BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

551 results for “depreciation”+ Section 44clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,100Delhi1,816Bangalore762Chennai551Ahmedabad479Kolkata307Hyderabad205Jaipur162Raipur138Chandigarh133Pune88Indore76Cochin68Karnataka65Amritsar59Cuttack53Surat52Visakhapatnam46Lucknow43SC32Ranchi30Nagpur30Rajkot30Guwahati24Jodhpur21Dehradun15Telangana14Patna14Agra13Kerala12Allahabad10Panaji6Varanasi5Jabalpur3Calcutta2Rajasthan1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Punjab & Haryana1Orissa1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)83Section 4065Disallowance64Addition to Income57Section 14742Deduction42Section 80H40Section 19530Section 8030Depreciation

MOSBACHER INDIA LLC,CHENNAI vs. ADDL. DIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 1085/CHNY/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Nov 2016AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 42(2)Section 42(2)(b)

depreciation is admissible under section 32" had been omitted; and] (c) to the depletion of mineral oil in the mining area in respect of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which commercial production is begun and for such succeeding year or years as may be specified in the agreement; and such allowances shall be computed and made

ACIT, ERODE vs. SKM EGG PRODUCTS EXPORT (INDIA) LIMITED, ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 387/CHNY/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai

Showing 1–20 of 551 · Page 1 of 28

...
30
Section 528
Section 14A23
12 Nov 2018
AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Mr.G.Baskar, Adv
Section 10ASection 10BSection 150Section 28Section 32(1)Section 32(2)Section 72

section 28 to 44. Also brought forward depreciation is dealt with by section 32(2) and brought forward loss by section

ACIT, ERODE vs. SKM EGG PRODUCTS EXPORT (INDIA) LIMITED, ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 385/CHNY/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Nov 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Mr.G.Baskar, Adv
Section 10ASection 10BSection 150Section 28Section 32(1)Section 32(2)Section 72

section 28 to 44. Also brought forward depreciation is dealt with by section 32(2) and brought forward loss by section

ACIT, ERODE vs. SKM EGG PRODUCTS EXPORT (INDIA) LIMITED, ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 386/CHNY/2018[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Nov 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Mr.G.Baskar, Adv
Section 10ASection 10BSection 150Section 28Section 32(1)Section 32(2)Section 72

section 28 to 44. Also brought forward depreciation is dealt with by section 32(2) and brought forward loss by section

ACIT, ERODE vs. SKM EGG PRODUCTS EXPORT (INDIA) LIMITED, ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 384/CHNY/2018[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Nov 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Mr.G.Baskar, Adv
Section 10ASection 10BSection 150Section 28Section 32(1)Section 32(2)Section 72

section 28 to 44. Also brought forward depreciation is dealt with by section 32(2) and brought forward loss by section

ACIT, ERODE vs. SKM EGG PRODUCTS EXPORT (INDIA) LIMITED, ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 383/CHNY/2018[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Nov 2018AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Mr.G.Baskar, Adv
Section 10ASection 10BSection 150Section 28Section 32(1)Section 32(2)Section 72

section 28 to 44. Also brought forward depreciation is dealt with by section 32(2) and brought forward loss by section

M/S. BAY FORGE PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CO, CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2329/CHNY/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Dec 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Shiva Srinivas, C.I.T
Section 115Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147

Section 115JB of the Act as under: Year Depreciation Business Business Adjustment Remarks cumulative Ending Loss Loss without business loss Depreciation as per books 31.03.1997 (2,848,288) (1,78,66,281) (15,017,993) (1,78,66,281) (2,848,288) (1,78,66,281) (15,017,993) 31.03.1998 (14,872,413) (28,351,317) 5,912,166 Prior

M/S. V.V.VANNIAPERUMAL & SONS,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. PCIT-2, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 1765/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri P. G. Sekar, C.A ""For Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar,CIT
Section 143(3)

section 32 of the Act and thus, we direct the AO to allow depreciation on brand value from the year in which the assessee is entitled for such depreciation. 12. The next two common issues in all these 7 appeals of assessee are as regards to addition of construction expenses in regard to Anbu Illam Thulir School and RJ Mantra

M/S. V.V.V. & SONS EDIBLE OILS LTD.,,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2277/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri P. G. Sekar, C.A ""For Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar,CIT
Section 143(3)

section 32 of the Act and thus, we direct the AO to allow depreciation on brand value from the year in which the assessee is entitled for such depreciation. 12. The next two common issues in all these 7 appeals of assessee are as regards to addition of construction expenses in regard to Anbu Illam Thulir School and RJ Mantra

M/S. V.V.V. & SONS EDIBLE OILS LTD.,,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2275/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri P. G. Sekar, C.A ""For Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar,CIT
Section 143(3)

section 32 of the Act and thus, we direct the AO to allow depreciation on brand value from the year in which the assessee is entitled for such depreciation. 12. The next two common issues in all these 7 appeals of assessee are as regards to addition of construction expenses in regard to Anbu Illam Thulir School and RJ Mantra

