BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “disallowance”+ Section 27Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi34Mumbai15Ahmedabad2Chandigarh1Chennai1Indore1Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)4Section 142(1)2

TRAC MEDIA PVT. LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-20(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3149/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.3149/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Trac Media Pvt. Ltd., The Assistant Commissioner Of No. 35, 3Rd Main Road, Kalaimagal Income Tax, Nagar, Ekkattuthangal, Corporate Circle 20(1), Vs. Chennai 600 032. Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aadct4184G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 10.02.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 9, New Delhi Dated 09.08.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2016-17. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds: “1. The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Is Contrary To Law, Facts Of The Case & Material On Record. 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) & The Assessing Officer Failed To Afford Sufficient Opportunity Of Being Heard To The Appellant Before Passing Exparte Order.

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(2)
Section 144
Section 68

disallowance of 50% of expenses and in treating the ‘Trade Payable’ in the sum of ₹.6,48,34,964/- as income under Sec. 68 of the Act. 5. For these grounds and such other grounds as may be adduced either before or during the appeal proceedings, the appellant prays that the Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to set aside