BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 115Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai110Delhi89Ahmedabad18Kolkata11Jaipur9Chennai6Bangalore4Nagpur3Bombay3Hyderabad1Surat1Indore1Pune1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 115J32Section 14A6Addition to Income6Deduction4TDS4Disallowance4Section 143(3)3

JAYANT PACKAGING PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE WARD 2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2012-13 in ITA No

ITA 732/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Apr 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 730, 731 & 732/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Section 115JSection 14A

section 115J of the Act. Hence, we reject arguments of the assessee and confirm addition made by the AO towards income not reported in books to book profit computed u/s.115JB of the Act. 6 I.TA. Nos.730 to 732/Chny/2018 4. The next issue that came up for our consideration from Ground No.4 of assessee appeal is addition towards disallowance

JAYANT PACKAGING PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE WARD 2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2012-13 in ITA No

ITA 730/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Apr 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 730, 731 & 732/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Section 115JSection 14A

section 115J of the Act. Hence, we reject arguments of the assessee and confirm addition made by the AO towards income not reported in books to book profit computed u/s.115JB of the Act. 6 I.TA. Nos.730 to 732/Chny/2018 4. The next issue that came up for our consideration from Ground No.4 of assessee appeal is addition towards disallowance

JAYANT PACKAGING PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE WARD 2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2012-13 in ITA No

ITA 731/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Apr 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 730, 731 & 732/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Periasamy, JCIT
Section 115JSection 14A

section 115J of the Act. Hence, we reject arguments of the assessee and confirm addition made by the AO towards income not reported in books to book profit computed u/s.115JB of the Act. 6 I.TA. Nos.730 to 732/Chny/2018 4. The next issue that came up for our consideration from Ground No.4 of assessee appeal is addition towards disallowance

MADRAS SUGARS LIMITED,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1, COIMBAOTRE

ITA 433/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)

disallowance of capital expenditure in computation of book profit u/s 115JB did not violate the ratio laid down in the judgement of Supreme court in the case of Apollo Tyres Ltd Vs Commissioner of Income tax 255 ITR 273 (SC) without considering the crux of the case wherein it is held that "The Assessing Officer thereafter has the limited power

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. KDH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1843/CHNY/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)

115J of the I.T. Act but in the assessee's case, the AO has correctly determined the value of closing stock as per accounting principles and as per the provisions of the I.T. Act.” 4. The brief facts are that the assessee is engaged in property development business during the financial year 2011-12 relevant to assessment year

KDH PROPERTIES PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1844/CHNY/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)

115J of the I.T. Act but in the assessee's case, the AO has correctly determined the value of closing stock as per accounting principles and as per the provisions of the I.T. Act.” 4. The brief facts are that the assessee is engaged in property development business during the financial year 2011-12 relevant to assessment year