Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune28 Karnataka21 Delhi20 Jaipur14 Kolkata14 Ahmedabad11 Mumbai11 Bangalore9 Hyderabad7 Chennai6 Cochin6 Visakhapatnam5 Indore4 Chandigarh4 Rajkot4 Amritsar2 Surat2 Guwahati1 SC1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271E12 Section 234E12 Section 200A8 Section 271D7 Section 269T6 Section 269S5 Penalty4 Condonation of Delay4 Section 2512

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. JAYAPRIYA COMPANY, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the\nCross-Objection filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1899/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

condone the delay of `2′ days in filing of the appeal and the\nappeal filed by the Revenue is taken up for hearing on merits.\n3. Briefly stated, the facts relating to the present appeal are that, a\nsearch action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted on Jayapriya group on 16-\n12-2021. In the course of search

M/S. MAHESHWARI BUILDERS,ADYAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD-15(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 60/CHNY/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. JAYAPRIYA COMPANY, CHENNAI

M/S. MAHESHWARI BUILDERS,ADYAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD-15(3), CHENNAI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. JAYAPRIYA COMPANY, CHENNAI

M/S. MAHESHWARI BUILDERS,ADYAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD-15(3), CHENNAI

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. DR. GANESAN'S HITECH DIAGNOSTICS CENTRE P LTD., CHENNAI

T.KOLANDAIVELU & COMPANY,SALEM vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALEM

T KOLLANDAIVELU & COMPANY,SALEM vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALEM

K.N.S. TRANSPORTS,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO, WARD-1, NAMAKKAL