Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6,446 results for “disallowance”+ Disallowanceclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai21,875 Delhi16,868 Chennai6,446 Bangalore5,973 Kolkata5,460 Ahmedabad2,781 Pune2,736 Hyderabad1,923 Jaipur1,230 Cochin980 Chandigarh968 Indore743 Surat689 Visakhapatnam550 Raipur536 Lucknow490 Nagpur484 Rajkot477 Amritsar330 Cuttack319 Karnataka273 Panaji240 Jodhpur228 Agra224 Patna202 Ranchi199 Guwahati172 SC158 Dehradun146 Calcutta142 Jabalpur102 Allahabad92 Kerala83 Punjab & Haryana47 Telangana35 Varanasi33 Orissa24 Rajasthan12 Himachal Pradesh8 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7 Gauhati2 Andhra Pradesh2 Uttarakhand2 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1 RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 J&K1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1 Tripura1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 25054 Addition to Income53 Disallowance47 Section 143(3)43 Deduction43 Section 80P37 Section 14836 Section 13233 Section 80P(2)(a)32 Section 80P(2)(d)

J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED,MADURAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1, MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1846/CHNY/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1, MADURAI vs. J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD., MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 6,446 · Page 1 of 323

...

31

ITA 1883/CHNY/2017[2014-15]Status: Disposed

ITAT Chennai

21 Jan 2022

AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 947/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

ACIT, MADURAI vs. J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED, MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 967/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. JCIT, MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1063/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. JCIT, MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1059/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. JCIT, MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1060/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. JCIT, MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1061/CHNY/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. JCIT, MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1062/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

ACIT, MADURAI vs. J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD., MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1076/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

ACIT, MADURAI vs. J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD., MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1077/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

ACIT, MADURAI vs. J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD., MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1078/CHNY/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

ACIT, MADURAI vs. J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LTD., MADURAI

Appeal stand dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1272/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri M. Murali, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 14ASection 32(2)

disallowance of Rs.2.22 Lacs in the return of income. The sad disallowance was arrived at after considering a portion

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2283/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, IRS, CIT

Section 143(3)Section 148

disallowances. (i) Disallowance on quality allowance 44,54,80,402 (ii) Disallowance out of CSR expenses 3,90,49,461 (iii) Disallowance

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2282/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, IRS, CIT

Section 143(3)Section 148

disallowances. (i) Disallowance on quality allowance 44,54,80,402 (ii) Disallowance out of CSR expenses 3,90,49,461 (iii) Disallowance

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2281/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, IRS, CIT

Section 143(3)Section 148

disallowances. (i) Disallowance on quality allowance 44,54,80,402 (ii) Disallowance out of CSR expenses 3,90,49,461 (iii) Disallowance

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2280/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, IRS, CIT

Section 143(3)Section 148

disallowances. (i) Disallowance on quality allowance 44,54,80,402 (ii) Disallowance out of CSR expenses 3,90,49,461 (iii) Disallowance

PARRY INFRASTRUCTURE CO P LTD. ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(1) , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly-allowed

ITA 1653/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri Philip George, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som, CIT-DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowances under the following heads:- i. Disallowance u/s.14A of the Act amounting to Rs.2,87,984/- ii. Disallowance

VST MOTOR LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, Ground No.4 is raised by the assessee for the AY 2011-12 is

ITA 968/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.968 & 969/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2011-12 M/S.Vst Motor Ltd., V. The Asst. Commissioner- Gove Building, Of Income Tax, No.199 (Old No.144), Corporate Circle-3(2), Anna Salai, Chennai. Chennai-600 002. [Pan: Aabcv 6244 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. &For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT

disallowance can be bifurcated into two categories (i) disallowance out of discount expenditure and, (ii) disallowance out of vehicle

VST AUTO AGENCY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI

In the result, Ground No.4 is raised by the assessee for the AY 2011-12 is

ITA 970/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.968 & 969/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2011-12 M/S.Vst Motor Ltd., V. The Asst. Commissioner- Gove Building, Of Income Tax, No.199 (Old No.144), Corporate Circle-3(2), Anna Salai, Chennai. Chennai-600 002. [Pan: Aabcv 6244 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. &For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT

disallowance can be bifurcated into two categories (i) disallowance out of discount expenditure and, (ii) disallowance out of vehicle