BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai52Hyderabad31Bangalore30Delhi26Ahmedabad22Jaipur16Kolkata7Surat7Indore6Chennai5Chandigarh5Nagpur5Pune4Rajkot4Jabalpur2Raipur1Varanasi1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 578Section 143(3)5Section 203A4Section 693Section 234B2Section 234A2Section 2542Deduction2Survey u/s 133A

SHANMUGASUNDARAM VENKATACHALAPATHY,TIRUNELVELI, TAMILNADU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI

In the result, grounds of appeal raised

ITA 2056/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Chennai26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Shanmugasundaram I.T.O., Venkatachalapathy, Vs. Ward-4, C/O-Durv & Associates Llp, No. Tirunelveli. 10/80, Avm Avenue 3Rd Street, Virugambakkam, Chennai-600092 (Tamil Nadu) Pan No. Acapv 3414 B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 234ASection 250Section 56(2)(vii)Section 69

234D of the Act which is consequential. The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, vary, omit, substitute or amend the above grounds of appeal, before commencement of during proceedings before the Hon'ble Tribunal.” 2. The assessee has also filed additional grounds of appeal which reads as under: 3 ITA2056/Chny/2024 Shri Shanmugaundaram Venkatachalapathy Vs ITO “12. The Learned

2
Depreciation2
Condonation of Delay2

ANANYA INFRA STRUCTURE PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2389/CHNY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2389 & 2390/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12

Section 203ASection 234BSection 57

delay of one day in filing of the appeals stand condoned and the appeals are disposed off on merits. ITA No.2389/Chny/2017 for the AY 2010-11: 5. In the assessee’s appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds: 1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income (Appeals)-3, is wrong, illegal and is opposed

ANANYA INFRA STRUCTURE PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2390/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2389 & 2390/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12

Section 203ASection 234BSection 57

delay of one day in filing of the appeals stand condoned and the appeals are disposed off on merits. ITA No.2389/Chny/2017 for the AY 2010-11: 5. In the assessee’s appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds: 1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income (Appeals)-3, is wrong, illegal and is opposed

PENTA MEDIA GRAPHICS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result , appeal in ITA no

ITA 1406/CHNY/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 May 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Duvvuru R.L.Reddy

For Respondent: Mr. A.Sundararajan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 254

condoning the delay of four days in filing this appeal late beyond time stipulated under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and admit both these appeals to be adjudicated on merits in accordance with law. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by assessee in memo of appeal(s) filed with the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (hereinafter called “the Tribunal

PENTA MEDIA GRAPHICS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result , appeal in ITA no

ITA 1407/CHNY/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 May 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Duvvuru R.L.Reddy

For Respondent: Mr. A.Sundararajan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 254

condoning the delay of four days in filing this appeal late beyond time stipulated under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and admit both these appeals to be adjudicated on merits in accordance with law. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by assessee in memo of appeal(s) filed with the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (hereinafter called “the Tribunal