BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

908 results for “disallowance”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,529Delhi2,120Chennai908Kolkata790Bangalore761Ahmedabad517Jaipur352Hyderabad244Pune201Raipur165Indore148Surat143Chandigarh102Karnataka95Agra72Rajkot59Panaji59Nagpur59Lucknow58Visakhapatnam47Calcutta44Cochin42Cuttack37SC34Guwahati31Amritsar26Telangana19Jabalpur18Dehradun17Kerala15Ranchi11Jodhpur11Allahabad5Punjab & Haryana4Patna4Rajasthan3Orissa2Varanasi2Himachal Pradesh1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)54Disallowance53Addition to Income51Section 4049Section 14736Deduction33Section 529Section 26328Section 19528Section 148

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NON-CORPORATE CIRCLE 7(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE SUBRAMANIAN SARAVANAN, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Re

ITA 1132/CHNY/2023[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Mar 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Anita, Addl. CIT
Section 54F

short “the Act”) in respect of cost of the land of the land purchased ITA & CO No. 18/Chny/2024 CO No. 18/Chny/2024(AY 2015-16) Vellore Subramanian Saravanan Vellore Subramanian Saravanan :: 4 :: on 01.02.2013 (i.e. more than 2 years on 01.02.2013 (i.e. more than 2 years & 1 month before the sale of 1 month before the sale of long term capital

PALANISAMY RANI,ERODE vs. PCIT-1, COIMBATORE, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1490/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 908 · Page 1 of 46

...
26
Section 14A18
TDS18
ITAT Chennai
10 Jul 2024
AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1490/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Principal Commissioner Of Palanisamy Rani, V. Income Tax, 38, Emm Road-2, Chennimalai Coimbatore. Road, Erode – 638 001. [Pan:Biqpr-2991-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. T. Vasudevan, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. V. Nandakumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.05.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10.07.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. V. Nandakumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54F

disallowed the assessee’s claim of indexed cost of acquisition of building Rs.12,96,709/- and taxed her share of sale consideration of building @ 20% considering it as long-term capital gain. However, the ‘sale consideration of building’ ought to have considered as short

SHRI RAMASWAMY SHIVARAMAN,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC - 1 (1),, CHENNAI

ITA 571/CHNY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Dec 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.571/Chny/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17

Section 54F

Term Capital Gain amounting to Rs.6,22,63,014/- (Tax Effect- Rs.1,43,65,323/-). 3A. Thereby the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of Short

ACIT, LTU-2,, CHENNAI vs. ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2618/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

short-term capital gains of Rs. 1.84 crores on transfer of Current Assets. However, in the light of above principles, the First Appellate Authority cancelled the addition of Rs. 1.84 crores. In the circumstances, we are of the view that the transaction in question was a slump sale.” ITA Nos.2330 & 2618/Chny/2019 (AY 2015-16) M/s. Ashok Leyland

BHARATHAN ANAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2630/CHNY/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S.Sunder Singh

Section 48Section 49Section 54

disallowance of Rs.1 0,96,970/- made by the learned Income Tax Officer and confirmed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) be deleted. 3. The Appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter vary and / or withdraw any or all the above grounds of Appeal. 2. All the grounds of appeal are related to the addition made

M/S APEX TRANSWORLD PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CC-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 932/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.932/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2011-12 V. M/S.Apex Transworld Pvt. Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner Of 38, 2Nd Main Road, Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai-600 028. Chennai. [Pan: Aadca 7034 L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.K. Ramesh Babu, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr. Ar.V.Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr. AR.V.Sreenivasan
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

gain - - 2,83,97,670 Sales consideration of building 3rd 3,32,98,000 - - floor Less: Cost of acquisition 4,64,47,318 - - Short term capital loss - -1,31,49,318 - Sales consideration of building 4th 2,66,55,000 - - floor Less: Cost of acquisition 4,31,77,658 - - Short term capital loss - -1,65,22,658 - Total short term

