POOJA PRABHAKAR,CHENNAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD 15(1), CHENNAI , CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee for the A

delay, was neither deliberate nor intentional but\noccurred due to bona fide reasons, and thus deserved to be condoned in the\ninterest of substantial justice.\n2. Without prejudice to the above, that the Ld.CIT(A) erred in not appreciating\nthat the assessment order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the National\nFaceless Assessment Centre [“Assessing Officer”] u/s.147 r.w.s 144 of the\nAct

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. JAGATHRAKSHAKAN SRINISHA, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in I

condone the delay and the\nappeal is admitted for adjudication on merits.\nAppeal in respect of the assessment order dated 01.03.2019 in ITA\nNo.:1271/Chny/2025:\n3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:\nThe assessee is an individual and is the daughter of Shri. S.Jagathrakshakan.\nA search was conducted u/s.132 of the Act, in the premises of Shri.Jagathrakshakan

POOJA PRABHAKAR,CHENNAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD 15(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee for the A

delay, was neither deliberate nor intentional but\noccurred due to bona fide reasons, and thus deserved to be condoned in the\ninterest of substantial justice.\n2. Without prejudice to the above, that the Ld.CIT(A) erred in not appreciating\nthat the assessment order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the National\nFaceless Assessment Centre [“Assessing Officer”] u/s.147 r.w.s 144 of the\nAct

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. JAGATHRAKSKAN SRINISHA, CHENNAI

condone the delay and the\nappeal is admitted for adjudication on merits.\nAppeal in respect of the assessment order dated 01.03.2019 in ITA\nNo.:1271/Chny/2025:\n3.\nThe brief facts of the case are as follows:\nThe assessee is an individual and is the daughter of Shri. S.Jagathrakshakan.\nA search was conducted u/s.132 of the Act, in the premises of Shri.Jagathrakshakan

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. JAGATHRAKSHAKAN SRINISHA, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in I

condone the delay and the\nappeal is admitted for adjudication on merits.\nAppeal in respect of the assessment order dated 01.03.2019 in ITA\nNo.:1271/Chny/2025:\n3.\nThe brief facts of the case are as follows:\nThe assessee is an individual and is the daughter of Shri. S.Jagathrakshakan.\nA search was conducted u/s.132 of the Act, in the premises of Shri.Jagathrakshakan

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that these assessments are unabated and assumption of jurisdiction by the AO u/s.153A / 153C of the Act is without jurisdiction, as no search material was found or seized during the course of search. S.NO