BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

477 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 57clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai477Mumbai427Delhi414Kolkata262Bangalore230Ahmedabad176Karnataka141Jaipur122Hyderabad115Pune113Chandigarh110Nagpur78Surat55Visakhapatnam52Lucknow48Indore41Calcutta38Panaji38Cochin32Rajkot22Raipur18SC16Cuttack16Amritsar15Patna14Guwahati10Telangana9Jodhpur6Dehradun6Agra6Allahabad6Varanasi5Jabalpur4Rajasthan4Orissa3A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 14842Section 143(3)35Addition to Income33Section 23432Condonation of Delay25Section 14724Section 5721Section 20016Disallowance

JAGATHESH,CHENNAI vs. AACIT, NCC-11(1), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1565/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1565/Chny/2025 ननिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Jagathesh, Acit, Flat 2A, Block V, Vs. Non- Corporate Circle - 11(1), Rani Meyammai Towers, Chennai. Mrc Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan:Aclpj-4702-H] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1566/Chny/2025 ननिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Jagathesh, Acit, Flat 2A, Block V, Vs. Non- Corporate Circle - 11(1), Rani Meyammai Towers, Chennai. Mrc Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan:Aclpj-4702-H] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri. ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 115BSection 133ASection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 183Section 197

Showing 1–20 of 477 · Page 1 of 24

...
16
Deduction16
TDS14
Section 13212
Section 271A
Section 69A

condoning the delay in filing the appeal belatedly before the Ld.CIT(A). 21. Now coming to the other issues in the case, the assessee has raised the following: 1. That no fresh tangible material was available before the AO for issue of notice u/s.148 of the Act. 2. That the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing

JAGATHESH,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1566/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1565/Chny/2025 ननिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Jagathesh, Acit, Flat 2A, Block V, Vs. Non- Corporate Circle - 11(1), Rani Meyammai Towers, Chennai. Mrc Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan:Aclpj-4702-H] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1566/Chny/2025 ननिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Jagathesh, Acit, Flat 2A, Block V, Vs. Non- Corporate Circle - 11(1), Rani Meyammai Towers, Chennai. Mrc Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan:Aclpj-4702-H] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri. ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 115BSection 133ASection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 183Section 197Section 271ASection 69A

condoning the delay in filing the appeal belatedly before the Ld.CIT(A). 21. Now coming to the other issues in the case, the assessee has raised the following: 1. That no fresh tangible material was available before the AO for issue of notice u/s.148 of the Act. 2. That the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1043/CHNY/2022[2014-2015]Status: HeardITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

57 taxman. Com 7 (Bom), wherein it was held that where assessee took voluntary decision not to assail the order of Tribunal and accepted the same, only because assessee succeeded on same issue 5 year later. the same could not be a sufficient cause to delay the condone of 5 years in filing the appeal. 8. In our considered view

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1037/CHNY/2022[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

57 taxman. Com 7 (Bom), wherein it was held that where assessee took voluntary decision not to assail the order of Tribunal and accepted the same, only because assessee succeeded on same issue 5 year later. the same could not be a sufficient cause to delay the condone of 5 years in filing the appeal. 8. In our considered view

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1039/CHNY/2022[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

57 taxman. Com 7 (Bom), wherein it was held that where assessee took voluntary decision not to assail the order of Tribunal and accepted the same, only because assessee succeeded on same issue 5 year later. the same could not be a sufficient cause to delay the condone of 5 years in filing the appeal. 8. In our considered view

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1040/CHNY/2022[2014-2015]Status: HeardITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

57 taxman. Com 7 (Bom), wherein it was held that where assessee took voluntary decision not to assail the order of Tribunal and accepted the same, only because assessee succeeded on same issue 5 year later. the same could not be a sufficient cause to delay the condone of 5 years in filing the appeal. 8. In our considered view

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1036/CHNY/2022[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

57 taxman. Com 7 (Bom), wherein it was held that where assessee took voluntary decision not to assail the order of Tribunal and accepted the same, only because assessee succeeded on same issue 5 year later. the same could not be a sufficient cause to delay the condone of 5 years in filing the appeal. 8. In our considered view

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1042/CHNY/2022[2014-2015]Status: HeardITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

57 taxman. Com 7 (Bom), wherein it was held that where assessee took voluntary decision not to assail the order of Tribunal and accepted the same, only because assessee succeeded on same issue 5 year later. the same could not be a sufficient cause to delay the condone of 5 years in filing the appeal. 8. In our considered view

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1038/CHNY/2022[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

57 taxman. Com 7 (Bom), wherein it was held that where assessee took voluntary decision not to assail the order of Tribunal and accepted the same, only because assessee succeeded on same issue 5 year later. the same could not be a sufficient cause to delay the condone of 5 years in filing the appeal. 8. In our considered view

M/S GOPURAM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD ,CHENNAI vs. ITO , TDS CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1041/CHNY/2022[2014-2015]Status: HeardITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1036-1039, 1040-1047 & 1048-1053/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 M/S.Gopuram Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., V. The Income Tax Officer, New No.31, Lazarus Church Road, Tds, Cpc, R.A.Puram, Ghaziabad. Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Aaacs 9903 R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.R.Devaraj, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.01.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

For Respondent: Mr.D.Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

57 taxman. Com 7 (Bom), wherein it was held that where assessee took voluntary decision not to assail the order of Tribunal and accepted the same, only because assessee succeeded on same issue 5 year later. the same could not be a sufficient cause to delay the condone of 5 years in filing the appeal. 8. In our considered view

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. ABAN OFFSHORE LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1672/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

For Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

condoning the delay, however, not discussed the issues on merits. The assessee has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal on merits. The sole issue that came up for our consideration from this appeal is additions towards forex loss. Initially, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 13.09.2019 set aside the issue of disallowance of forex

M/S ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CORPORATE CIRCLE, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 797/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

For Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

condoning the delay, however, not discussed the issues on merits. The assessee has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal on merits. The sole issue that came up for our consideration from this appeal is additions towards forex loss. Initially, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 13.09.2019 set aside the issue of disallowance of forex

ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2757/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

For Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

condoning the delay, however, not discussed the issues on merits. The assessee has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal on merits. The sole issue that came up for our consideration from this appeal is additions towards forex loss. Initially, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 13.09.2019 set aside the issue of disallowance of forex

M/S. ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCITCORPORATE CIRCLE1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 798/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

For Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

condoning the delay, however, not discussed the issues on merits. The assessee has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal on merits. The sole issue that came up for our consideration from this appeal is additions towards forex loss. Initially, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 13.09.2019 set aside the issue of disallowance of forex

ANAND ENGINEERING PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,,TRICHY vs. DDIT, CPC,, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1375/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1375/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-2016) Anand Engineering Products Pvt Vs. The Assessing Officer, Limited, Corporate Ward 1(1) D-56, Developed Plots Estate, Chennai. Thuvakudi, Trichy 620 015. [Pan: Aafca 1512R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri A.S. Ramakrishnan, C.A., ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Irs, Jcit.

For Appellant: Shri A.S. Ramakrishnan, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, IRS, JCIT
Section 115JSection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 249(2)(c)Section 249(3)

Section 249(2) of the Act, and there is no sufficient cause for condonation of the delay in filing of the appeal, the present appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. Aggrieved, assessee filed an appeal before us. 4 ITA No.1375/Chny/2024. 4. We have perused the orders of ld.CIT(A) and ld.AO (CPC). We have also gone through the reasons given

GOLDQUEST INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2283/CHNY/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Mar 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. G. Seetharaman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. A.V. Sreekantha, JCIT
Section 10(34)Section 131Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 249

57,726/- as on 31.03.2008 for the financial year 2007-08. The Assessing Officer issued notice u/s.148 of the Act and in compliance to notice, the return of income was filed with total income of "24,25,460/- and was processed u/s.143(1) of the Act on 12.11.2013, the company filed adjournment letter stating details called

HARI FOUNDATION,COIMBATORE vs. DLC-CA-(211)(1), ACIT EXEMPTIONS, COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 917/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.917/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 V. Hari Foundation, The Acit (Exemptions), 3-1, Indira Nagar, Coimbatore. Kuniamuthur S.O., Coimbatore-641 035. [Pan: Aabth 2056 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri AG. SathyanarayanaFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ba)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 154

section 11-Held, yes [Paras 4 and 5] [In favour of assessee]’. Citing the aforesaid decision of Tribunal, Ld AR prayed that sec.11 exemption may be granted. 4. Per contra, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the Circular F. No. 173/193/2019ITAI, dated 23-4-2019 which empowers the Ld.CIT to condone the delay up to ‘365’ days in filing Form

KELLER (M) SDN BHD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT INTL TAX 1(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1319/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1319/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-2019) Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Keller (M) Sdn Bhd, Income Tax, 7Th Floor, Centennial Square, International Taxation 1(2) No.6A, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. [Pan: Aagck 8014M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Ashik Shah, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit.

For Appellant: Shri. Ashik Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CIT
Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 239Section 263

condonation of delay 1 filed before the CBDT 1.1. Form 26AS of the Appellant for AY 2018-19 5 1.2. Form 26AS of the Appellant for AY 2019-20 9 1.3. Tax Audit Report in Form 3CA and 3CD of the Appellant 13 for AY 2018-19 1.4. Tax Audit Report in Form 3CA and 3CD of the Appellant

MALINI,THIRUNINDRAVUR vs. ACIT, NCC-22(1), TAMBARAM

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2362/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyand Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकरअपीलसं/.Ita No.:2362/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2018-19 Malini, The Assistant Commissioner Of 7, Ganapathy Puram, Near Vs. Income Tax, Ragvendra Nagar, Periyapalayam Non Corporate Circle 22(1), (Tbm), Road, Thiruninravur 602 024, Chennai. Tamil Nadu. [Pan: Ajspm-9167-B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Ms. Gauthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाईक"तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.03.2025 घोषणाक"तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27.03.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Dated 25.06.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2018-19. 2. We Find That This Appeal Is Filed With A Delay Of 17 Days. The Assessee Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Explaining Reasons For The Said Delay & Prayed For Condonation Of That Delay. On Perusal Of The Condonation Petition & Upon Hearing The Ld. Ar & Ld. Dr, We Find That The Reasons Explained By The Assessee Are Bonafide & Therefore, The Delay Is Condoned & Admitted The Appeal For Adjudication.

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gauthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 145ASection 250Section 56(2)(viii)Section 57

delay is condoned and admitted the appeal for adjudication. 3. The only effective ground raised in the appeal is whether the ld. CIT(A) is justified in confirming the addition of ₹.97,44,420/- being 50% of the receipt of interest on enhanced compensation made by the Assessing Officer. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed

ANANYA INFRA STRUCTURE PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2390/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2389 & 2390/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12

Section 203ASection 234BSection 57

delay of one day in filing of the appeals stand condoned and the appeals are disposed off on merits. ITA No.2389/Chny/2017 for the AY 2010-11: 5. In the assessee’s appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds: 1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income (Appeals)-3, is wrong, illegal and is opposed