M/S. V.V.V. & SONS EDIBLE OILS LTD.,,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2280/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri P. G. Sekar, C.A ""For Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar,CIT
Section 143(3)

section 32 of the Act and thus, we direct the AO to allow depreciation on brand value from the year in which the assessee is entitled for such depreciation. 12. The next two common issues in all these 7 appeals of assessee are as regards to addition of construction expenses in regard to Anbu Illam Thulir School and RJ Mantra

M/S. V.V.V. & SONS EDIBLE OILS LTD.,,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2278/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri P. G. Sekar, C.A ""For Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar,CIT
Section 143(3)

section 32 of the Act and thus, we direct the AO to allow depreciation on brand value from the year in which the assessee is entitled for such depreciation. 12. The next two common issues in all these 7 appeals of assessee are as regards to addition of construction expenses in regard to Anbu Illam Thulir School and RJ Mantra

M/S. V.V.V. & SONS EDIBLE OILS LTD.,,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2281/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri P. G. Sekar, C.A ""For Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar,CIT
Section 143(3)

section 32 of the Act and thus, we direct the AO to allow depreciation on brand value from the year in which the assessee is entitled for such depreciation. 12. The next two common issues in all these 7 appeals of assessee are as regards to addition of construction expenses in regard to Anbu Illam Thulir School and RJ Mantra

M/S. V.V.V. & SONS EDIBLE OILS LTD.,,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2279/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri P. G. Sekar, C.A ""For Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar,CIT
Section 143(3)

section 32 of the Act and thus, we direct the AO to allow depreciation on brand value from the year in which the assessee is entitled for such depreciation. 12. The next two common issues in all these 7 appeals of assessee are as regards to addition of construction expenses in regard to Anbu Illam Thulir School and RJ Mantra

M/S. V.V.V. & SONS EDIBLE OILS LTD.,,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2276/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Shri P. G. Sekar, C.A ""For Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar,CIT
Section 143(3)

section 32 of the Act and thus, we direct the AO to allow depreciation on brand value from the year in which the assessee is entitled for such depreciation. 12. The next two common issues in all these 7 appeals of assessee are as regards to addition of construction expenses in regard to Anbu Illam Thulir School and RJ Mantra

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER , CHENNAI vs. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, Revenue Appeal for AY 2012-13 stands dismissed

ITA 1339/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. Sandeep BagmarFor Respondent: Mr. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 115JSection 14ASection 2Section 37(1)

44. Mr. Swaminathan, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue submitted that additional higher depreciation is applicable to new motor vehicles acquired and put to use in the business of run them on hire, but such higher depreciation cannot be given to the assessee, who is buying motor vehicles for his own business. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed depreciation

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NUNGAMBAKKAM CHENNAI vs. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, Revenue Appeal for AY 2012-13 stands dismissed

ITA 1438/CHNY/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. Sandeep BagmarFor Respondent: Mr. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 115JSection 14ASection 2Section 37(1)

44. Mr. Swaminathan, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue submitted that additional higher depreciation is applicable to new motor vehicles acquired and put to use in the business of run them on hire, but such higher depreciation cannot be given to the assessee, who is buying motor vehicles for his own business. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed depreciation

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CHENNAI vs. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, Revenue Appeal for AY 2012-13 stands dismissed

ITA 1462/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. Sandeep BagmarFor Respondent: Mr. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 115JSection 14ASection 2Section 37(1)

44. Mr. Swaminathan, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue submitted that additional higher depreciation is applicable to new motor vehicles acquired and put to use in the business of run them on hire, but such higher depreciation cannot be given to the assessee, who is buying motor vehicles for his own business. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed depreciation

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NON CORP WARD 8, CHENNAI

In the result, Revenue Appeal for AY 2012-13 stands dismissed

ITA 1285/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. Sandeep BagmarFor Respondent: Mr. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 115JSection 14ASection 2Section 37(1)

44. Mr. Swaminathan, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue submitted that additional higher depreciation is applicable to new motor vehicles acquired and put to use in the business of run them on hire, but such higher depreciation cannot be given to the assessee, who is buying motor vehicles for his own business. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed depreciation

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NON CORP CIRCLE 8, CHENNAI

In the result, Revenue Appeal for AY 2012-13 stands dismissed

ITA 1284/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. Sandeep BagmarFor Respondent: Mr. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 115JSection 14ASection 2Section 37(1)

44. Mr. Swaminathan, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue submitted that additional higher depreciation is applicable to new motor vehicles acquired and put to use in the business of run them on hire, but such higher depreciation cannot be given to the assessee, who is buying motor vehicles for his own business. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed depreciation