M.KIRAN KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3374/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 Mar 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri G.Baskar, Advocate
Section 10(38)Section 133ASection 2(22)(e)

disallowance of exemption claimed u/s.10(38) of the Act towards long term capital gain derived from transfer of equity shares of M/s. Mahavir Advanced Remedies Limited. 9.1 The fact with regard to the impugned dispute are that the assessee has acquired 6 lakhs equity shares of M/s. Indo American Advanced Pharmaceutical Limited [subsequently name changed to Mahavir Advanced Remedies Limited

GOPAL SRINIVASAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for 16

ITA 948/CHNY/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jan 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Abraham P.George & Shri George Mathan

For Appellant: Shri. R. Vijayaraghavan, Adv
Section 111A

short-term capital gains referred to in sub-section (1), the rebate under section 88 shall be allowed from the income-tax on the total income as reduced by such capital gains’’’. We find that none of the lower authorities had addressed the issue whether the transactions of shares claimed by the assessee satisfied the conditions

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. GOPAL SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for 16

ITA 1423/CHNY/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jan 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Abraham P.George & Shri George Mathan

For Appellant: Shri. R. Vijayaraghavan, Adv
Section 111A

short-term capital gains referred to in sub-section (1), the rebate under section 88 shall be allowed from the income-tax on the total income as reduced by such capital gains’’’. We find that none of the lower authorities had addressed the issue whether the transactions of shares claimed by the assessee satisfied the conditions

ACIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 20(1), CHENNAI vs. PVP CINEMAS P. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1058/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Mar 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1058/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S. Pvp Cinemas P.Ltd. Krm Centre, 9Th Floor, Tax Non-Corporate Circle-20(1) No.2,Harrington Road, Chennai-34. Chetpet , Chennai-600 031. Pan: Aaeca 8733H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Respondent: 25.01.2022
Section 143(3)

disallowance of Rs.1,52,19,882/- while computing the short term capital gains without verifying the genuineness of the bills

ADHI KUMARA GURU,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NCC-22(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 120/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaमाननीय "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं माननीय "ी अिमताभ शु"ा, लेखा सद" के सम"

For Appellant: Mr. P.M. Kathir, Advocate for Mr.G.Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 54F

disallowing the cost of improvement of Rs.15,00,000/- claimed by the claimed by the assessee while computing while computing ‘Short Term Capital Gains

V.KALPAGAM,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 10(2), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3034/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 3034/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Smt. V. Kalpagam, The Income Tax Officer, No.2, Door No. 9, Raja V. Non Corporate Ward 10(2), Sadhan, Gajapathy Road, Chennai. Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. [Pan: Ahupk-0879-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19.07.2023

For Respondent: Shri. AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT

capital gains arising out of subsequent sale of three flats as short term as the appellant cannot sell the UDS separately and building portion separately. It is a composite sale and the learned AO cannot treat them as separate sale. 2.7 The learned Commissioner (Appeals) should not have sustained the disallowance

PADMA VASHI SHEWARAMANI,CHENNAI vs. ADIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the impugned is set aside and the appeal of the

ITA 2281/CHNY/2014[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Mar 2015AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Vikas Awasthyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2281/Mds/2014 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2007-08 Smt. Padma Vashi Shewaramani, The Assistant Director Of No.73, Janki Bhawan, V. Income Tax, Sardar Patel Road, International Taxation, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aayps 4687 D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K.M. Mohandass, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. Das Gupta, JCIT
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 50

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D (2) Rejection of set off of short term capital loss against short term capital gains

K.R.MURALIDHAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1097/CHNY/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jun 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1097/Mds/2015 & S.P. No.338/Mds/2015 (In I.T.A. No.1097/Mds/2015) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Shri K.R. Muralidhar, Old No.120, New No.246, The Income Tax Officer, Room No.24 & 25, 1St Floor, V. Non-Corporate Circle – 13, Govindappa Naicken Street, Chennai - 600 034. Chennai - 600 001. Pan : Aagpm 9070 N (Appellant & Petitioner) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT
Section 2(47)

gain in view of the investment in Rural Electrification Corporation Limited bonds and investment in residential house property. The assessee also claimed short-term capital loss of `11,35,986/- on account of extinction of Goodwill. However, the Assessing Officer disallowed

