BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “depreciation”+ Section 270Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi146Mumbai102Chandigarh54Ahmedabad42Bangalore21Hyderabad19Pune15Jaipur14Kolkata13Chennai13Guwahati9Raipur6Surat5Lucknow5Indore4Dehradun4Nagpur4Visakhapatnam2Rajkot2Jodhpur2Cuttack1Cochin1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)12Section 2509Addition to Income9Section 143(3)8Penalty8Section 143(2)7Section 139(1)7Section 1326Section 153A6Search & Seizure

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. ETHIRAJULU VAJRAVEL KUMARAN, TIRUVANNAMALAI,

ITA 1655/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2025AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

270A / 271AA\nof the Act. The relevant Assessment Years are 2015-16, 2017-18,\nto 2021-22. The details of the respective appeals preferred by the\nRevenue are as under: -\nS.\nNo.\nITA No.\nAY\nDate\norder\nCIT(A)\nof Date\nof Penalty\nof order of AO levied by\nthe AO\nu/s.\nAmount of\npenalty\nlevied (Rs.)\n1\n1650/Chny/2025\n2015

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. ETHIRAJULU VAJRAVEL KUMARAN, CHENNAI

6
Survey u/s 133A6
Section 270A5

In the result, all the six appeals of the Revenue are\ndismissed

ITA 1650/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2025AY 2015-16
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

270A / 271AA\nof the Act. The relevant Assessment Years are 2015-16, 2017-18,\nto 2021-22. The details of the respective appeals preferred by the\nRevenue are as under: -\nS.\nNo.\nITA No.\nAY\nDate\nof\norder\nCIT(A)\nof Date\nof Penalty\nof order of AO levied by\nthe AO\nu/s.\nAmount of\npenalty\nlevied (Rs.)\n1\n1650/Chny/2025

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. ETHIRAJULU VAJRAVEL KUMARAN, TIRUVANNAMALAI

In the result, all the six appeals of the Revenue are\ndismissed

ITA 1651/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

270A / 271AA\nof the Act. The relevant Assessment Years are 2015-16, 2017-18,\nto 2021-22. The details of the respective appeals preferred by the\nRevenue are as under: -\nS.\nNo.\nITA No.\nAY\nDate\norder\nCIT(A)\nof Date\nof Penalty\nof order of AO levied by\nthe AO\nu/s.\nAmount of\npenalty\nlevied (Rs.)\n1\n1650/Chny/2025\n2015

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. ETHIRAJULU VAJRAVEL KUMARAN, TIRUVANNAMALAI

ITA 1652/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Shiva Srinivas, CITFor Respondent: Shri R. Venkata Raman, CA
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

270A / 271AA\nof the Act. The relevant Assessment Years are 2015-16, 2017-18,\nto 2021-22. The details of the respective appeals preferred by the\nRevenue are as under: -\nS.\nNo.\nITA No.\nAY\nDate\norder\nCIT(A)\nof\nDate\nof\norder of AO\nPenalty\nlevied by\nthe AO\nu/s.\nAmount of\npenalty\nlevied (Rs.)\n1\n1650/Chny/2025\n2015

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. ETHIRAJULU VAJRAVEL KUMARAN, THIRUVANNAMALAI

ITA 1653/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2025AY 2019-20
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

270A / 271AA\nof the Act. The relevant Assessment Years are 2015-16, 2017-18,\nto 2021-22. The details of the respective appeals preferred by the\nRevenue are as under: -\nS.\nNo.\nITA No.\nAY\nDate\nof\norder\nCIT(A)\nof\nDate\nof\norder of AO\nPenalty\nlevied by\nthe AO\nu/s.\nAmount of\npenalty\nlevied (Rs.)\n1\n1650/Chny/2025\n2015

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. ETHIRAJULU VAJRAVEL KUMARAN, THIRUVANNAMALAI

In the result, all the six appeals of the Revenue are\ndismissed

ITA 1654/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2025AY 2020-21
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

270A / 271AA\nof the Act. The relevant Assessment Years are 2015-16, 2017-18,\nto 2021-22. The details of the respective appeals preferred by the\nRevenue are as under: -\nS.\nNo.\nITA No.\nAY\nDate\norder\nCIT(A)\nof\nDate\nof\norder of AO\nPenalty\nlevied by\nthe AO\nu/s.\nAmount of\npenalty\nlevied (Rs.)\n1\n1650/Chny/2025\n2015

M/S. AVM PRODUCTIONS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-20(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2359/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Ms. Padmavathy. S

Section 270Section 270A

depreciation which is an earlier issue and this cannot be concluded as misreporting or under reporting and no limb of section 270A

