BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

77 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune226Ahmedabad142Mumbai122Jaipur86Chennai77Kolkata52Delhi44Calcutta34Hyderabad33Surat27Chandigarh24Rajkot22Nagpur18Bangalore16Lucknow14Amritsar11Cochin11Indore10Visakhapatnam6Agra5Patna5Jabalpur4Panaji4Jodhpur3Raipur2Guwahati2Ranchi2Dehradun2Allahabad2

Key Topics

Section 12A315Section 12A(1)(ac)176Section 80G138Exemption75Section 80G(5)71Charitable Trust26Section 1124Condonation of Delay21Section 80G(5)(iii)

RAJAH ANNAMALAIPURAM SRI IYYAPPASWAMI TEMPLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 2866/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr.P.M. Kathir, Advocate &For Respondent: Mr.ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act‘) seeking regular registration u/s.12AB of the Act. 2. There is a delay of ‘1035’ days in filing of appeal (ITA No.2866/Chny/2025) against the impugned order of the CPC/PCIT(E); and there is a delay of ‘47’ days in filing of appeal (ITA No.2865/Chny/2025) against

RAJAH ANNAMALAIPURAM SRI IYYAPPASWAMI TEMPLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

Showing 1–20 of 77 · Page 1 of 4

16
Section 12A(1)(ab)12
Natural Justice12
Section 1211
ITA 2865/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr.P.M. Kathir, Advocate &For Respondent: Mr.ARV Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act‘) seeking regular registration u/s.12AB of the Act. 2. There is a delay of ‘1035’ days in filing of appeal (ITA No.2866/Chny/2025) against the impugned order of the CPC/PCIT(E); and there is a delay of ‘47’ days in filing of appeal (ITA No.2865/Chny/2025) against

ALAMELU MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,THIRUVALLUR vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 814/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.814/Chny/2025 Alamelu Memorial Charitable Trust, Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax No. 46, 2Nd Street, Sp Munusamy [Exemptions], Nagar, Gnt Road, Thervazhi, Chennai. Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur 601 201. [Pan:Aaita6393E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri K. Vishva Padmanabhan, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Nandha Kumar, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 11.03.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai In Rejecting The Application Filed In Form 10Ab Under Clause (Iii) Of First Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri K. Vishva Padmanabhan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri G. Nandha Kumar, CIT
Section 10Section 12ASection 4Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

12A of the Act, inserting section 12AB of the Act and amending the first and second proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act. 7.4 We are concerned with the provisions of section 80G of the Act in these cases. In view of the above provisions, the deduction u/s.80G of the Act in respect of a donation

MADURAI AGRI BUSINESS INCUBATION FORUM ,COIMBATORE vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 875/CHNY/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

Section 10Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

section 10(23C) of the Act or not, the Hon’ble High Court held that where there is no provision to empower the statutory authority to condone the delay, then the authority cannot condone such delay. The Hon’ble High Court has considered the judgments of Hon’ble Supreme court in the case of State of U.P v Harish Chandra

VATHSALYAM TRUST,HOSUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), SALEM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3196/CHNY/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Mar 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Ms. A.Sharren, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. R. Mohan Reddy, CIT
Section 119Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the Act, which reads as under : “Provided that where the application is filed beyond the time allowed in sub- clauses (i) to (vi), the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, if he considers that there is a reasonable cause for delay in filing the application, condone

VIRUDHUNAGAR S VELLAICHAMY NADAR POLYTECHNIC MANAGING BOARD,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 153/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.153, 154, 155 & 156/Chny/2025

For Appellant: Shri G. Akash, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri V. Justin, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)

section 12A(1)(ab) of the Act w.e.f 01.4.2018 filed an application for registration u/s. 12A(1)(ab) of the Act on 31.01.2021 and the Ld. CIT(E) granted provisional registration on 27.05.2021 from A.Y 2021- 22 to 2023-24. The assessee has filed the present appeal against granting registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act for three

VIRUDHUNAGAR S VELLAICHAMY NADAR POLYTECHNIC MANAGING BOARD,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS, , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 155/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.153, 154, 155 & 156/Chny/2025

