BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 158Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai82Bangalore47Delhi37Hyderabad28Jaipur14Chandigarh14Pune9Nagpur6Karnataka5Cochin5Chennai4Lucknow4SC2Indore2Guwahati2Rajkot2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Telangana1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 14A9Disallowance4Addition to Income4Section 271(1)(c)3Section 1323Short Term Capital Gains3Deduction3Penalty3TDS3Condonation of Delay

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI vs. RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 2982/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.T.Banusekar, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 148

Disallowance 8,21,667 8,21,667 8,21,667 8,48,667 8,31,000 8,31,000 8,19,660 8,19,660 of salary paid to Viswanathan without any services 7. Addition u/s - - 5,00,00,000 - - - - 40A(3) & 37 3. It is noted that the reasoning given by the AO for making the above

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, COIMBATORE vs. S.MARTIN, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3147/CHNY/2017[2015-16]Status: Disposed
3
Section 1482
Section 143(3)2
ITAT Chennai
05 Oct 2018
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2382/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3146 & 3147/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri S. Martin, Income Tax, V. No.335-339, Daisy Plaza, 6Th Street, Gandhipuram, Central Circle -2, Income Tax Building, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 011. Coimbatore – 641 018. Pan : Aewpm 3703 Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sailendra Mamidi, PCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that such a claim was not substantiated, whether there was any concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income? This issue was considered by the Apex Court in the case of Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. (supra). The Apex Court found that mere claim of expenditure would not amount to furnishing

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, COIMBATORE vs. S.MARTIN, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3146/CHNY/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Oct 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2382/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3146 & 3147/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri S. Martin, Income Tax, V. No.335-339, Daisy Plaza, 6Th Street, Gandhipuram, Central Circle -2, Income Tax Building, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 011. Coimbatore – 641 018. Pan : Aewpm 3703 Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sailendra Mamidi, PCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that such a claim was not substantiated, whether there was any concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income? This issue was considered by the Apex Court in the case of Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. (supra). The Apex Court found that mere claim of expenditure would not amount to furnishing

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. SHRI S. MARTIN, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2382/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2382/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3146 & 3147/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri S. Martin, Income Tax, V. No.335-339, Daisy Plaza, 6Th Street, Gandhipuram, Central Circle -2, Income Tax Building, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 011. Coimbatore – 641 018. Pan : Aewpm 3703 Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sailendra Mamidi, PCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

disallowed the claim of the assessee on the ground that such a claim was not substantiated, whether there was any concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income? This issue was considered by the Apex Court in the case of Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. (supra). The Apex Court found that mere claim of expenditure would not amount to furnishing