BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “depreciation”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai189Delhi44Chandigarh44Ahmedabad27Bangalore21Kolkata20Hyderabad18Chennai9Surat5Jaipur3Karnataka2Kerala1Indore1Cochin1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 80H36Section 8030Section 271A12Section 143(2)12Section 1476Deduction6Penalty6Addition to Income6Section 143(1)3Reassessment

ACIT, MADURAI vs. ARUNA ALLOY STEELS PRIVATE LTD., MADURAI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal for assessment year

ITA 933/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Apr 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3, 933 & 847/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S Aruna Alloy Steels (P) Ltd., Income Tax, V. Super B-3, Industrial Estate, Corporate Circle I, K-Pudur, Madurai – 625 007. Madurai. Pan : Aaeca 6781 D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Pathlavath Peerya, CITFor Respondent: Shri K. Ravi, Advocate
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147

depreciation allowance or any other allowance under this Act has been computed. (d) where a person is found to have any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India. Explanation 3.— For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under this section, the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped

3
Reopening of Assessment3

ACIT, MADURAI vs. ARUNA ALLOY STEELS PRIVATE LTD., MADURAI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal for assessment year

ITA 847/CHNY/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Apr 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3, 933 & 847/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S Aruna Alloy Steels (P) Ltd., Income Tax, V. Super B-3, Industrial Estate, Corporate Circle I, K-Pudur, Madurai – 625 007. Madurai. Pan : Aaeca 6781 D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Pathlavath Peerya, CITFor Respondent: Shri K. Ravi, Advocate
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147

depreciation allowance or any other allowance under this Act has been computed. (d) where a person is found to have any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India. Explanation 3.— For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under this section, the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped

ACIT, MADURAI vs. ARUNA ALLOY STEELS (P) LTD., MADURAI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal for assessment year

ITA 3/CHNY/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Apr 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3, 933 & 847/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S Aruna Alloy Steels (P) Ltd., Income Tax, V. Super B-3, Industrial Estate, Corporate Circle I, K-Pudur, Madurai – 625 007. Madurai. Pan : Aaeca 6781 D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Pathlavath Peerya, CITFor Respondent: Shri K. Ravi, Advocate
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147

depreciation allowance or any other allowance under this Act has been computed. (d) where a person is found to have any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India. Explanation 3.— For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under this section, the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD., TUTICORIN

ITA 1020/CHNY/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M. Swaminathan, Sr.Standing
Section 271ASection 80Section 80H

145A of the Act. This Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 19. The next ground of appeal is with regard to addition of `14,58,83,105/- consequent to the block assessment in the assessee’s case. 20. Shri M. Swaminathan

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 318/CHNY/2008[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M. Swaminathan, Sr.Standing
Section 271ASection 80Section 80H

145A of the Act. This Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 19. The next ground of appeal is with regard to addition of `14,58,83,105/- consequent to the block assessment in the assessee’s case. 20. Shri M. Swaminathan

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD., TUTICORIN

ITA 1665/CHNY/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M. Swaminathan, Sr.Standing
Section 271ASection 80Section 80H

145A of the Act. This Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 19. The next ground of appeal is with regard to addition of `14,58,83,105/- consequent to the block assessment in the assessee’s case. 20. Shri M. Swaminathan

M/S. STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD.,MADURAI vs. ADDITIONAL CIT, CHENNAI

ITA 1386/CHNY/2010[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M. Swaminathan, Sr.Standing
Section 271ASection 80Section 80H

145A of the Act. This Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 19. The next ground of appeal is with regard to addition of `14,58,83,105/- consequent to the block assessment in the assessee’s case. 20. Shri M. Swaminathan

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD., TUTICORIN

ITA 319/CHNY/2008[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M. Swaminathan, Sr.Standing
Section 271ASection 80Section 80H

145A of the Act. This Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 19. The next ground of appeal is with regard to addition of `14,58,83,105/- consequent to the block assessment in the assessee’s case. 20. Shri M. Swaminathan

M/S STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD.,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

ITA 86/CHNY/2008[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.318 & 319/Mds/2008 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1020/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1665/Mds/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M. Swaminathan, Sr.Standing
Section 271ASection 80Section 80H

145A of the Act. This Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. ITA No.1020,1665 & 1386/Mds/10 19. The next ground of appeal is with regard to addition of `14,58,83,105/- consequent to the block assessment in the assessee’s case. 20. Shri M. Swaminathan