BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 12A(1)(ba)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi20Pune19Bangalore16Mumbai14Kolkata12Hyderabad7Chennai7Indore7Ahmedabad6Jaipur5Jodhpur3Surat2Cochin1Patna1Chandigarh1Guwahati1Raipur1Rajkot1SC1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 12A29Section 1123Section 13916Section 139(1)14Section 143(1)9Section 1548Exemption7Section 139(4)5Section 123Rectification u/s 154

M/S. SUSILA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1095/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2024AY 2018-19
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 270A

ba) in Sub section (1) of section 12A is quoted as under:\n\"the entities registered under section 12AA are required to file\nreturn of income under sub-section (4A) of section 139 of the\nIncome-tax Act, if the total income without giving effect to the\nprovisions of sections 11 and 12 exceeds the maximum amount\nwhich

3
Deduction3
Disallowance2

HARI FOUNDATION,COIMBATORE vs. DLC-CA-(211)(1), ACIT EXEMPTIONS, COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 917/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.917/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 V. Hari Foundation, The Acit (Exemptions), 3-1, Indira Nagar, Coimbatore. Kuniamuthur S.O., Coimbatore-641 035. [Pan: Aabth 2056 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri AG. SathyanarayanaFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ba)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 154

disallowed the exemption u/s.11 of the Act alleging failure on the part of the assessee to file the Audit Report of the accounts of the Trust (Form 10B) within due time which in this case was 15.02.2021 and the assessee belatedly filed the same within ‘32’ days on 20.03.2021 (refer rectification order u/s.154 of the CPC). According to the Ld.AR

PALAM RURAL CENTRE,TIRUPPUR vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS,, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and the Stay Application filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 1560/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1560/Chny/2025 & S.A.No.51Chny/2025 [Arising In Ita No.: 1560/Chny/2025] िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2018-19 Palam Rural Centre, The Asst. Commissioner Of Pethampalayam, Vs. Income Tax (Exemptions), Veerapandi S.O., Coimbatore. Tiruppur – 641 605. [Pan: Aaatp-2929-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Edser Raj, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Sita Krishnamoorthy, J.C.I.T.

For Appellant: Shri. Edser Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sita Krishnamoorthy, J.C.I.T
Section 11Section 12ASection 139

12A(1)(ba) of the Act, the assessee was required to file return of income within the due date for getting exemption w/s. 11 and 12 of the I.T.Act. In the impugned assessment year, the gross receipt of the society is Rs.10,22,94,076/-, which consist as under:- :-11-: ITA No.:1560/Chny/2025 & S.A.No.51Chny/2025 Bank Interest

KM EDUCATIONAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT TRUST,VEMBAKOTTAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS, MADURAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 1326/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

Section 10BSection 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ba)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 44A

disallowing the exemption claimed u/s.11 of the Act was that the assessee didn’t e- filed its ITR/RoI, and Audit Report in Form 10B on or before due date as per the Act. On appeal, the Ld.CIT(A) noted that the assessee had filed the return on 30.11.2018, whereas the due-date for filing of return u/s.139(1

SREE VENKATESWARA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KRISHNAGIRI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD,, SALEM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1339/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1338 & 1339/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Sree Venkateswara Educational Trust, The Income Tax Officer, 655/20 & 600, Jagilkathirampatti Vs. Exemptions Ward, Village & Post, Pochampalli Taluk, Salem. Krishnagiri District 635 206. [Pan:Aaits5220J ] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Baskar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 10.12.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.12.2019 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem, Both Dated 25.03.2019 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Passed Against The Order Under Section 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short] As Well As Under Section 154 Of The Act. Against The Order Under Section 154 Of The Act, The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds: “1. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) Is Not Justified In Holding That Non-Allowance Of Expenditure Incurred To Earn Gross Receipts From A College & School Involves A Complex & Debatable Legal Issue.

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 154

ba) to file it in time prescribed by Section 139(1) is only with effect from assessment year 2018-19. 7. Contention that a fresh claim made is to be considered by an appellate authority, ought to have been accepted (105 DTR 317 Chennai and 396 ITR 251 Mds referring to Goetz India

SREE VENKATESWARA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KRISHNAGIRI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD,, SALEM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1338/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1338 & 1339/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Sree Venkateswara Educational Trust, The Income Tax Officer, 655/20 & 600, Jagilkathirampatti Vs. Exemptions Ward, Village & Post, Pochampalli Taluk, Salem. Krishnagiri District 635 206. [Pan:Aaits5220J ] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Baskar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 10.12.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.12.2019 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem, Both Dated 25.03.2019 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Passed Against The Order Under Section 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short] As Well As Under Section 154 Of The Act. Against The Order Under Section 154 Of The Act, The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds: “1. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) Is Not Justified In Holding That Non-Allowance Of Expenditure Incurred To Earn Gross Receipts From A College & School Involves A Complex & Debatable Legal Issue.

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 154

ba) to file it in time prescribed by Section 139(1) is only with effect from assessment year 2018-19. 7. Contention that a fresh claim made is to be considered by an appellate authority, ought to have been accepted (105 DTR 317 Chennai and 396 ITR 251 Mds referring to Goetz India

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS WARD, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. ARULMIGU MADHURAKALIAMMAN TEMPLE, SIRAVACHUR

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1015/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1015/Chny/2025 ननिाारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2017-18 V. Income Tax Officer, Arulmigu Madhurakaliamman Exemptions Ward, Temple, Trichy. Siravachur, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu-621 113. [Pan: Aacaa9147R] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By Ms.T.V.Muthu Abirami, Advocate, प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent By : Ms.R.Anitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2025 : घोर्णाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 28.07.2025

For Respondent: Ms.R.Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 139Section 139(1)

disallowances of exemption for not having registered u/s 12AA is not reasonable when the assessee has obtained the said registration certificate which is also applicable for the assessment year under consideration as held by various case laws. 5.6 The Appellant's contention has been taken into consideration and the benefit of exemption should be available on the date of registration