BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 142A(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh41Delhi32Agra14Jaipur13Indore10Raipur9Bangalore8Mumbai7Hyderabad7Kolkata6Lucknow5Pune4Varanasi3Chennai3Ahmedabad2Nagpur1Jodhpur1Cochin1SC1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 142A3Section 250(6)2Section 143(3)2Section 692Section 142A(6)2Addition to Income2

RAMAKRISHNAN PRABHU JYOTHI,,COIMBATORE vs. ACOT, NCC-5, , COIMBATORE

In the result the appeal is dismissed

ITA 690/CHNY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Aug 2024AY 2016-17
Section 142ASection 142A(1)Section 142A(6)Section 143(1)Section 153Section 250

142A\n28.12.2018\n3\nTimeline by which Valuation Officer should have\ncompleted assessment in terms of Letter dated\n28.12.2018\n28.01.2019\n4\nStatutory \"Time line by which Valuation Officer\nshould have completed assessment (Section\n142A(6)\n30.06.2019\n5\nPeriod excluded for purposes of computing\nlimitation under Section 153 in terms of letter\ndated 28.12.2018\nFrom\n28.12.2018\nto 28.01.2019\n6\nPeriod excluded

M/S VARALAKSHMI STARCH INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,SALEM vs. CIT (APPEAL)-18 , CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 723/CHNY/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 723 & 724/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri. V. Balaji, CA
Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 69

142A of the Actas valid when the Ld. ADIT(Inv.) is not empowered to make such reference as per the provisions of the Act as existed on 03-07-2014, being the date of reference to DVO. GROUND4: OTHER DEFECTS IN VALUATION REPORT 4.1 Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred

M/S VARALAKSHMI STARCH INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,SALEM vs. CIT (APPEAL)-18 , CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 724/CHNY/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 723 & 724/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri. V. Balaji, CA
Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 69

142A of the Actas valid when the Ld. ADIT(Inv.) is not empowered to make such reference as per the provisions of the Act as existed on 03-07-2014, being the date of reference to DVO. GROUND4: OTHER DEFECTS IN VALUATION REPORT 4.1 Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred