BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai146Delhi142Bangalore90Ahmedabad32Jaipur21Raipur17Kolkata14Indore5Chennai3Surat2Karnataka2Nagpur2Pune2Jodhpur1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Section 56(2)(x)2Section 2542Depreciation2Condonation of Delay2

V S TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-3(5), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2633/CHNY/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Jan 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr.Vikram VijayaraghavanFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 234DSection 250Section 270ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 56(2)(x)

234D of the IT Act. 11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the NFAC erred in not quashing the action of the Ld. AO of initiating penalty proceedings under section 270A of the IT Act. The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend, delete all or any of the grounds of appeal before

PENTA MEDIA GRAPHICS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result , appeal in ITA no

ITA 1406/CHNY/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 May 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Duvvuru R.L.Reddy

For Respondent: Mr. A.Sundararajan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 254

234D of the Act. The levies are arbitrary, high and liable to be cancelled. 10. Any other ground that may be raised at the time of personal hearing.” For AY 2009-10: “General 1. The order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 23.03.2015, is arbitrary, erroneous, incorrect and contrary to law and facts. Depreciation on Digital Content

PENTA MEDIA GRAPHICS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result , appeal in ITA no

ITA 1407/CHNY/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 May 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Duvvuru R.L.Reddy

For Respondent: Mr. A.Sundararajan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 254

234D of the Act. The levies are arbitrary, high and liable to be cancelled. 10. Any other ground that may be raised at the time of personal hearing.” For AY 2009-10: “General 1. The order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 23.03.2015, is arbitrary, erroneous, incorrect and contrary to law and facts. Depreciation on Digital Content