BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 54Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19Delhi18Bangalore14Kolkata8Jaipur7Agra6Pune5Karnataka5Indore5Chennai5Ahmedabad4Rajkot4Visakhapatnam2Hyderabad2Jodhpur2Chandigarh1Cochin1Cuttack1Raipur1SC1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6Section 546Section 271(1)(c)6Section 54G5Deduction5Capital Gains4Long Term Capital Gains4Section 1473Exemption3Section 148

ACIT, MADURAI vs. M/S. STANDARD FIREWORKS PVT. LTD., SIVAKASI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2654/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2654/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2014-15 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Standard Fireworks (P) Ltd., Income Tax, Central Circle 2, Vs. No. 1/3, Thiruthangal Road, Madurai. Sivakasi 626 123. [Pan:Aaccs1480M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. R. Anita, Jcit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Arjunraj, Ca For Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 31.03.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 09.04.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, Dated 27.06.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2014-15 Passed Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short]. In The Grounds Of Appeal, The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds: “1. The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Is Erroneous On Facts Of The Case & In Law. 2. The Ld. Cit(A) Failed To Note That The Assessee Had Only Shifted A Part Of The Industrial Undertaking & Not As Whole.

For Appellant: Ms. R. Anita, JCITFor Respondent: Shri Arjunraj, CA for Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)
2
Section 2(47)(v)2
Section 153A2
Section 54G

Section 54G was disallowed and an amount of Rs.50,36,72,654/- was assessed under the head 'capital gains'. 7. As against

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. KANNAN SANTHANAM, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 636/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Sept 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.636/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri Kannan Santhanam, Income Tax, V. 401-A Laures 59-60, Non Corporate Circle 16, C.P. Ramasamy Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 034. Chennai - 600 018. Pan : Aahps 1094 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Shiva Srinivas, JCITFor Respondent: Shri P.B. Srinivasan, CA
Section 139(1)Section 2Section 54

disallowed the claim of the assessee. 5. On the contrary, Shri P.B. Srinivasan, the Ld. representative for the assessee, submitted that the assessee admittedly sold a residential flat at Santhome High Road, Chennai, on 09.03.2011 for a total consideration of `1,09,00,000/-. The capital gain computed by the assessee to the extent of `64,84,686/- was admitted

ELANGO ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1,, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 314/CHNY/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Suraj Nahar, C.A ""For Respondent: Ms. D.Komali Krishna,CIT
Section 133Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 54G

section 54G afresh. Consequently, the AO vide order passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act dated 31.12.2018 disallowed the deduction

PENUPETRUNI CHINNA RAO,CHENNAI vs. ITO, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, WARD-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal stand partly allowed

ITA 401/CHNY/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.401/Chny/2022 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Mr. Penupatruni Chinna Rao Ito बनाम 8, Pughs Road, Sundaram Salai, International Taxation, / Vs. R.A. Puram, Chennai-600 028. Ward-1(1), Chennai. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aecpc-1481-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Ms. N.V. Lakshmi (Advocate) - Ld. Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal (Jcit)- Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Final Hearing : 04-03-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 25-04-2024 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Ms. N.V. Lakshmi (Advocate) - Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal (JCIT)- Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(47)(v)Section 50C(1)Section 54Section 54B

section 54, among all the flats as against cost exclusively incurred for two of appellant's flats which were joined together as one unit. 1.2 The Ld. AR has filed additional grounds of appeal which read as under: - The assessing officer erred in making disallowance of part of indexed cost of acquisition in a limited scrutiny to verify the large

ADHI KUMARA GURU,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NCC-22(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 120/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaमाननीय "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" एवं माननीय "ी अिमताभ शु"ा, लेखा सद" के सम"

For Appellant: Mr. P.M. Kathir, Advocate for Mr.G.Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 54F

54G, and 54GA.” A scrutiny assessment order was subsequently passed on 28.11.2016, assessing the total income at subsequently passed on 28.11.2016, assessing the total income at subsequently passed on 28.11.2016, assessing the total income at Rs.61,77,060/- after disallowing the cost of improvement of after disallowing the cost of improvement of after disallowing the cost of improvement of Rs.15