SMT. G. PADMINI,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 2572/CHNY/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 May 2017AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2572/Mds/2016 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Smt. G. Padmini, V. The Income Tax Officer, C/O. S. Sridhar, Non Corporate Ward 5(4), New No.14, Old No.82, Flat No.5, Chennai. 1St Avenue, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai – 600020. Pan:Aahpp0733G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri A.V. Sreekanth,Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03.05.2017 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.05.2017 आदेश आदेश /O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per A. Mohan Alankamony: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Aggrieved By The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Chennai In Ita No.140/Cit(A)-5/14-15 Dated 26.07.2016 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Passed U/S. 271B Of The Act.
For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.V. Sreekanth,JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 271BSection 273BSection 44A
condoned the delay in filing the audit report and
thereby directed the Ld.AO to delete the penalty levied U/s.271B of
the Act in similar circumstances. Therefore it was pleaded that in the
case of the assessee also relief may be granted. The Ld.DR on other
hand argued in support of the orders of the Revenue.
5. We have heard