Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 801A(4)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad24 Mumbai22 Delhi13 Kolkata10 Ahmedabad4 Bangalore3 Chennai3 Raipur2 Indore2 Jaipur2 Lucknow2 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 80I8 Section 14A3 Deduction3 Disallowance3 Section 802 Section 250(1)2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, COIMBATORE vs. M/S RPP INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED, ERODE

In the result, all these four appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 333/CHNY/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Shivanand K. Kalakeri, CITFor Respondent: Mr. N.Arjun Raj, Advocate

Section 250(1)Section 80Section 80I

condone the delay and treat the reasons as ‘sufficient cause’ and admit these appeals for adjudication. 3. The common grounds raised by Revenue for AY 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2017-18 read as under:- 1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-19,Chennai is against facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The learned Commissioner

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, COIMBATORE vs. M/S RPP INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED, ERODE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, COIMBATORE vs. M/S. RP INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED, ERODE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, COIMBATORE vs. M/S RPP INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED, ERODE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, COIMBATORE vs. M/S. RP INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED, ERODE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, CHENNAI