BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 44Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7Hyderabad4Lucknow4Delhi3Chennai3Cuttack2Bangalore1Jaipur1Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 2639Section 271B8Section 44A7Section 1473Section 1482Section 143(3)2Penalty2Condonation of Delay2

VINAYAKA MEDICAL CARE CENTRE PVT LTD,SALEM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, SALEM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 90/CHNY/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jan 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 90/Chny/ 2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12)

For Appellant: Dr. S. Palani Kumar, CIT(DR)For Respondent: 22.12.2021
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 245D(4)Section 263

44A, Second Agraharam, Circle-1, Salem. Salem-636 001. PAN: AAACV 6921A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Mr. T. Vasudevan, Advocate अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे / Appellant by : Dr. S. Palani Kumar, CIT(DR) ""यथ"क"ओरसे/ Respondent by : 22.12.2021 सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date of hearing : घोषणाक"तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement 03.01.2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER G.MANJUNATHA, AM: This

IYERGOPAL ASHOKKUMAR,COIMBATORE vs. ITO-CHE-W-(61)(11), COIMBATOE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 182/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.182/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 Iyergopal Ashokkumar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 658, P.N. Palayam Road, Puliyakulam, Che-W-61(11), Coimbatore 641 045. Coimbatore. [Pan:Ahqpa2689G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N. Arjunraj For Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 28.03.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12.04.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), (National Faceless Appeal Centre) [Nfac], Delhi Dated 14.12.2022 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Delayed By Two Days In Filing The Appeal Before The Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Against Which, The Ld. Dr Has Not 2

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjunraj for Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271BSection 4Section 44A

condone the delay of two days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has not filed his return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 under section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. A recovery survey was conducted in the business premises

KARTHIKEYARAJ,ULUNDURPET vs. ITO, WARD-1,, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2392/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2392/Chny/2024 िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C. Murugesan, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 271BSection 44A

delay is condoned accordingly. 3. When the case was called for hearings, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. The case was first listed 21.11.2024, but no one appeared from assessee side. The notice was then served through Ld DR, and case was fixed on 10.12.2024. Again no one appeared from assessee side and case was re-fixed