BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

174 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80P(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune225Mumbai215Chennai174Bangalore145Cochin133Panaji92Kolkata48Ahmedabad44Hyderabad32Raipur30Delhi29Jaipur28Nagpur28Visakhapatnam22Chandigarh20Lucknow18Indore17Karnataka16Surat14Rajkot13Patna4Jabalpur2Calcutta2Jodhpur1Amritsar1Guwahati1Agra1SC1

Key Topics

Section 80P178Deduction96Section 80P(2)(a)88Section 139(1)76Section 143(1)75Condonation of Delay53Section 80P(2)(d)51Section 143(3)50Section 80A

THE ERODE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EMP CO-OP T& C LIMITED,ERODE vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), ERODE

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 509/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.509 & 510/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-2019 & 2020-2021)

For Appellant: Ms. G. Vardini Karthik, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(6)Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

Showing 1–20 of 174 · Page 1 of 9

...
44
Section 80P(2)43
Disallowance43
Addition to Income31

80P(2)(a)(i). Furnishing of Return of Income - Section 139(4) 3) The CIT(A) failed to see that the assessee had furnished his return of income within the time frame prescribed under section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Circular No. 13/2023 allows condonation of delay

THE ERODE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EMP CO-OP T& C LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, WARD 1 (1), ERODE

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 510/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jul 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.509 & 510/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-2019 & 2020-2021)

For Appellant: Ms. G. Vardini Karthik, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(6)Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

80P(2)(a)(i). Furnishing of Return of Income - Section 139(4) 3) The CIT(A) failed to see that the assessee had furnished his return of income within the time frame prescribed under section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Circular No. 13/2023 allows condonation of delay

THE TRIPLICANE COOP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, WARD-9(1), CHENNAI

Accordingly we direct\nthe AO to allow the claim of the assessee for both AY 2020-21 & 2021-22\nsince the facts are identical.\n4.\nIn result the appeal of the assessee for both AY 2020-21 & 2021-2...

ITA 2992/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Feb 2026AY 2020-21
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 250Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

delay in filing the return was condoned. Therefore, the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned from cooperative banks should be allowed.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": ["80P(2)(d)", "80P(4

M/S. KALAPET PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, WARD-4,, PUDUCHERRY

ITA 629/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand,JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. The only issue in these five appeals of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the denial of claim of deduction 3 I.T.A. Nos.179/Chny/2019, 627 to 630/Chny/2020 u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The assessee has raised identically worded grounds in all the appeals and hence

M/S. KALAPET PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,,PONDICHERRY vs. ITO, WARD-4,, PONDICHERRY

ITA 627/CHNY/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand,JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. The only issue in these five appeals of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the denial of claim of deduction 3 I.T.A. Nos.179/Chny/2019, 627 to 630/Chny/2020 u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The assessee has raised identically worded grounds in all the appeals and hence

KALAPET PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. ,PONDICHERRY vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -4, PUDUCHERRY

ITA 179/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand,JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. The only issue in these five appeals of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the denial of claim of deduction 3 I.T.A. Nos.179/Chny/2019, 627 to 630/Chny/2020 u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The assessee has raised identically worded grounds in all the appeals and hence

M/S. KALAPET PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, WARD-4,, PUDUCHERRY

ITA 630/CHNY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand,JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. The only issue in these five appeals of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the denial of claim of deduction 3 I.T.A. Nos.179/Chny/2019, 627 to 630/Chny/2020 u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The assessee has raised identically worded grounds in all the appeals and hence

M/S. KALAPET PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, WARD-4,, PUDUCHERRY

ITA 628/CHNY/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand,JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. The only issue in these five appeals of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the denial of claim of deduction 3 I.T.A. Nos.179/Chny/2019, 627 to 630/Chny/2020 u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The assessee has raised identically worded grounds in all the appeals and hence

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-4, COIMBATORE vs. THE TUDIYALUR CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL SERVICES LIMITED, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 468/CHNY/2025[2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 468/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2018-19 The Dcit, The Tudiyalur Co-Operative Non-Corporate Circle – 4, Vs. Agricultural Services Ltd., Coimbatore. No.1, Tudiyalur Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore – 641 042. Pan: Aaaat 3838L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. E. Pavuna Sundari, Cit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Jai V Vairav, Ca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10.06.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.06.2025

For Appellant: Ms. E. Pavuna Sundari, CITFor Respondent: Shri Jai V Vairav, CA
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 253(3)Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(4)

delay condonation application. 9. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The AO had denied the benefit of deduction u/s.80P of the Act for two reasons namely, (i) assessee was doing the business of banking and in light of insertion of section 80P(4

THIRUCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL CO-OP.MARKETING SOCIETY LTD.,THIRUCHENGODE vs. ITO,WARD 5, NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 300/CHNY/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

80P(4) of the Act. In relation to the Associate members, we are of the view 12 I.T.A. Nos.2954 to 2956/Chny/2017 & 298 to 300/Chny/2021 that the provisions of Section 22 read with Rule 32 of the Tamil Nadu Co- operative Societies Act, 1983 and Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules clearly determine the procedure to admit Associate members and accordingly

ITO WARD 5, NAMAKKAL vs. THE TIRHCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2956/CHNY/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

80P(4) of the Act. In relation to the Associate members, we are of the view 12 I.T.A. Nos.2954 to 2956/Chny/2017 & 298 to 300/Chny/2021 that the provisions of Section 22 read with Rule 32 of the Tamil Nadu Co- operative Societies Act, 1983 and Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules clearly determine the procedure to admit Associate members and accordingly

THIRUCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL CO-OP.MARKETING SOCIETY LTD.,THIRUCHENGODE vs. ITO,WARD 5, NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 299/CHNY/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

80P(4) of the Act. In relation to the Associate members, we are of the view 12 I.T.A. Nos.2954 to 2956/Chny/2017 & 298 to 300/Chny/2021 that the provisions of Section 22 read with Rule 32 of the Tamil Nadu Co- operative Societies Act, 1983 and Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules clearly determine the procedure to admit Associate members and accordingly

ITO WARD 5, NAMAKKAL vs. THE TIRHCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2955/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

80P(4) of the Act. In relation to the Associate members, we are of the view 12 I.T.A. Nos.2954 to 2956/Chny/2017 & 298 to 300/Chny/2021 that the provisions of Section 22 read with Rule 32 of the Tamil Nadu Co- operative Societies Act, 1983 and Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules clearly determine the procedure to admit Associate members and accordingly

ITO WARD 5, NAMAKKAL vs. THE TIRHCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2954/CHNY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

80P(4) of the Act. In relation to the Associate members, we are of the view 12 I.T.A. Nos.2954 to 2956/Chny/2017 & 298 to 300/Chny/2021 that the provisions of Section 22 read with Rule 32 of the Tamil Nadu Co- operative Societies Act, 1983 and Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules clearly determine the procedure to admit Associate members and accordingly

THIRUCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL CO-OP.MARKETING SOCIETY LTD,THIRUCHENGODE vs. CIT(A), SALEM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 298/CHNY/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

80P(4) of the Act. In relation to the Associate members, we are of the view 12 I.T.A. Nos.2954 to 2956/Chny/2017 & 298 to 300/Chny/2021 that the provisions of Section 22 read with Rule 32 of the Tamil Nadu Co- operative Societies Act, 1983 and Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules clearly determine the procedure to admit Associate members and accordingly

THE TRIPLICANE COOP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, WARD-9(1), CHENNAI

ITA 2993/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2992&2993/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2020-21 & 2021-22

For Appellant: Mr. B. Suresh, C.A ""For Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 250Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(1)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The coordinate bench in several judicial proceedings has been consistently holding a similar view. Now coming to the issued deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) being The Triplicane Coop Credit Society Ltd. :- 4 -: disallowed on the ground of return not being filed on time, the ld AR during the course of hearing submitted that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SALEM vs. PANDYAN GRAMA BANK, SALEM

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the CO of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2870/CHNY/2024[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2870/Chny/2024 & Co No.06/Chny/2025 (In Ita No.: 2870/Chny/2024) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 The Assistant Commissioner Of Pandyan Grama Bank, Income Tax, Vs. Now Known As Tamil Nadu Grama Circle 1, Bank, Salem. No.6, Yercaud Road, Hasthampatty, Salem – 636 007. [Pan: Aahat-7854-K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Assessee By : Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate & Shri. P. Gurusamy, I.T.P. Department By : Shri. Shivanand K Kalakeri, C.I.T. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 15.04.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27.06.2025

For Appellant: Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri. Shivanand K Kalakeri, C.I.T
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 80P

condone delay in filing of appeal and admit appeal filed by the revenue for adjudication. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee Pandyan Grama Bank had filed its Return of Income for the assessment year 2016-17 on 30.09.2016 declaring "NIL" income after claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Subsequently, the case

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WANAPARTHY BLOCK vs. TAMILNADU SPECIAL POLICE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE, TSP CAMP

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 363/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:363/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Income Tax Officer, Tamilnadu Special Police Non-Corporate Ward -7(3), Vs. Employees Cooperative, Chennai – 600 034. Avadi, Chennai – 600 054. [Pan:Aafat-0366-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. Sita Krishnamoorthy, J.C.I.T. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. G. Reddi Prakash, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.07.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha, Am: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Filed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, For The Assessment Year 2020-21, Dated 11.10.2024. 2. At The Outset, We Find That There Is A Delay Of 34 Days In Appeal Filed By The Revenue, For Which Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With Reasons For Delay Has Been Filed. After Considering The Petition Filed By The Revenue & Also Hearing Both The Parties, We Find That There Is A Reasonable Cause For The Revenue In Not Filing Appeal On Or Before The Due Date Prescribed Under The Law & Thus

For Appellant: Ms. Sita Krishnamoorthy, J.C.I.TFor Respondent: Shri. G. Reddi Prakash, C.A
Section 80PSection 80P(1)Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

condone delay in filing of appeal and admit appeal filed by the revenue for adjudication. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a cooperative society formed with the objective providing of credit facilities to its members. The assessee filed its return of income on 21.12.2020 declaring a gross total income of Rs.4

K274 UTHUKULI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,TIRUPUR vs. ITO, WARD 1(3), TIRUPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 586/CHNY/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A No.:586/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year 2017 – 2018

For Appellant: Ms. Vardini Karthick, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 80P

condone the delay of one day and admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. 3. The first issue in this appeal of the Assessee is as regards to the order of the CIT(A) confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in providing loans to its members, i.e. non-voting members and challenged the same. For this, the Assessee

R. ANBUVEL RAJAN ,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL RANGEL, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 2165/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

condone the delay of 262 days in filing of both the appeals and proceed to adjudicate the grounds of appeals raised by the assessee. adjudicate the grounds of appeals raised by the assessee. 3. Before adverting to the grounds raised in these appeals, it is first Before adverting to the grounds raised in these appeals, it is first Before adverting