M/S. KARUR VYSYA BANK,,KARUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 2 (1),, TRICHY

condonation of\nwhich has been sought by Ld. AR and the Id.DR respectively, on the\nground that the delay occurred due to lockdown situation arising out\nof Covid-19 Pandemic and the period of delay falls in the exclusion\nperiod commencing from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022. Keeping in\nview the adverse situation arising out of Covid-19 pandemic, we\ncondone

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WANAPARTHY BLOCK vs. TAMILNADU SPECIAL POLICE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE, TSP CAMP

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:363/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Income Tax Officer, Tamilnadu Special Police Non-Corporate Ward -7(3), Vs. Employees Cooperative, Chennai – 600 034. Avadi, Chennai – 600 054. [Pan:Aafat-0366-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. Sita Krishnamoorthy, J.C.I.T. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. G. Reddi Prakash, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.07.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha, Am: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Filed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, For The Assessment Year 2020-21, Dated 11.10.2024. 2. At The Outset, We Find That There Is A Delay Of 34 Days In Appeal Filed By The Revenue, For Which Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With Reasons For Delay Has Been Filed. After Considering The Petition Filed By The Revenue & Also Hearing Both The Parties, We Find That There Is A Reasonable Cause For The Revenue In Not Filing Appeal On Or Before The Due Date Prescribed Under The Law & Thus

condone delay in filing of appeal and admit appeal filed by the revenue for adjudication. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a cooperative society formed with the objective providing of credit facilities to its members. The assessee filed its return of income on 21.12.2020 declaring a gross total income of Rs.4

K1104 ELAYAMUTHUR PROMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,TIRUPPUR vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), TIRUPPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for both the

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 1040 & 1041/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18 K 1104 Elayamuthur Primary Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Co-Operative Credit V. Ward -2(4), Society, Tirupur. Elayamuthur, Udumalpet, Tirupur – 642 154. [Pan: Aabak-3636-Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. R.V. Aroonprasaad, Addl.Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 23.07.2024 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.09.2024

condone delay in filing of appeals and admit appeals filed by the assessee for adjudication. 3. The assessee has raised the following common grounds of appeal for both the assessment years: 1. The Order of the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) is bad and erroneous in law. 2. The Learned Commissioner (Appeals) erred in not considering the submissions made and decisions relied

K1104 ELAAMUTHUR PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SCOIETY,TIRUPPUR vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), TIRUPPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for both the

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 1040 & 1041/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18 K 1104 Elayamuthur Primary Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Co-Operative Credit V. Ward -2(4), Society, Tirupur. Elayamuthur, Udumalpet, Tirupur – 642 154. [Pan: Aabak-3636-Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. R.V. Aroonprasaad, Addl.Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 23.07.2024 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.09.2024

condone delay in filing of appeals and admit appeals filed by the assessee for adjudication. 3. The assessee has raised the following common grounds of appeal for both the assessment years: 1. The Order of the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) is bad and erroneous in law. 2. The Learned Commissioner (Appeals) erred in not considering the submissions made and decisions relied

M/S SUSEE AUTOMOTIVE (P) LTD.,MADURAI vs. DCIT,CORPORATE CIRCLE -2, MADURAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manjunatha. Gआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.784/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Susee Automotive (P.) Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner Of No.25, Tamilsangam Road, Vs. Income Tax, Madurai – 625 001. Corporate Circle-2, [Pan: Aaocs-8509-H] Madurai. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.832/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S. Susee Automotive (P.) Ltd., Income Tax, Vs. No.25, Tamilsangam Road, Corporate Circle-2, Madurai – 625 001. Madurai. [Pan: Aaocs-8509-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri T. Vasudevan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S.R. Karuppusamy, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 31.05.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2023

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. First we will deal with the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No.832/Chny/2020. The only issue in this appeal of Revenue is as ITA Nos.784 & 832Chny/2020 :- 3 -: regards to the order of CIT(A) in deleting the addition made by A.O holding that the loan received by the assessee-company from the seven

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE,, MADURAI vs. M/S. SUSEE AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.,, MADURAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manjunatha. Gआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.784/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Susee Automotive (P.) Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner Of No.25, Tamilsangam Road, Vs. Income Tax, Madurai – 625 001. Corporate Circle-2, [Pan: Aaocs-8509-H] Madurai. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.832/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Dy. Commissioner Of M/S. Susee Automotive (P.) Ltd., Income Tax, Vs. No.25, Tamilsangam Road, Corporate Circle-2, Madurai – 625 001. Madurai. [Pan: Aaocs-8509-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri T. Vasudevan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S.R. Karuppusamy, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 31.05.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2023

