BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh54Indore22Bangalore12Pune9Surat9Delhi8Mumbai6Ahmedabad6Jaipur5Chennai4Nagpur3Hyderabad3Agra2Kolkata2Rajkot2Patna1Amritsar1Punjab & Haryana1Raipur1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1SC1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 54B7Section 54F5Section 143(3)4Section 2634Deduction4Capital Gains3Long Term Capital Gains3Addition to Income2

KESHAV SUNDERAM RAJAM,CHENNAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 780/CHNY/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.780/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Keshav Sunderam Rajam, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, New No. 27, Old No. 11, Sathya International Taxation 2(1), Narayana Avenue, Off Boat Club Road, Chennai. R.A. Puram, Chennai 600 028. [Pan:Atopr1473P] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S.V. Venkateshwaran, Fca ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 20.12.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 16, Chennai Dated 29.06.2022 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Delayed By Ten Days In Filing The Appeal, For Which, The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of The Delay In The Form Of An Affidavit, To Which; The Ld. Dr Has Not Raised Any Serious Objection. Consequently, Since The Assessee Was Prevented By 2

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Venkateshwaran, FCAFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 54B

delay of two days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Brief facts of the case are that in this case assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was completed on 21.03.2016. The assessee is a Non-Resident sold a capital asset on 08.01.2013 in which the assessee

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. CHARUMATHY SESHADRI, CHENNAI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is treated as partly allowed for

ITA 886/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Oct 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. N.R. Govindarajan, CA &
Section 139Section 54F

delay is condoned. The Dr argued the case supporting the assessment order and on the lines of grounds of appeal. Per contra, the AR filed a paper book and supported the order of the CIT(A). 6. We heard the rival contentions, gone through the orders and the material in the paper book. On 04.11.2010, the assessee sold vacant land

P. ANANTHRAM,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, NON-CORPORATE CIRCLE-2, COMBATORE MAIN BUILDING, 63, RACE COURSE ROAD, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 155/CHNY/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.155/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2016-17 P. Ananth Ram, The Asst. Commissioner Of 36, West Venkataswamy Road, Vs. Income Tax, R.S. Puram, Non Corporate Circle-2, Coimbtore – 641 002. Coimbatore. [Pan: Anxpa-6262-C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S. Marudhu Pandyan, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.12.2022

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. Marudhu Pandyan, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The only issue in this appeal of assessee is as regards to the order of PCIT revising the assessment which is already been examined by the A.O during the course of assessment proceedings i.e., deduction claimed by the assessee on long term capital loss/gain. :- 3 -: For this, the assessee has raised various

THARMIYA SUBRAMANIAN RAMILA,MADURAI vs. ITO, WARD-1(7), MADURAI

ITA 3503/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Ms. S. Padmavathyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.3503/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 Thamiya Subramanian Ramila, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 391, K.K. Nagar, 8Th East Street, Ward 1(7), Madurai 625 020. Madurai. [Pan:Aehpr1869M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri P. Ranga Ramanujam, Ca ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Latchana, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.12.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 19.02.2026 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 04.02.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. We Find That This Appeal Is Filed With A Delay Of 226 Days. The Assessee Filed An Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay Explaining The Reasons That She Is An Illiterate & Her Husband Has To Look After The Tax Matters

For Appellant: Shri P. Ranga Ramanujam, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Latchana, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2(14)Section 54BSection 54F

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. Ground No. 1 is general in nature and requires no adjudication. 4. Ground Nos. 5 to 12 raised by the assessee in challenging the action of the ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition made under section 54B