ANIL KUMAR GOEL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, Ground Nos

ITA 3142/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

Section 10(38)Section 14Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14A

short term capital gains by the Assessee himself and in respect of the shares held beyond 12 months was shown as long term capital gains. 5. The CIT (Appeals) ignored the scope and purport of the CBDT circular bearing no.6 of 2016 dated 29th February 2016, wherein the Assessee’ desire to treat the transactions as capital gains would

GOLDEN ERA PLANTATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT,CIRCLE 1, OOTY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 838/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 838/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri. T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, CAFor Respondent: Shri. M. Rajan, CIT

short term capital gain. The details submissions made by the appellant on this aspect before the AO and the first appellate authority has not been considered in all its aspects. 2. That, on the facts and circumstances of the case the CIT(A) is not justified in sustaining the sum of Rs. 17,721/- in the total disallowance

LAKSHMANAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO N.C.W 1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2882/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2882/Chny/2018 & नि◌धा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2015-16 V. Mr.Lakshmanan, The Income Tax Officer, No.7/2, 1St Floor, Akm Nest, Non-Corporate Ward-1(3), Jawaharlal Nehru Street, T.Nagar, Chennai. Chennai-600 017. [Pan: Aabpl 4326 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Vasudevan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.AR.V.Sreenivasan
Section 43(5)Section 45

short term capital gains from stocks are taxed at 15%. However, STT is payable only if you have taken delivery of the stocks and then sold them. It is not payable on intra-day transactions. So, any profit from day trading is treated as speculative income and taxed as income from business. So, the tax can be as high

LAKSHMANAN REVATHI,CHENNAI vs. ITO N.C.W 1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2883/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2882/Chny/2018 & नि◌धा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2015-16 V. Mr.Lakshmanan, The Income Tax Officer, No.7/2, 1St Floor, Akm Nest, Non-Corporate Ward-1(3), Jawaharlal Nehru Street, T.Nagar, Chennai. Chennai-600 017. [Pan: Aabpl 4326 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Vasudevan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.AR.V.Sreenivasan
Section 43(5)Section 45

short term capital gains from stocks are taxed at 15%. However, STT is payable only if you have taken delivery of the stocks and then sold them. It is not payable on intra-day transactions. So, any profit from day trading is treated as speculative income and taxed as income from business. So, the tax can be as high

LAKSHMANAN,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 1 (3),, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2744/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2882/Chny/2018 & नि◌धा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2015-16 V. Mr.Lakshmanan, The Income Tax Officer, No.7/2, 1St Floor, Akm Nest, Non-Corporate Ward-1(3), Jawaharlal Nehru Street, T.Nagar, Chennai. Chennai-600 017. [Pan: Aabpl 4326 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.T. Vasudevan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.AR.V.Sreenivasan
Section 43(5)Section 45

short term capital gains from stocks are taxed at 15%. However, STT is payable only if you have taken delivery of the stocks and then sold them. It is not payable on intra-day transactions. So, any profit from day trading is treated as speculative income and taxed as income from business. So, the tax can be as high

NARENDRA MAHENDRA KOTHARI,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 5(2), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1006/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1006/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 V. Shri Narendra Mahendra- The Income Tax Officer, Kothari, Non-Corporate Ward-5(2), No.76, Osian Heights, Chennai. Basin Bridge Road, Mint, Chennai-600 079. [Pan: Amopk 2535 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Shri D. Anand, Advocate : ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By Shri Arv Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit : सुनवाईक"तारीख/Date Of Hearing 05.02.2024 घोषणाक"तारीख /Date Of : 14.02.2024 Pronouncement

Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)Section 54Section 68Section 80C

short term capital gains and disallowance of investment u/s.54 of The Act. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in law in assessing