BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “depreciation”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka64Mumbai43Ahmedabad33Delhi23Kolkata9Chennai9Hyderabad6Bangalore4Patna3Jabalpur2Jaipur2SC2Pune2Telangana1Cochin1Guwahati1Jodhpur1Rajkot1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 1117Section 44A9Section 327Depreciation7Section 12A6Charitable Trust6Section 11(1)(a)4Exemption4Deduction3Disallowance

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. VALLIAMMAI SOCIETY, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas cross objection of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 440/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Apr 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 440/Chny/2017 & C.O. No.48/Chny/2017 (In Ita No.440/Chny/2017) "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2012-2013

For Appellant: Shri. B. S. Purushottam, C.AFor Respondent: Mrs. Ruby George, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 133(6)

43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of :- 13 -: & CO 48/2017 building, plant and machinery

BANNARIAMMAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, COIMBATORE

3
Section 282

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 3342/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Apr 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3342/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2012-2013. M/S. Bannariamman Educational Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Trust, Income Tax, No.1212, Trichy Road, Exemptions, Coimbatore 641 018. Coimbatore. [Pan Aaatb 1235C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. Saroj Kumar Parida, Adv
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 28Section 32

43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee

DCIT EXEMPTIONS, COIMBATORE vs. SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES, ERODE

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2989/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.2989/ Chny/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs M/S. Saveetha Institute Of Medical The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Technical Sciences, Exemptions, No.333, Saveetha Hospital Coimbatore. Building, Brough Road, Erode – 638 001. Pan: Aafts0845L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.05.2018
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 28Section 29Section 30Section 32

43C. That, section 32(1) provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee and used

DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), , CHENNAI vs. SRI VEKKALIAMMAN EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2722/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2722/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2011-2012. Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Sri Vekkaliamman Educational Income Tax, Vs. & Charitable Trust, (Exemptions) No.10, East Mada Church Street, Chennai Circle, Royapuram, Chennai 600 034. Chennai 600 013. [Pan Aafts 7863Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri. G. Seetharaman, C.A
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 32

43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee

RURAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FOR LIBERATION,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO WARD 1, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1243/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1246/Chny/2019. "नधा$रण वष$ /Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri D.Anand,AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Ragavendra Rao
Section 11Section 32

43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee

RURAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FOR LIBERATION,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO WARD 1, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1244/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1246/Chny/2019. "नधा$रण वष$ /Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri D.Anand,AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Ragavendra Rao
Section 11Section 32

43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee

ESSK EDUCATIONAL CHARITIES,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO WARD 1, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1246/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1246/Chny/2019. "नधा$रण वष$ /Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri D.Anand,AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Ragavendra Rao
Section 11Section 32

43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee

S.ARJUN,CHENNAI vs. ACIT NON CORPORATE WARD 20(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2220/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. Saroj Kumar Parida, Advocate
Section 36(2)

depreciation and allowances are dealt with in section 32. Therefore, Parliament has used the expression " any expenditure" in section 37 to cover both. Therefore, the expression " expenditure" as used in section 37 ITA No.2220/CHNY /2018 :- 7 -: may, in the circumstances of a particular case, cover an amount which is really a " loss" even though the said amount has not gone

A.MUJAHIDUR RAHMAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1188/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Aug 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George]

For Appellant: Shri. S. Anandh, C.A
Section 44A

depreciation of "15,830/-. However, assessee stated that the business was closed down and the bills and book misplaced. Further, as per assessee books were lost in the floods which came to Chennai in December, 2015. Ld. Assessing Officer however verified the bank statement of the assessee and came to a conclusion that expenses claimed were not met by bank