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. First we will deal with the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No.832/Chny/2020. The only issue in this appeal of Revenue is as ITA Nos.784 & 832Chny/2020 :- 3 -: regards to the order of CIT(A) in deleting the addition made by A.O holding that the loan received by the assessee-company from the seven

MADURAI AGRI BUSINESS INCUBATION FORUM ,COIMBATORE vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

251. In this case, while considering the issue whether the CIT(E) has power to condone the delay in filing application for grant of approval under section 10(23C) of the Act or not, the Hon’ble High Court held that where there is no provision to empower the statutory authority to condone the delay, then the authority cannot condone

ADITYA BIRLA MONEY LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. JCIT (OSD), CO. CIRCLE - 1 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The only issue in this appeal of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the action of AO in restricting deprecation @ 15% on V-SAT equipment instead claimed by assessee at 60%. For this, assessee has raised following six grounds:- 3 2. The Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) erred

M/S. RAKTIKANTA PANDA NIRANJAN PANDA,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-22(4), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1781/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 Raktikanta Panda Niranjan Panda, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. B, 301, Block B, Tvs Emerald Non Corporate Ward 22(4), Green Hills, No. 345/2B, Tambaram. Nedungundram, Ngo Nagar, Alapakkam, Perungalathur, Chennai 600 063. [Pan:Adjpn9359H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Y. Sridhar, F.C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Dr. M. Mohan Babu, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.10.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 10.06.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. We Find That This Appeal Is Filed With A Delay Of 293 Days. The Assessee Filed An Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons.

2 I.T.A. No.1781/Chny/25 Upon hearing both the parties and on examination of the said affidavit, we find the reasons stated by the assessee are bonafide, which really prevented in filing the appeal in time. Thus, the delay is condoned and admitted the appeal for adjudication. 3. The assessee raised 7 grounds of appeal, amongst which, the only issue emanates

MENAKURU SUKUMAR REDDY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT(A), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

condone delay in filing of appeals and admit the appeals filed by the revenue for adjudication. 3. The brief facts of the relevant assessment years are as under: 3.1 A.Y. 2015-16: The brief facts emanating from the records are that the assessee is a HUF, engaged in the business of Renting out properties and also received interest income

MENAKURU SUKUMAR REDDY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT(A), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

condone delay in filing of appeals and admit the appeals filed by the revenue for adjudication. 3. The brief facts of the relevant assessment years are as under: 3.1 A.Y. 2015-16: The brief facts emanating from the records are that the assessee is a HUF, engaged in the business of Renting out properties and also received interest income

TIRUPUR SOUTH ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS,, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1553/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2022-23 Tirupur South Rotary Charitable Trust, Assistant Commissioner Of South Rotary Hall, Income Tax (Exemptions), Opp Nataraja Theatre, Tirupur, Coimbatore. Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 604. [Pan: Aaett0308E] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri S.Bhupendran, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.Krishna Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12.08.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.08.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

251(2) of giving an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 3.0 Per contra, the Ld. DR relied upon the order of lower authorities. 4.0 We have heard the rival submissions in the light of material available on records. At this stage, we deem it appropriate to reproduce the exact content of the order of the Ld.First Appellate Authorityas

SHAMIMULLAH,VELLORE vs. ITO, NCW-11(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.473/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Shamimullah, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 56, Masuthi Street, Non Corporate Ward 11(2), Near Canara Bank, Arakkonam, Chennai. Vellore 631 001. [Pan:Dalps5068E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Gopalan, Irs (Jcit Retd.) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Krishna Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 08.05.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.05.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi:

2 I.T.A. No.473/Chny/25 we find the reasons stated by the assessee are bonafide, which really prevented in filing the appeal in time. Thus, the delay is condoned and admitted the appeal for adjudication. 3. The assessee raised 7 grounds of appeal amongst which, the only issue emanates for our consideration as as to whether the ld. CIT(A) is justified

P. PALANISAMY,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

P. PALANISAMY,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, COIMBATORE

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

PALANISAMY RAGHUPATHY,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

M/S. P.P. FINANCIERS,KARUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

P.P. ENTERPRISES,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

M/S. P.P. FINANCIERS,KARUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals