BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

36 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai50Delhi41Chennai36Bangalore32Kolkata20Indore19Jaipur16Hyderabad14Ahmedabad11Agra9Pune7Panaji6Surat6Cochin5Visakhapatnam3Chandigarh2Raipur2SC1Lucknow1Jabalpur1Rajkot1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D81Section 271E42Section 269S33Section 26328Penalty26Section 40A(3)16Addition to Income15Section 13213Disallowance10Section 147

DCIT, CENTRALCIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM THANU, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross

ITA 787/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.785, 786, 787 & 788/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 40, 41, 42 & 43/Chny/2023 (In I.T.A. Nos.785 To 788/Chny/2023)

For Respondent: Shri A. Sasi Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 269TSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

section 271D of the Act, whereas, against various additions including disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the Assessing

Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

9
Section 153A9
Deduction5

DCIT, CENTRALCIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM THANU, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross

ITA 788/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.785, 786, 787 & 788/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 40, 41, 42 & 43/Chny/2023 (In I.T.A. Nos.785 To 788/Chny/2023)

For Respondent: Shri A. Sasi Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 269TSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

section 271D of the Act, whereas, against various additions including disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the Assessing

DCIT, CENTRALCIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM THANU, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross

ITA 785/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.785, 786, 787 & 788/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 40, 41, 42 & 43/Chny/2023 (In I.T.A. Nos.785 To 788/Chny/2023)

For Respondent: Shri A. Sasi Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 269TSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

section 271D of the Act, whereas, against various additions including disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the Assessing

DCIT, CENTRALCIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM THANU, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as Cross

ITA 786/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.785, 786, 787 & 788/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 & C.O. Nos. 40, 41, 42 & 43/Chny/2023 (In I.T.A. Nos.785 To 788/Chny/2023)

For Respondent: Shri A. Sasi Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 269TSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

section 271D of the Act, whereas, against various additions including disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the Assessing

P.SENTHIL KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 3398/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3397 & 3398/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2012-13. Shri. P. Senthil Kumar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, P-2, Hig Adyar Apartments, Non Corporate Ward 3(3) Kottur Gardens, Chennai. Circular Road, Kotturpuram, Chennai 600 086. [Pan Abbps 1019H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Durai Pandian, Sr. A.R
Section 271BSection 40A(3)

disallowance if any, which is needed u/s.40A(3) of ITA Nos.3397 & 3398/Mds/16 :- 6 -: the Act back to the file of the ld. Assessing Officer for consideration afresh in accordance with law. 8. Now, we take appeal of the assessee in ITA No.3398/Mds/2016. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that levy of penalty 9. u/s.271B of the Act was not warranted

P.SENTHIL KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 3397/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3397 & 3398/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2012-13. Shri. P. Senthil Kumar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, P-2, Hig Adyar Apartments, Non Corporate Ward 3(3) Kottur Gardens, Chennai. Circular Road, Kotturpuram, Chennai 600 086. [Pan Abbps 1019H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Durai Pandian, Sr. A.R
Section 271BSection 40A(3)

disallowance if any, which is needed u/s.40A(3) of ITA Nos.3397 & 3398/Mds/16 :- 6 -: the Act back to the file of the ld. Assessing Officer for consideration afresh in accordance with law. 8. Now, we take appeal of the assessee in ITA No.3398/Mds/2016. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that levy of penalty 9. u/s.271B of the Act was not warranted

ARIEF NAGOOR ARIEF,CHENNAI vs. DCIT NON CORP CIRCLE 11, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1261/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1261/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, JCIT
Section 269SSection 271DSection 68

disallowance under Section 68 of the Act treating the funds said to be received by the assessee from others as the assessee’s own funds and also levied penalty under Section 271D

VASAN MEDICAL CENTRE (INDIA) P LTD.,TRICHY vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRLA RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2202/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN HEALTHCARE P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRAL RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2196/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN HEALTHCARE P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRAL RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2197/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN MEDICAL CENTRE (INDIA) P LTD.,TRICHY vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRLA RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2198/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN MEDICAL CENTRE (INDIA) P LTD.,TRICHY vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRLA RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2199/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN MEDICAL CENTRE (INDIA) P LTD.,TRICHY vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRLA RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2200/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN MEDICAL CENTRE (INDIA) P LTD.,TRICHY vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRLA RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2201/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN MEDICAL CENTRE (INDIA) P LTD.,TRICHY vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRLA RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2203/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN MEDICAL CENTRE (INDIA) P LTD.,TRICHY vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRLA RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2205/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN MEDICAL CENTRE (INDIA) P LTD.,TRICHY vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRLA RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2204/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN HEALTHCARE P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRAL RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2194/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

VASAN HEALTHCARE P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRAL RANGE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee M/s

ITA 2195/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Dr.Srinivasa Rao, CIT D.R
Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

sections 271D & 271E of the Act was liable to be deleted and it was replied by ld.D.R that the penalties as levied by the ld. Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld.CIT(A), were liable to confirmed. 10. To examine as to whether there has been any additions in the course of assessments on account of the alleged unaccounted transactions

SAI TELECOM,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2534/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manjunatha. Gआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2534/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Sai Telecom, The Income Tax Officer, No.407, 4Th Floor, Kaveri Complex, Vs. Non Corporate Ward-3(3), Nungambakkam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 034. [Pan: Abrfs-4178-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Arv Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2023

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 68

section 271D r.w.s. 269 SS of the Act.” 2.3 Before us also, the assessee filed the same details in his paper book consisting of Item Nos. 3 to 9 from pages 16 to 85. The assessee before us could not establish that these persons have creditworthiness or source of income to prove that the advances given to assessee firm