BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

141 results for “disallowance”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai568Delhi436Chennai141Bangalore137Jaipur98Chandigarh94Kolkata84Hyderabad72Ahmedabad59Cuttack51Indore42Jodhpur41Amritsar41Allahabad26Pune20Cochin13Rajkot12Lucknow9Varanasi8Surat7Raipur7Agra5Guwahati5Visakhapatnam5Ranchi3Calcutta3Dehradun3Telangana2SC2Karnataka2Nagpur2Punjab & Haryana2Patna1Rajasthan1Panaji1

Key Topics

Disallowance64Addition to Income49Deduction44Section 143(3)41Section 80P(2)(d)36Section 271D28Section 43B24Section 4020Section 80P19Exemption

SAI TELECOM,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2534/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manjunatha. Gआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2534/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Sai Telecom, The Income Tax Officer, No.407, 4Th Floor, Kaveri Complex, Vs. Non Corporate Ward-3(3), Nungambakkam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 034. [Pan: Abrfs-4178-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Arv Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2023

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 68

section 271D r.w.s. 269 SS of the Act.” 2.3 Before us also, the assessee filed the same details in his paper book consisting of Item Nos. 3 to 9 from pages 16 to 85. The assessee before us could not establish that these persons have creditworthiness or source of income to prove that the advances given to assessee firm

Showing 1–20 of 141 · Page 1 of 8

...
19
Section 14818
Section 26915

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. V.A. TECH WABAG LIMITED, CHENNAI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 953/CHNY/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Dr. S. Palanikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92B

disallowed the payments made on account of engineering services rendered by third parties outside India by holding the same as if for technical services and added back to the returned income of the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred objections before DRP. 23. The DRP accepted the objections of the assessee and reverse the finding of the A.O by observing

VA TECH WABAG LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 807/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Dr. S. Palanikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92B

disallowed the payments made on account of engineering services rendered by third parties outside India by holding the same as if for technical services and added back to the returned income of the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred objections before DRP. 23. The DRP accepted the objections of the assessee and reverse the finding of the A.O by observing

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(2) , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 1584/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 426/CHNY/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

ACITCORPORATE CIRCLE-3(1) , CHENNAI vs. M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 129/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(2) , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 1585/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(2), CHENNAI vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 1670/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 639/CHNY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 1085/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(2) , CHENNAI vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 1571/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

UNITED INIDA INSURANCE CO. LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 42/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

UNITED INIDA INSURANCE CO. LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 13/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

ACITCORPORATE CIRCLE-3(1) , CHENNAI vs. M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 130/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

ACITCORPORATE CIRCLE-3(1) , CHENNAI vs. M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 128/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(2), CHENNAI vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and Revenue are

ITA 1671/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Ms. V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing
Section 14ASection 195Section 40

Section ll5JB of the Act. c.The CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition to the Book Profits (u/s 115JB of the Act) to the extent of the amount disallowed u/s 14A by the Appellant under the normal computation of the Act, even though the exempt income in the computation of Book Profits is lower than the amount under the normal

M/S. J.G. EXPORTS,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 2375/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Abraham P.George & Shri George Mathanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2372, 2373, 2374, 2375, 2376, 2377 & 2378/ Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008- 09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-2012. M/S. Jg Exports, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No.55, Narayanamudali Business Circle X (2) Street, Chennai 600 006. Chennai 600 079. [Pan Aaafj 3129M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, Advocate
Section 269Section 27Section 53A

disallowance of the claim of lease rental paid on the land. 4. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee had for assessment year 2005-06 shown the income from rental under the head ‘’Income from Business/Profession’’. However, according to him, for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-2011, assessee had shown such rental income under the head

M/S. J.G. EXPORTS,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 2377/CHNY/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Abraham P.George & Shri George Mathanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2372, 2373, 2374, 2375, 2376, 2377 & 2378/ Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008- 09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-2012. M/S. Jg Exports, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No.55, Narayanamudali Business Circle X (2) Street, Chennai 600 006. Chennai 600 079. [Pan Aaafj 3129M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, Advocate
Section 269Section 27Section 53A

disallowance of the claim of lease rental paid on the land. 4. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee had for assessment year 2005-06 shown the income from rental under the head ‘’Income from Business/Profession’’. However, according to him, for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-2011, assessee had shown such rental income under the head

M/S. J.G. EXPORTS,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 2372/CHNY/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Abraham P.George & Shri George Mathanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2372, 2373, 2374, 2375, 2376, 2377 & 2378/ Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008- 09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-2012. M/S. Jg Exports, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No.55, Narayanamudali Business Circle X (2) Street, Chennai 600 006. Chennai 600 079. [Pan Aaafj 3129M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, Advocate
Section 269Section 27Section 53A

disallowance of the claim of lease rental paid on the land. 4. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee had for assessment year 2005-06 shown the income from rental under the head ‘’Income from Business/Profession’’. However, according to him, for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-2011, assessee had shown such rental income under the head

M/S. J.G. EXPORTS,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 2374/CHNY/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Oct 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Abraham P.George & Shri George Mathanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2372, 2373, 2374, 2375, 2376, 2377 & 2378/ Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008- 09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-2012. M/S. Jg Exports, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No.55, Narayanamudali Business Circle X (2) Street, Chennai 600 006. Chennai 600 079. [Pan Aaafj 3129M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, Advocate
Section 269Section 27Section 53A

disallowance of the claim of lease rental paid on the land. 4. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee had for assessment year 2005-06 shown the income from rental under the head ‘’Income from Business/Profession’’. However, according to him, for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-2011, assessee had shown such rental income under the head