H.NARAYANLAL,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

condone the delay due to laches on the part of the applicant the court shall compensate the opposite party for his loss. In this case explanation for the delay set

H.NARAYANLAL,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

condone the delay due to laches on the part of the applicant the court shall compensate the opposite party for his loss. In this case explanation for the delay set

H.NARAYANLAL,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

condone the delay due to laches on the part of the applicant the court shall compensate the opposite party for his loss. In this case explanation for the delay set

H.NARAYANLAL,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

condone the delay due to laches on the part of the applicant the court shall compensate the opposite party for his loss. In this case explanation for the delay set

H.NARAYANLAL,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

condone the delay due to laches on the part of the applicant the court shall compensate the opposite party for his loss. In this case explanation for the delay set

HEENA G JAIN,CHENNAI vs. ACIT/DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon’Ble S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.2058/Chny/2025 िनधा7रण वष7 /Assessment Year: 2016-17

set aside an exparte decree on the ground that the Heena G. Jain :- 6 -: explanation offered for condonation of delay is found to be not satisfied. 30. In Postmaster General and others v. Living Media India Limited, (2012) 3 SCC 563, this Court, while dismissing the application for condonation of delay of 427 days in filing the Special Leave Petition

HITECH FLYASH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,TUTICORIN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TIRUNELVELI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.3105/Chny/2025 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 V. Hitech Fly Ash India Pvt Ltd., Acit, 2/101-5, Thiruchendur Road, Income Tax Office Muthiahpuram Tuticorn, Tirunelveli, Nellai City Centre Tuticorin-628005, Tiruchendup. Road Tamil Nadu Rahmath Nagar, Tirunelveli-627011 [Pan: Aabch 7093 J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (" यथ"/Respondent)

set aside an exparte decree on the ground that the explanation offered for condonation of delay is found to be not satisfied. 30. In Postmaster General and others v. Living Media India Limited, (2012) 3 SCC 563, this Court, while dismissing the application for condonation of delay of 427 days in filing the Special Leave Petition, held that condonation

S.S. RANGASAMY RAJA,RAJAPALAYAM vs. ITO, TDS WARD,, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon’Ble Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1743 & 1744/Chny/2025 िनधा>रण वष> /Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

set aside an exparte decree on the ground that the explanation offered for condonation of delay is found to be not satisfied. 30. In Postmaster General and others v. Living Media India Limited, (2012) 3 SCC 563, this Court, while dismissing the application for condonation of delay of 427 days in filing the Special Leave Petition, held that condonation

S. S. RANGASAMY RAJA,RAJAPALAYAM vs. ITO, TDS WARD,, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon’Ble Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1743 & 1744/Chny/2025 िनधा>रण वष> /Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

set aside an exparte decree on the ground that the explanation offered for condonation of delay is found to be not satisfied. 30. In Postmaster General and others v. Living Media India Limited, (2012) 3 SCC 563, this Court, while dismissing the application for condonation of delay of 427 days in filing the Special Leave Petition, held that condonation

M/S. INSCRIBE GRAPHICS LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 107, 108 & 109/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S. Inscribe Graphics Ltd., The Assistant Commissioner Of 174, Developed Plots, Industrial Estate, Vs. Income Tax, Perungudi, Chennai 600 096. Centralized Processing Cell, Tds, [Pan:Aacci0211Q] Ghaziabad. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri I. Dinesh, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Chandrababu, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 11.01.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.02.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 6, Chennai, Dated 19.11.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16. The Effective Common Grounds Raised In All The Appeals Are That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Condoning The Delay In Filing The Appeals Dismissed The Appeal Without Concluding The Appellate Order On Merits.

loss.” 6. In the instant case, the assessee was not aware in time the levy of late filing fee passed under section 234E of the Act since the intimation was communicated by e-mail, which were unnoticed by the employees and only after receipt of notice dated 09.10.2018 for all the above assessment years, the receipt of intimation was brought

M/S. INSCRIBE GRAPHICS LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT (OSD), CORPORATE RANGE-2,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 107, 108 & 109/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S. Inscribe Graphics Ltd., The Assistant Commissioner Of 174, Developed Plots, Industrial Estate, Vs. Income Tax, Perungudi, Chennai 600 096. Centralized Processing Cell, Tds, [Pan:Aacci0211Q] Ghaziabad. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri I. Dinesh, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Chandrababu, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 11.01.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.02.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 6, Chennai, Dated 19.11.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16. The Effective Common Grounds Raised In All The Appeals Are That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Condoning The Delay In Filing The Appeals Dismissed The Appeal Without Concluding The Appellate Order On Merits.

loss.” 6. In the instant case, the assessee was not aware in time the levy of late filing fee passed under section 234E of the Act since the intimation was communicated by e-mail, which were unnoticed by the employees and only after receipt of notice dated 09.10.2018 for all the above assessment years, the receipt of intimation was brought

M/S. INSCRIBE GRAPHICS LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 107, 108 & 109/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S. Inscribe Graphics Ltd., The Assistant Commissioner Of 174, Developed Plots, Industrial Estate, Vs. Income Tax, Perungudi, Chennai 600 096. Centralized Processing Cell, Tds, [Pan:Aacci0211Q] Ghaziabad. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri I. Dinesh, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Chandrababu, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 11.01.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.02.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Common Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 6, Chennai, Dated 19.11.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16. The Effective Common Grounds Raised In All The Appeals Are That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Condoning The Delay In Filing The Appeals Dismissed The Appeal Without Concluding The Appellate Order On Merits.

loss.” 6. In the instant case, the assessee was not aware in time the levy of late filing fee passed under section 234E of the Act since the intimation was communicated by e-mail, which were unnoticed by the employees and only after receipt of notice dated 09.10.2018 for all the above assessment years, the receipt of intimation was brought

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPN. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.2323/Chny/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs M/S.Tamil Nadu Generation & Corporate Circle-3(1) Distribution Corporation Ltd. Chennai-600 034. 800, Npkrr Maligai, Electricity Avenue, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. Pan: Aacct 1245M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

condoning the delay giving due regard to the facts and circumstances of the case . since the delay in removing defect is not deliberate or due to negligence on the part of the assessee but due to various formalities to be complied with and as the assessee is a State Govt. undertaking and lots of administration hurdles are to be cleared

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. ABAN OFFSHORE LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

condoning the delay, however, not discussed the issues on merits. The assessee has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal on merits. The sole issue that came up for our consideration from this appeal is additions towards forex loss. Initially, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 13.09.2019 set

M/S. ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCITCORPORATE CIRCLE1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

condoning the delay, however, not discussed the issues on merits. The assessee has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal on merits. The sole issue that came up for our consideration from this appeal is additions towards forex loss. Initially, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 13.09.2019 set

M/S ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CORPORATE CIRCLE, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

condoning the delay, however, not discussed the issues on merits. The assessee has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal on merits. The sole issue that came up for our consideration from this appeal is additions towards forex loss. Initially, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 13.09.2019 set

ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

condoning the delay, however, not discussed the issues on merits. The assessee has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal on merits. The sole issue that came up for our consideration from this appeal is additions towards forex loss. Initially, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 13.09.2019 set

M/S. TRIVITRON HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. PCIT, , CHENNAI-3

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly

condone delay in filing of appeal and admit appeal filed by the assessee for adjudication. 3. The only issue in the appeal of assessee is as against the revision order passed by the PCIT u/s.263 of the Act that he failed to satisfy the twin conditions i.e., for order passes by the AO u/s.143(3) of the Act, is erroneous