BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 158Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore18Kolkata13Delhi10Mumbai9Chandigarh8Lucknow4Guwahati3Chennai3Jaipur2Cuttack1SC1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 14A9Section 271(1)(c)3Short Term Capital Gains3Deduction3Penalty3TDS3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Condonation of Delay

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. SHRI S. MARTIN, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2382/CHNY/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2382/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3146 & 3147/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri S. Martin, Income Tax, V. No.335-339, Daisy Plaza, 6Th Street, Gandhipuram, Central Circle -2, Income Tax Building, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 011. Coimbatore – 641 018. Pan : Aewpm 3703 Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sailendra Mamidi, PCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. Let’s first take assessment year 2009-10 in I.T.A. No.2382/Chny/2016. 4. Shri Sailendra Mamidi, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that during the course of assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer disallowed ₹1,66,96,393/- towards insurance ₹90,86,349/- receipts and towards business expenditure. According to the Ld. D.R., the Assessing

3

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, COIMBATORE vs. S.MARTIN, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3146/CHNY/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Oct 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2382/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3146 & 3147/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri S. Martin, Income Tax, V. No.335-339, Daisy Plaza, 6Th Street, Gandhipuram, Central Circle -2, Income Tax Building, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 011. Coimbatore – 641 018. Pan : Aewpm 3703 Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sailendra Mamidi, PCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. Let’s first take assessment year 2009-10 in I.T.A. No.2382/Chny/2016. 4. Shri Sailendra Mamidi, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that during the course of assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer disallowed ₹1,66,96,393/- towards insurance ₹90,86,349/- receipts and towards business expenditure. According to the Ld. D.R., the Assessing

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, COIMBATORE vs. S.MARTIN, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3147/CHNY/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Oct 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2382/Chny/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3146 & 3147/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Shri S. Martin, Income Tax, V. No.335-339, Daisy Plaza, 6Th Street, Gandhipuram, Central Circle -2, Income Tax Building, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 011. Coimbatore – 641 018. Pan : Aewpm 3703 Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sailendra Mamidi, PCITFor Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. Let’s first take assessment year 2009-10 in I.T.A. No.2382/Chny/2016. 4. Shri Sailendra Mamidi, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that during the course of assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer disallowed ₹1,66,96,393/- towards insurance ₹90,86,349/- receipts and towards business expenditure. According to the Ld. D.R., the Assessing