vallabhdas

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NUNGAMBAKKAM vs. R K M POWERGEN PRIVATE LIMITED, T NAGAR

In the result the appeal of the revenue for the both the

properties received by an assessee for inadequate consideration, but it did not apply to companies and applies only to individuals and HUF. It was by Finance Act 2017 that with effect from Assessment Year 2018-19 that this provision was substituted by Section 56(2)(x) that extended these deeming provisions to companies also. Thus, there is no case