SRI BALAGOPALAN JEWELLERYMART ,SOUTH AVANI MOOLA STREET, MADURAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIR 3(3) CHENNAI, INVESTIGATION BUILDING, CHENNAI

In the result, the captioned appeal is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 3946/CHNY/2025[2020-2021]Status: FixedITAT Chennai03 Feb 2026AY 2020-2021
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 270A

270A was initiated.\nSA No. 141/Chny/2025 (Α.Υ.2018-19)\nITA No:3964/Chny/2025\n:: 3 ::\n3. The Id.CIT(A) in his order has noted that:\nThe appellant-firm has not produced any evidence to show\nthat it controlled, supervised, or financed the cultivation.\nThere is no agreement, correspondence, or accounts showing\npayments made to Ponniamman Farm for carrying out\nagricultural

GATEWAY OFFICE PARKS PRIOVATE LIMITEDI,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CICLE-6(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 617/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Feb 2025AY 2015-16
Section 250Section 56(2)(viib)

270A for the said previous year.\nExplanation.—For the purposes of this clause, —\n(a) the fair market value of the shares shall be the value-\n(i) as may be determined in accordance with such method as may be prescribed; or\n(ii) as may be substantiated by the company to the satisfaction of the Assessing\nOfficer, based

RAJ TELEISION NETWORK LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORPORAE CIRCLE-20, CHENNAI

In the result both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 530/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S.R.Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 530 & 531/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2018-19 Acit, Raj Television Network V. Non Corporate Circle 20, Limited, Chennai – 34. No. 32, Poes Road 2Nd Street, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. [Pan: Aaacr-3580-P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri.K. Balasubramanian, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri.T.M. Suganthamala, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 31.07.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri.K. Balasubramanian, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri.T.M. Suganthamala, Addl. CIT
Section 263

section 263 rightly passed a revisional order setting aside said assessment - Held, yes [In favour of revenue]. Further, it is not demonstrated by the appellant whether the said expenses were recognized or claimed in Asstt. Year 2013-14 or not. Hence, the order of the AO cannot be interfered with, and accordingly, the ground of appeal No. 2 is dismissed

RAJTELEVISION NETWORK LIMITED,CHNNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORPORAE CIRCLE-20, CHENNAI

In the result both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 531/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S.R.Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 530 & 531/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2018-19 Acit, Raj Television Network V. Non Corporate Circle 20, Limited, Chennai – 34. No. 32, Poes Road 2Nd Street, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. [Pan: Aaacr-3580-P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri.K. Balasubramanian, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri.T.M. Suganthamala, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 31.07.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri.K. Balasubramanian, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri.T.M. Suganthamala, Addl. CIT
Section 263

section 263 rightly passed a revisional order setting aside said assessment - Held, yes [In favour of revenue]. Further, it is not demonstrated by the appellant whether the said expenses were recognized or claimed in Asstt. Year 2013-14 or not. Hence, the order of the AO cannot be interfered with, and accordingly, the ground of appeal No. 2 is dismissed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CORPORATE CIRCLE 1 1, CHENNAI vs. HITACHI SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , KANCHIPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeal filed\nby the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1715/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND\nSHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nआयकर अपीलसं./IT(TP)A No.: 17/CHNY/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19\nHitachi Solutions India Private\nLimited,\nBlock 5, 10th Floor, 1/124,\nDLF IT Park, Shivaji Gardens,\nMount Poonamallee Road,\nChennai - 600 089.\nThe Deputy Commissioner of\nIncome Tax,\nVs. Corporate Circle- 1(1),\nNo.121, M.G.Road,\nChennai - 600 034.\n[PAN:AAACZ-1544-R]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)\nआयकर

For Appellant: Shri Darpan Kirpalani, Advocate by VirtualFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, C.I.T
Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153(4)

depreciation, amortization and other non-cash\nexpenses of the Appellant vis-a-vis the comparable companies.\n3. 11. The Ld. CIT(A) I Ld. TPO I Ld. AO have erred, in law and on facts and\ncircumstances of the case, by not making suitable adjustments to account for\ndifferences in the risk profile of the Appellant

SRI KRISHA TRADERS,SIVAGANGAI vs. DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2223/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2223/Chny/2025 िनधा%रण वष% /Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Mr. N. Vijay Kumar, C.A *+For Respondent: Ms. Babitha, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 40A(3)

270A are initiated for under reporting of Income which was in consequence of mis-reporting of income.” 3. On further appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the addition made by the A.O. It is relevant to note here that the assessee has raised the legal contentions with regard to addition made by the A.O before the CIT(A) and that