BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

380 results for “depreciation”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,491Delhi959Chennai380Bangalore343Kolkata252Ahmedabad183Jaipur128Hyderabad89Chandigarh86Karnataka55Raipur53Pune50Indore46Cochin31SC24Visakhapatnam24Surat23Lucknow20Rajkot18Kerala11Nagpur11Panaji8Guwahati8Cuttack6Calcutta6Jodhpur5Telangana5Amritsar3Dehradun3Ranchi2Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana2Allahabad1Agra1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Jabalpur1Patna1Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Disallowance65Addition to Income65Section 143(3)50Section 80I48Depreciation43Section 4042Section 8040Deduction40Section 80H36Section 195

PALANISAMY RANI,ERODE vs. PCIT-1, COIMBATORE, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1490/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1490/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Principal Commissioner Of Palanisamy Rani, V. Income Tax, 38, Emm Road-2, Chennimalai Coimbatore. Road, Erode – 638 001. [Pan:Biqpr-2991-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. T. Vasudevan, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. V. Nandakumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.05.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10.07.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. V. Nandakumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54F

depreciable asset and hence the gain on such property sale as Short term capital gain and taxable @ 30%.” 3. The brief

Showing 1–20 of 380 · Page 1 of 19

...
28
Section 528
Section 14716

M/S APEX TRANSWORLD PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CC-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 932/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.932/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2011-12 V. M/S.Apex Transworld Pvt. Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner Of 38, 2Nd Main Road, Income Tax, R.A. Puram, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai-600 028. Chennai. [Pan: Aadca 7034 L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.K. Ramesh Babu, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr. Ar.V.Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr. AR.V.Sreenivasan
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

depreciation has not been claimed, only because the claim has been made during 148 proceedings. 5. Appellate authority erred in considering case laws " Taxman 442(SC) Commissioner of income tax vs sun engineering works (p) ltd " in Supreme court and "Satyamangalam Agriculture Cooperative Marketing Society Ltd vs Income tax officer" in Madras High Court is against facts of the present

ACIT, LTU-2,, CHENNAI vs. ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2618/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

Depreciable assets 1,03,68,211 b) Other assets: Land 47,84,126 Prepaid Expenses 14,35,954 Banked Units 1,00,67,969 Unbilled revenue 7,86,53,504 9,49,41,553 C) Less: Liabilities: Provision for expenses 14,24,593 10,38,85,171 B = a + b - c Net worth C). Capital gains on slum sale

ACIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 20(1), CHENNAI vs. PVP CINEMAS P. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1058/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Mar 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1058/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S. Pvp Cinemas P.Ltd. Krm Centre, 9Th Floor, Tax Non-Corporate Circle-20(1) No.2,Harrington Road, Chennai-34. Chetpet , Chennai-600 031. Pan: Aaeca 8733H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Respondent: 25.01.2022
Section 143(3)

short term capital gain by considering additional evidences filed by the assessee, including photocopies of bills submitted by M/s.Bharath Polymers & M/s. Devi Designers & Decorations on the ground that even though, the assessee failed to file original bills due to various reasons, but on verification of photocopies of bills submitted by the assessee with corroborative evidences which proves the fact that

MOSBACHER INDIA LLC,CHENNAI vs. ADDL. DIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 1085/CHNY/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Nov 2016AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 42(2)Section 42(2)(b)

depreciation is admissible under section 32" had been omitted; and] (c) to the depletion of mineral oil in the mining area in respect of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which commercial production is begun and for such succeeding year or years as may be specified in the agreement; and such allowances shall be computed and made

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. INDO INTERNATIONAL LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 58/CHNY/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 May 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.58/Mds/2011 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Indo International Ltd., No.18, 1St Floor, Sunkurama Street, Income Tax, V. Company Circle – Ii(3), Chennai - 600 001. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aaaci 2408 R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Dr. B. Nischal, JCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 2Section 271(1)(c)Section 50Section 56(1)

term capital gain. Since the assessee claimed depreciation on the business premises, the gain arising out of depreciable asset has to be necessarily classified as short

DR.E.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2529/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2529/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dr.E.S.Krishnamoorthy, V. The Income Tax Officer, No.3, South Mada Street, Non-Corporate Ward-I(4), Srinagar Colony, Saidapet, Chennai. Chennai-600 015. [Pan: Alwpk 0134 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Respondent: Mr.AR.V.Sreenivasan
Section 54

depreciation. Accordingly, we reject the ground taken by the assessee. 9. The next issue that came up for our consideration from Ground Nos.6-9 of assessee’s appeal is computation of long term capital gains derived from transfer of property in pursuant to JDA. The fact with regard :: 8 :: to impugned dispute are that the JDA between the assessee

TEXMO INDUUSTRIES,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT-4, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 566/CHNY/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri K. Vignesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 2(11)Section 263Section 50

depreciable asset be assessed as Short Term Capital Gain and not Long Term Capital Gain, this has attained finality and the matter

