BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10(2)(xv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi183Mumbai164Jaipur42Chandigarh40SC39Hyderabad27Visakhapatnam23Guwahati22Kolkata17Bangalore16Jodhpur14Nagpur13Ahmedabad12Chennai12Surat12Pune9Raipur8Indore6Rajkot5Lucknow4Cuttack4Ranchi3Amritsar1Allahabad1Cochin1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)24Section 13214Disallowance10Addition to Income10Section 143(3)8Natural Justice7Section 44B6Section 153A6Section 132(4)6Section 250

DCIT, CC2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. JAYAPRIYA COMPANY, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and

ITA 1251/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. Yamuna, CIT
Section 132Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 250

xv) of sub-section (2) of section 10 would be much wider than the one available under sub-section (2) of section 12.” 10.15 The decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian Bank Limited v. CIT [56 ITR 77] is also found to be relevant in the given facts before us. In the decided

4
Section 1484
Business Income3

DCIT, CEN CIR 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. JAYAPRIYA COMPANY, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and

ITA 1252/CHNY/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Sept 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. Yamuna, CIT
Section 132Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 250

xv) of sub-section (2) of section 10 would be much wider than the one available under sub-section (2) of section 12.” 10.15 The decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian Bank Limited v. CIT [56 ITR 77] is also found to be relevant in the given facts before us. In the decided

YCH LOGISTICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KANCHIPURAM, TAMILNADU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE -3(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1330/CHNY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K, Hon’Ble & Shri S.R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1330/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ych Logistics India Private Ltd., Assistant Commissioner Of Plot D V 1, Hi-Tech Sez Phase Ii, V. Income Tax, Sirumangadu Village, Sriperumbudur Corporate Circle -3(2), Taluk, Tamil Nadu 602 105. Chennai. [Pan: Aaacy-2873-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. Ajit Kumar Jain, CA by VirtualFor Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 10ASection 250Section 92C(3)Section 92D

10. The Learned CIT(A) vide order dated 22.09.2023 confirmed the disallowance u/s.10AA of the Act made by the AO. The ld.AR submitted that the AO and the ld.CIT(A) had not denied the fact that the assessee renders services from the SEZ to foreign parties / customers. Before us the ld.AR submitted that the Export has been defined

ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, INTL, TAX 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1240/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Apr 2025AY 2014-15
Section 115ASection 195(2)Section 250Section 44BSection 9(1)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 90

disallowance by invoking the\nprovisions of section 40(a)(i) of the Act. In the circumstances, the finding of\nthe learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and that of the\nAssessing Officer stands reversed.\n7. We may also mention here that we are not in agreement with the\nsubmission of the learned authorised representative that the provisions of\nsection

GOLD AK,TENKASI vs. ITO 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly- allowed for statistical purposes as indicated against each of the issues

ITA 1050/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Murali, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 40A(3)

10. As regards to intervening issue of applicability of provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act and disallowance made by CIT(A) by enhancing the assessment on cash payments, since we have adjudicated the issue of profit rate on unaccounted purchases and consequent sale, the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act did not apply, where estimation

GOLD AK,TENKASI vs. ITO 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly- allowed for statistical purposes as indicated against each of the issues

ITA 1051/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Nov 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Murali, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 40A(3)

10. As regards to intervening issue of applicability of provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act and disallowance made by CIT(A) by enhancing the assessment on cash payments, since we have adjudicated the issue of profit rate on unaccounted purchases and consequent sale, the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act did not apply, where estimation

GOLD AK,TENKASI vs. ITO 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly- allowed for statistical purposes as indicated against each of the issues

ITA 1049/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Nov 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Murali, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 40A(3)

10. As regards to intervening issue of applicability of provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act and disallowance made by CIT(A) by enhancing the assessment on cash payments, since we have adjudicated the issue of profit rate on unaccounted purchases and consequent sale, the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act did not apply, where estimation

GOLD AK,TENKASI vs. ITO 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly- allowed for statistical purposes as indicated against each of the issues

ITA 1046/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Murali, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 40A(3)

10. As regards to intervening issue of applicability of provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act and disallowance made by CIT(A) by enhancing the assessment on cash payments, since we have adjudicated the issue of profit rate on unaccounted purchases and consequent sale, the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act did not apply, where estimation

GOLD AK,TENKASI vs. ITO 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly- allowed for statistical purposes as indicated against each of the issues

ITA 1047/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Murali, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 40A(3)

10. As regards to intervening issue of applicability of provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act and disallowance made by CIT(A) by enhancing the assessment on cash payments, since we have adjudicated the issue of profit rate on unaccounted purchases and consequent sale, the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act did not apply, where estimation

GOLD AK,TENKASI vs. ITO 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly- allowed for statistical purposes as indicated against each of the issues

ITA 1048/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Murali, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 40A(3)

10. As regards to intervening issue of applicability of provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act and disallowance made by CIT(A) by enhancing the assessment on cash payments, since we have adjudicated the issue of profit rate on unaccounted purchases and consequent sale, the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act did not apply, where estimation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. DORMAKABA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, KANCHEEPURAM

In the result the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3299/CHNY/2024[2008]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153Section 92B

Section 10 (2) (xv) of the Act (Indian Income Tax Act, 1922)\nif it satisfies otherwise the tests laid down by the law\".\nConclusion\n47. For the aforementioned reasons, the Court is of the view that as far as the\npresent appeals are concerned, the Revenue has been unable to demonstrate by\nsome tangible material that there is an international

SAI TELECOM,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2534/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manjunatha. Gआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2534/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Sai Telecom, The Income Tax Officer, No.407, 4Th Floor, Kaveri Complex, Vs. Non Corporate Ward-3(3), Nungambakkam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 034. [Pan: Abrfs-4178-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Arv Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2023

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 68

2. The first issue in this appeal of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the action of the A.O in sustaining the addition of Rs. 44,13,610/- being long term borrowings added as loan creditors u/s. 68 of the Act. The following are long term borrowings added by the A.O as loan creditors: Long