ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, COIMBATORE vs. S.MARTIN, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2382/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3146 & 3147/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri S. Martin, Income Tax, V. No.335-339, Daisy Plaza, 6Th Street, Gandhipuram, Central Circle -2, Income Tax Building, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 011. Coimbatore – 641 018. Pan : Aewpm 3703 Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that such a claim was not substantiated, whether there was any concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income? This issue was considered by the Apex Court in the case of Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. (supra). The Apex Court found that mere claim of expenditure would not amount to furnishing

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, COIMBATORE vs. S.MARTIN, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2382/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3146 & 3147/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri S. Martin, Income Tax, V. No.335-339, Daisy Plaza, 6Th Street, Gandhipuram, Central Circle -2, Income Tax Building, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 011. Coimbatore – 641 018. Pan : Aewpm 3703 Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that such a claim was not substantiated, whether there was any concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income? This issue was considered by the Apex Court in the case of Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. (supra). The Apex Court found that mere claim of expenditure would not amount to furnishing

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI vs. RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and the assessee as\nwell as the Cross-Objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA Nos.2978 - 2984/Chny/2024\n&\nCO Nos.11-17/Chny/2025\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23\n\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-2(1),\nChennai.\nM/s Radiance Realty-\nDevelopers India Ltd.,\nRadiance Towers, 1st Floor,\n33 Feet Road, Anna Salai,\nGuindy, Chennai – 600 032.\n[PAN: AACCN5152H]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross\nObjector)\n\nITA Nos.2971 - 2972/Chny/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/A

section 40A(2) of the Act. The provisions\nof Section 40A(2) of the Act, deals with disallowance of excessive or\nunreasonable payments made by an assessee to related parties. The\nsection allows the AO to scrutinize payments made to specific persons or\nentities related to the assessee, to ensure that such payments are not\nexcessive or unreasonable compared

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI vs. RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and the assessee as\nwell as the Cross-Objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA Nos.2978 - 2984/Chny/2024\n&\nCO Nos.11-17/Chny/2025\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23\n\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-2(1),\nChennai.\nM/s Radiance Realty-\nDevelopers India Ltd.,\nRadiance Towers, 1st Floor,\n33 Feet Road, Anna Salai,\nGuindy, Chennai – 600 032.\n[PAN: AACCN5152H]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross\nObjector)\n\nITA Nos.2971 - 2972/Chny/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/

disallowing the salary\npayment(s) was justified, since the salary expense(s) was not business\nbut personal in nature. The Ld. AR has however has rightly pointed out\nthat, disallowance could not have been solely based on the statement of\nSmt. Viswanathan and that some corroborative evidence ought to have\nbeen brought on record to justify the impugned disallowance

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI vs. RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and the assessee as\nwell as the Cross-Objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA Nos.2978 - 2984/Chny/2024\n&\nCO Nos.11-17/Chny/2025\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23\n\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-2(1),\nChennai.\nM/s Radiance Realty-\nDevelopers India Ltd.,\nRadiance Towers, 1st Floor,\n33 Feet Road, Anna Salai,\nGuindy, Chennai – 600 032.\n[PAN: AACCN5152H]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross\nObjector)\n\nITA Nos.2971 - 2972/Chny/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/

Disallowance\nof salary\npaid\nto\nViswanathan\nwithout any\nservices\n| 8,21,667 | 8,21,667 | 8,48,667 | 8,31,000 | 8,31,000 | 8,19,660 | 8,19,660\n| 7.\n| Addition u/s\n40A(3) & 37\n| -\n| -\n| 5,00,00,000 | -\n| -\n| -\n| -\n\n3.\nIt is noted that the reasoning given

RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), CHENNAI

Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA Nos.2978 - 2984/Chny/2024\n&\nCO Nos.11-17/Chny/2025\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23\n\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-2(1),\nChennai.\nM/s Radiance Realty-\nDevelopers India Ltd.,\nRadiance Towers, 1st Floor,\n33 Feet Road, Anna Salai,\nGuindy, Chennai – 600 032.\n[PAN: AACCN5152H]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross\nObjector)\n\nITA Nos.2971 - 2972/Chny/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/

158B of the Act, which defines\n\"undisclosed income\" as including inter alia any income based on an\nentry in the books of accounts or other documents or transactions\nrepresenting whole or part of the income, which has not been or would\nnot have been disclosed for the purposes of this Act. The provision does\nnot permit

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI vs. RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and the assessee as\nwell as the Cross-Objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA Nos.2978 - 2984/Chny/2024\n&\nCO Nos.11-17/Chny/2025\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23\n\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-2(1),\nChennai.\nM/s Radiance Realty-\nDevelopers India Ltd.,\nRadiance Towers, 1st Floor,\n33 Feet Road, Anna Salai,\nGuindy, Chennai – 600 032.\n[PAN: AACCN5152H]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross\nObjector)\n\nITA Nos.2971 - 2972/Chny/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/

158B of the Act, which defines\n\"undisclosed income\" as including inter alia any income based on an\nentry in the books of accounts or other documents or transactions\nrepresenting whole or part of the income, which has not been or would\nnot have been disclosed for the purposes of this Act. The provision does\nnot permit

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI vs. RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and the assessee as\nwell as the Cross-Objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA Nos.2978 - 2984/Chny/2024\n&\nCO Nos.11-17/Chny/2025\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23\n\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-2(1),\nChennai.\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\nM/s Radiance Realty-\nDevelopers India Ltd.,\nRadiance Towers, 1st Floor,\n33 Feet Road, Anna Salai,\nGuindy, Chennai – 600 032.\n[PAN: AACCN5152H]\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross\nObjector)\n\nITA Nos.2971 - 2972/Chny/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/

158B of the Act, which defines\n\"undisclosed income\" as including inter alia any income based on an\nentry in the books of accounts or other documents or transactions\nrepresenting whole or part of the income, which has not been or would\nnot have been disclosed for the purposes of this Act. The provision does\nnot permit

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI vs. RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LTD., CHENNAI

Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA Nos.2978 - 2984/Chny/2024\n&\nCO Nos.11-17/Chny/2025\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23\n\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-2(1),\nChennai.\nM/s Radiance Realty-\nDevelopers India Ltd.,\nRadiance Towers, 1st Floor,\n33 Feet Road, Anna Salai,\nGuindy, Chennai – 600 032.\n[PAN: AACCN5152H]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross\nObjector)\n\nITA Nos.2971 - 2972/Chny/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/

158B of the Act, which defines\n\"undisclosed income\" as including inter alia any income based on an\nentry in the books of accounts or other documents or transactions\nrepresenting whole or part of the income, which has not been or would\nnot have been disclosed for the purposes of this Act. The provision does\nnot permit

RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), CHENNAI

Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA Nos.2978 - 2984/Chny/2024\n&\nCO Nos.11-17/Chny/2025\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2022-23\n\nThe DCIT,\nCentral Circle-2(1),\nChennai.\nM/s Radiance Realty-\nDevelopers India Ltd.,\nRadiance Towers, 1st Floor,\n33 Feet Road, Anna Salai,\nGuindy, Chennai – 600 032.\n[PAN: AACCN5152H]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross\nObjector)\n\nITA Nos.2971 - 2972/Chny/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/

158B of the Act, which defines\n\"undisclosed income\" as including inter alia any income based on an\nentry in the books of accounts or other documents or transactions\nrepresenting whole or part of the income, which has not been or would\nnot have been disclosed for the purposes of this Act. The provision does\nnot permit