TEXMO INDUSTRIES,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT-4, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 563/CHNY/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri K. Vignesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 2(11)Section 263Section 50

depreciable asset be assessed as Short Term Capital Gain and not Long Term Capital Gain, this has attained finality and the matter

TEXMO INDUSTRIES,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT,CC-4, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 562/CHNY/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri K. Vignesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 2(11)Section 263Section 50

depreciable asset be assessed as Short Term Capital Gain and not Long Term Capital Gain, this has attained finality and the matter

TEXMO INDUSTRIES,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT,NCC-4, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 564/CHNY/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri K. Vignesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 2(11)Section 263Section 50

depreciable asset be assessed as Short Term Capital Gain and not Long Term Capital Gain, this has attained finality and the matter

TEXMO INDUSTRIES,COMBATORE vs. ACIT-4, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 565/CHNY/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri K. Vignesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 2(11)Section 263Section 50

depreciable asset be assessed as Short Term Capital Gain and not Long Term Capital Gain, this has attained finality and the matter

BHAVANI DISTILLERIS AND CHEMICALS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 814/CHNY/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

Section 40

short-term capital gain’ / ‘income from business’:- ITA No.68/Mds/2012, 1584/Mds/2014 ITA Nos. 1571 & 3055/Mds/2016 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee claims to have entered in to Joint Venture Farming Agreement (JVFA) dated 09.07.2004 with several persons involving 70 acres of land situated at Thaiyur and Thazhampur Village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District. Subsequently M/s. Carmen Builders & Constructions

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. BHAVANI DISTILLERIES AND CHEMICALS LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 68/CHNY/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

Section 40

short-term capital gain’ / ‘income from business’:- ITA No.68/Mds/2012, 1584/Mds/2014 ITA Nos. 1571 & 3055/Mds/2016 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee claims to have entered in to Joint Venture Farming Agreement (JVFA) dated 09.07.2004 with several persons involving 70 acres of land situated at Thaiyur and Thazhampur Village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District. Subsequently M/s. Carmen Builders & Constructions

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. BHAVANI DISTILLERIES AND CHEMICALS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1584/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

Section 40

short-term capital gain’ / ‘income from business’:- ITA No.68/Mds/2012, 1584/Mds/2014 ITA Nos. 1571 & 3055/Mds/2016 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee claims to have entered in to Joint Venture Farming Agreement (JVFA) dated 09.07.2004 with several persons involving 70 acres of land situated at Thaiyur and Thazhampur Village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District. Subsequently M/s. Carmen Builders & Constructions

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. BHAVANI DISTILLERIES & CHEMICALS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 3055/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

Section 40

short-term capital gain’ / ‘income from business’:- ITA No.68/Mds/2012, 1584/Mds/2014 ITA Nos. 1571 & 3055/Mds/2016 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee claims to have entered in to Joint Venture Farming Agreement (JVFA) dated 09.07.2004 with several persons involving 70 acres of land situated at Thaiyur and Thazhampur Village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District. Subsequently M/s. Carmen Builders & Constructions

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. BHAVANI DISTILLERIES AND CHEMICALS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 888/CHNY/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

Section 40

short-term capital gain’ / ‘income from business’:- ITA No.68/Mds/2012, 1584/Mds/2014 ITA Nos. 1571 & 3055/Mds/2016 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee claims to have entered in to Joint Venture Farming Agreement (JVFA) dated 09.07.2004 with several persons involving 70 acres of land situated at Thaiyur and Thazhampur Village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District. Subsequently M/s. Carmen Builders & Constructions

JCIT (OSD), CHENNAI vs. BHAVANI DISTILLERIES & CHEMICALS PVT LTD., CHENNAI

In the result the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 1571/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

Section 40

short-term capital gain’ / ‘income from business’:- ITA No.68/Mds/2012, 1584/Mds/2014 ITA Nos. 1571 & 3055/Mds/2016 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee claims to have entered in to Joint Venture Farming Agreement (JVFA) dated 09.07.2004 with several persons involving 70 acres of land situated at Thaiyur and Thazhampur Village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District. Subsequently M/s. Carmen Builders & Constructions

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 1431/CHNY/2014[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Apr 2016AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Milind S. Kothari, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Madhukar Bhusari, CIT
Section 139Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Short Term Capital Gains claimed by the assessee to the tune of "65,77,380/- 5.3 We have considered the facts and submissions made of ld. Authorised Representative and Departmental Representative were similar issue was adjudicated by us for the assessment year 2006-07 in ITA No.1181/Mds/2014 at para 4.19 and we allow the ground of the assessee

CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 1180/CHNY/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Apr 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Milind S. Kothari, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Madhukar Bhusari, CIT
Section 139Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Short Term Capital Gains claimed by the assessee to the tune of "65,77,380/- 5.3 We have considered the facts and submissions made of ld. Authorised Representative and Departmental Representative were similar issue was adjudicated by us for the assessment year 2006-07 in ITA No.1181/Mds/2014 at para 4.19 and we allow the ground of the assessee