DCIT, MADURAI vs. PANDYAN HOTELS LIMITED, MADURAI
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed
ITA 1020/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Oct 2017AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1020/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Arun Kurian Joseph, AdvocateFor Respondent: 02.08.2017
Section 142ASection 143(3)
142A of the Act, who valued it at ". 151.21 lacs (vide valuation report (VR) dated 26.06.2014/copy on record), i.e., at a minor difference of ".7.84 lacs. Adopting the same, the AO, regarding the entire expenditure as capital, allowed depreciation thereon at the rate exigible to a building. The ld. CIT(A), in view of it being nominal – less than