BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

444 results for “disallowance”+ Section 2(24)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,826Delhi1,644Chennai444Jaipur408Bangalore405Ahmedabad306Hyderabad304Kolkata271Indore213Chandigarh206Raipur197Pune167Surat143Rajkot139Cochin115Visakhapatnam99Amritsar95Lucknow59Guwahati58Nagpur57SC53Patna37Panaji35Jodhpur32Ranchi30Allahabad29Agra21Cuttack20Dehradun17Varanasi11Jabalpur5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)47Section 153A47Addition to Income46Disallowance39Deduction31Section 4026Section 26325Section 13215Section 115J15Section 14A

VICTUS DYEINGS ,TIRUPUR vs. ACIT , CIRCLE-1, TIRUPUR

ITA 706/CHNY/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2017-2018
Section 28

disallowance on weighted deduction under\nsection 35(2AB) of the Act, accordingly, the Assessing Officer determined\nthe income of the assessee at ₹.36,61,77,500/- vide order dated\n04.07.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Act.\n6.\nAggrieved by the said order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee\nchallenged the same before

KM KNIT WEAR,TIRUPUR vs. ADIT,CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, ITA Nos. 3326/Chny/2019, 326/Chny/2024 &\n768/Chny/2022 are dismissed; ITA No

ITA 358/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2018-19
Section 28

disallowance on weighted deduction under\nsection 35(2AB) of the Act, accordingly, the Assessing Officer determined\nthe income of the assessee at ₹.36,61,77,500/- vide order dated\n04.07.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Act.\n6.\nAggrieved by the said order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee\nchallenged the same before

Showing 1–20 of 444 · Page 1 of 23

...
15
Section 153C14
TDS10

GEENA GARMENTS,TIRUPPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, TIRUPPUR, TIRUPPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1348/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3326/Chny/2019 & 326/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P) Ltd., No. 10, 12, 2Nd Street, Kumar Income Tax, Circle 1(1), 121, Adams Buildings, 60 Feet Road, Nagar South, Tirupur 641 603. Tirupur 641 602. [Pan: Aaccc0952E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.706/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Victus Dyeings, The Assistant Commissioner Of 410, P.N. Road, R.K. Nagar, Income Tax, Circle 1, Vs. Tirupur 641 601. Tirupur. [Pan: Aacfv4420D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.768/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. K.M. Knit Wear, Income Tax, Circle 1, 14, E.F. Lakshmi Nagar, First Street, Vs. Tirupur. City Garden, Tirupur 641 602. [Pan: Aacfk3053B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.358/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. K.M. Knit Wear, The Assistant Commissioner Of 14, E.F. Lakshmi Nagar, First Street, Income Tax, Circle 1, Vs. City Garden, Tirupur 641 602. Tirupur. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 28

disallowance on weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Act, accordingly, the Assessing Officer determined the income of the assessee at ₹.36,61,77,500/- vide order dated 04.07.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Act. 6. Aggrieved by the said order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee challenged the same before

GATES WEARS,TIRUPPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1, TIRUPPUR

In the result, ITA Nos. 3326/Chny/2019, 326/Chny/2024 &\n768/Chny/2022 are dismissed; ITA No

ITA 1014/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2020-21
Section 28

disallowance on weighted deduction under\nsection 35(2AB) of the Act, accordingly, the Assessing Officer determined\nthe income of the assessee at ₹.36,61,77,500/- vide order dated\n04.07.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Act.\n6.\nAggrieved by the said order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee\nchallenged the same before

SAN TEX INC.,TIRUPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, TIRUPUR

ITA 94/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2017-18
Section 28

disallowance on weighted deduction under\nsection 35(2AB) of the Act, accordingly, the Assessing Officer determined\nthe income of the assessee at ₹.36,61,77,500/- vide order dated\n04.07.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Act.\n6.\nAggrieved by the said order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee\nchallenged the same before

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1, TIRUPPUR vs. EASTMAN EXPORTS GLOBAL CLOTHING P LTD, TIRUPPUR,TAMILNADU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 326/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3326/Chny/2019 & 326/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P) Ltd., No. 10, 12, 2Nd Street, Kumar Income Tax, Circle 1(1), 121, Adams Buildings, 60 Feet Road, Nagar South, Tirupur 641 603. Tirupur 641 602. [Pan: Aaccc0952E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.706/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Victus Dyeings, The Assistant Commissioner Of 410, P.N. Road, R.K. Nagar, Income Tax, Circle 1, Vs. Tirupur 641 601. Tirupur. [Pan: Aacfv4420D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.768/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. K.M. Knit Wear, Income Tax, Circle 1, 14, E.F. Lakshmi Nagar, First Street, Vs. Tirupur. City Garden, Tirupur 641 602. [Pan: Aacfk3053B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.358/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. K.M. Knit Wear, The Assistant Commissioner Of 14, E.F. Lakshmi Nagar, First Street, Income Tax, Circle 1, Vs. City Garden, Tirupur 641 602. Tirupur. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 28

disallowance on weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Act, accordingly, the Assessing Officer determined the income of the assessee at ₹.36,61,77,500/- vide order dated 04.07.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Act. 6. Aggrieved by the said order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee challenged the same before

ACIT, CIRCLE-1, , TIRUPUR vs. EASTMAN EXPORTS GLOBAL CLOTHING (P) LTD., TIRUPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3326/CHNY/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3326/Chny/2019 & 326/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P) Ltd., No. 10, 12, 2Nd Street, Kumar Income Tax, Circle 1(1), 121, Adams Buildings, 60 Feet Road, Nagar South, Tirupur 641 603. Tirupur 641 602. [Pan: Aaccc0952E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.706/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Victus Dyeings, The Assistant Commissioner Of 410, P.N. Road, R.K. Nagar, Income Tax, Circle 1, Vs. Tirupur 641 601. Tirupur. [Pan: Aacfv4420D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.768/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. K.M. Knit Wear, Income Tax, Circle 1, 14, E.F. Lakshmi Nagar, First Street, Vs. Tirupur. City Garden, Tirupur 641 602. [Pan: Aacfk3053B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.358/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. K.M. Knit Wear, The Assistant Commissioner Of 14, E.F. Lakshmi Nagar, First Street, Income Tax, Circle 1, Vs. City Garden, Tirupur 641 602. Tirupur. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 28

disallowance on weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Act, accordingly, the Assessing Officer determined the income of the assessee at ₹.36,61,77,500/- vide order dated 04.07.2019 passed under section 143(3) of the Act. 6. Aggrieved by the said order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee challenged the same before

MECCA IQBAL AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3094/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

ISRAR AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3091/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

MECCA IQBAL AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3093/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

ASHFAQUE AHMED MECCA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3098/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

ISRAR AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3092/CHNY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

MECCA IQBAL AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3095/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

ASHFAQUE AHMED MECCA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3099/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

ISRAR AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3090/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

MECCA RAFEEEQUE AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3085/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

MECCA RAFEEQUE AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3086/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

MECCA RAFEEQUE AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3087/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

ASHFAQUE AHMED MECCA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3100/CHNY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed

MECCA RAFEEQUE AHMED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 3088/CHNY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Vinod D. Mudaliar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 2(24)(iv)Section 37(1)

section 2(24)(iv), 17(2)(iv) and 28(iv) of the Act. 9. The First Appellate Authority in the impugned order erred in ITA Nos.3085 to 3100/CHNY/2024 confirming the addition made by the assessing officer towards credit card payments u/s 2(24)(iv) of the Act. As mentioned earlier, the company had already disallowed