Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur38 Delhi28 Cochin24 Jaipur22 Karnataka21 Ahmedabad15 Nagpur8 Bangalore6 Mumbai5 Chandigarh5 Visakhapatnam3 Chennai3 Lucknow2 Kolkata2 Surat2 Panaji1 SC1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 2713 Section 143(2)2 Section 271C2 Section 2012 Section 194C2 Section 271B2 Section 273B2 Addition to Income2 Natural Justice2

M/S. MAHESHWARI BUILDERS,ADYAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD-15(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 60/CHNY/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand, JCIT

Section 143(3)Section 253(2)Section 271BSection 273BSection 44ASection 5

condoning the delay of 83 days. Ld. Sr. DR strongly opposed the contentions made by the ld Counsel and submitted that the penalty has been rightfully imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A). 8. We have heard the rival contentions, perused the material on record and gone through the written submissions made

M/S. MAHESHWARI BUILDERS,ADYAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD-15(3), CHENNAI

M/S. MAHESHWARI BUILDERS,ADYAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD-15(3), CHENNAI

P.K.POWER APPLIANCES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 5(3), CHENNAI

TH 130 M/S BHARATHIYAR PWCS LTD.,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO, SALEM