M/S T vs. SRICHAKRA LIMITED,MADURAIVS.DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE, MADURAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 36/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Tvs Srichakra Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 7-B, Tvs Building, V. Income Tax, West Veli Street, Corporate Circle, Madurai – 625 001. Madurai. [Pan: Aaact-5557-G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 29.11.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29.11.2023

disallowing deduction under section 801C of the Act applying provision of section 80A / 80AC. The CIT (A) failed to appreciate

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NUMGAMBAKKAM vs. JSR INFRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

80A(5) and 80AC was met. He further showed us that the assessee had also obtained certificate in Form 10CCB showed us that the assessee had also obtained certificate in Form 10CCB showed us that the assessee had also obtained certificate in Form 10CCB as mandated in Section 80 as mandated in Section

G 873 AYYAPPANTHANGAL URBAN CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,KANCHEEPURAM vs. ITO, WARD-8(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 359/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 G 873 Ayyappanthangal Urban Income Tax Officer, Cooperative Credit Society Limited, Vs. Ward 8 (2), 473 Main Road Iyyappanthangal Chennai – 600 090. Village, Chennai Sriperumbuthur Tk., Kancheepuram Dt. – 600 056. [Pan:Aacag-5262-F ] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection of the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions of Section 80A

K 0716 RAKKIAPALAYAM PACC,TIRUPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4) TIRUPUR, TIRUPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

disallowed deduction claimed\nu/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection\nof the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions\nof Section 80A

AMMAPALAYAM BASUVAPTTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection of the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions of Section 80A

AMMAPALAYAM BASUVAPTTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection of the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions of Section 80A

NARASEEPURAM PACCS,COIMBATORE vs. NON CORP WARD 4(1), CBE, COIMBATORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George George Kआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1696 & 1697/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2020-21 M/S. Naraseepuram Paccs, The Income Tax Officer, Poondi Road, Narasipuram B.O, Vs. Non-Corporate Ward 4(1), Narasipuram, Coimbatore Coimbatore – 641 109. Pan: Aaaan 9388H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Sudhakar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Y. Sudarshan, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.09.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R These Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Two Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Both Dated 26.05.2025 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). The Relevant Assessment Years Are 2017-18 & 2020-21. 2. The Solitary Issue Raised Is Whether The First Appellate Authority (Faa) Is Justified In Confirming The Ao’S Action In Denying The Claim Of Deduction U/S.80P Of The Act.

disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection of the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions of Section 80A

NARASEEPURAM PACCS,COIMBATORE vs. NON CORP WARD 4(1), CBE, COIMBATORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George George Kआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1696 & 1697/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2020-21 M/S. Naraseepuram Paccs, The Income Tax Officer, Poondi Road, Narasipuram B.O, Vs. Non-Corporate Ward 4(1), Narasipuram, Coimbatore Coimbatore – 641 109. Pan: Aaaan 9388H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Sudhakar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Y. Sudarshan, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.09.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R These Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Two Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Both Dated 26.05.2025 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). The Relevant Assessment Years Are 2017-18 & 2020-21. 2. The Solitary Issue Raised Is Whether The First Appellate Authority (Faa) Is Justified In Confirming The Ao’S Action In Denying The Claim Of Deduction U/S.80P Of The Act.

disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection of the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions of Section 80A

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection of the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions of Section 80A

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection of the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions of Section 80A

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act primarily on two grounds. The first objection of the AO is with regard to claim of deduction in the light of provisions of Section 80A

ANGALAKSHMI SPINNING MILL,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-4, COIMBATORE

The Appeal is dismissed qua the issue of the extent of deduction under Section 80-IA of the Act

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2260/Chny/2025 िनधा#रण वष# /Assessment Year: 2018-19

disallowance warranted. The A.O however did not accept the submissions of the assessee and held that interest income which is to be taxed under the head income from other sources cannot be included in the gross total income against which deduction under section 80IA of the Act is to be claimed. Accordingly the AO restricted the deduction u/s.80IA and made

ARUNA ALLOY STEELS PRIVATES LIMITED,MADURAI vs. ACIT,CORP. CIRCLE-1, MADURAI, MADURAIQ

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

80A(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: (5) Where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under section 10-A or section 10-AA or section 10-B or section 10-BA or under any provision of this Chapter under the heading "C.-Deductions in respect of certain incomes", no deduction

DIGVIJAI POLYTEX PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJAPALAYAM vs. ACIT CORP CIRCLE, MADURAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.343/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Digvijai Polytex Private Limited, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of 61, Kumarasamy Raja Nagar, Income Tax, Rajapalayam 626 108. Corporate Circle, Madurai. [Pan: Aaacd 9673K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. J. Prabhakar & Shri. S. Muralidhar, Chartered Accountants. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl. Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.06.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri ()

80A(4) in respect of wind mill unit amounting to Rs.17,34,173/-. The CPC, Bangalore after processing return sent intimation under section 143(1) dated 01.05.2020 wherein the deduction under section 80IA(4) has been restricted to the extent of Rs.4,64,927/- as against Rs.17,34,173/- claimed by the appellant. Meaning thereby, deduction was disallowed

THE PALLIPALAYAM FRMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO CIRCLE 1, , ERODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.964/Chny/2024 िनधा8रण वष8 /Assessment Year: 2018-19

disallowance of claim for deduction u/s 80P of the Act invoking the provisions of section 80AC that assessee is not eligible for deduction u/s 80P as return has been filed beyond the due date specified u/s 139(1) of the Act. The AO has also held on merit that interest income is neither allowable

MADHEMANGALAM PRIMARY AGRICULATURAL CO OP SOCIETY,DHARMAPURI vs. ITO, WARD-1, DHARMAPURI, DHARMAPURI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.84/Chny/2024 िनधा8रण वष8 /Assessment Year: 2017-18

disallowance of claim u/s. 80P of the Act on the ground that the assessee return was treated as non-est and as per Section 80A

FAIVELEY TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD.,HOSUR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)

80A, which is applicable for deductions to be claimed u/s 80C to 80U in computing total income, states the following: "Where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under section 104 or section 10AA or section 10B or section 10BA or under any provision of this Chapter under the heading "C.-Deductions

MARUDHAMALAI SRE DHANDAPANI SPINNING MILLS,KARAMADAI vs. DCIT,CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 11/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Marudhamalai Sri Dhandapani Deputy Commissioner Of Spinning Mills, V. Income Tax, 142B Bettathapuram Pudur, Centralized Processing Centre, Karmadai Post – 641 104. Bengaluru – 560 500. [Pan: Aagfm-4590-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

section 80A(5) only requires filing of return, but nowhere it suggest that claim should be made in the original return and not by way of original return, further when the original return of income was filed within the due date, then the revised return filed, thereafter before completion of assessment proceedings is to be considered by the Assessing Officer

PARAPPATTU P A C C S LTD Y 58,KANYAKUMARI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 NAGERCOIL, NAGERCOIL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.141/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2019-20 Parappattu Paccs Ltd Y 58, The Income Tax Officer, No.11-65/3, Alvaar Nagar, Ward-1, Manavalakurichi S.O, Nagercoil. Kalkulam, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu-629 252. [Pan : Aabtp9691H] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr.M.Karunandham, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.07.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

section 80AC and 80A(5) were attracted. Accordingly, the Ld.AO denied the impugned addition. The Ld. DR further informed that the assessee once again chose to remain non-compliant to the statutory notices of the Ld.CIT(A). It was submitted that the cash deposits represent loan repayments of principal and interest amount taken by the members as well as sale