For Appellant: Shri G. Akash, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri V. Justin, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)

section 12A(1)(ab) of the Act w.e.f 01.4.2018 filed an application for registration u/s. 12A(1)(ab) of the Act on 31.01.2021 and the Ld. CIT(E) granted provisional registration on 27.05.2021 from A.Y 2021- 22 to 2023-24. The assessee has filed the present appeal against granting registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act for three

VIRUDHUNAGAR S VELLAICHAMY NADAR POLYTECHNIC MANAGING BOARD,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 156/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.153, 154, 155 & 156/Chny/2025

For Appellant: Shri G. Akash, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri V. Justin, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)

section 12A(1)(ab) of the Act w.e.f 01.4.2018 filed an application for registration u/s. 12A(1)(ab) of the Act on 31.01.2021 and the Ld. CIT(E) granted provisional registration on 27.05.2021 from A.Y 2021- 22 to 2023-24. The assessee has filed the present appeal against granting registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act for three

VIRUDHUNAGAR S VELLAICHAMY NADAR POLYTECHNIC MANAGING BOARD,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. CIT, EXMEPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 154/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.153, 154, 155 & 156/Chny/2025

For Appellant: Shri G. Akash, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri V. Justin, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)

section 12A(1)(ab) of the Act w.e.f 01.4.2018 filed an application for registration u/s. 12A(1)(ab) of the Act on 31.01.2021 and the Ld. CIT(E) granted provisional registration on 27.05.2021 from A.Y 2021- 22 to 2023-24. The assessee has filed the present appeal against granting registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act for three

PROTECT AND RESCUE ANIMALS IN NEED INITIATIVE (PRANI),CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1151/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1151/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: - Protect & Rescue Animals In Need Commissioner Of Income Tax Initiative (Prani), (Exemptions), No.10, Door No.5, Bnb Flats, Chennai. 6Th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai- 600 083. [Pan: Aaftp0832N] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri M.Viswanathan, C.A. प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03.10.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri M.Viswanathan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Bipin C.N, CIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

condoning the delay in matters concerning 12A registrations. We have noted that while doing so, CBDT had primarily examined the issue of “continuing hardship” to the taxpayers in filing timely applications and thus being deprived of registration on such technical deficiencies. Registrations under section 12A and 80G are closely inter-linked and or rather supplementing their independent objectives. The present

SOCIETY FOR COMMUNITY ORGANISATION AND PEOPLES EDUCATION (SCOPE),TIRUCHIRAPPALLI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1127/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1127/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: - Society For Community Organization Commissioner Of Income Tax & Peoples Education (Scope), (Exemptions), No.17, 16Th Cross, Ahmed Colony, Chennai. Ramalinga Nagar, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu- 620 003. [Pan: Aaets3488C] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri N.Arjun Raj, Advocate, प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03.10.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri N.Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Bipin C.N, CIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

condoning the delay in matters concerning 12A registrations. We have noted that while doing so, CBDT had primarily examined the issue of “continuing hardship” to the taxpayers in filing timely applications and thus being deprived of registration on such technical deficiencies. Registrations under section 12A and 80G are closely inter-linked and or rather supplementing their independent objectives. The present

KAAKKUM KARANGAL,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD -3, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 1561/CHNY/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2024

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1561/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: - V. Kaakkum Karangal, The Income Tax Officer, Old No.11, New No.47, Exemption Ward-3, East Mada Street, Chennai. Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041. [Pan: Aaatk 5406 E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P.M.Kathir, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri V.Nandakumar, CIT
Section 10Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

12A on that date. (3)The order under clause (a), sub-clause (ii) of clause (b) and clause (c), of sub- section (1) shall be passed, in such form and manner as may be prescribed, before expiry of the period of three months, six months and one month, respectively, calculated from the end of the month in which the application

SHRI SAKTHI GANAPATHI TRUST,CHENNAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 579/CHNY/2023[---]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Dec 2023

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

12A(1)(ac)(iv) and clause (ii) of the first proviso to section 80G(5). The assessee trust claims that mere filing of wrong form does not disentitle the assessee to obtain the registration under section 12AB and the proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, especially when the CBDT has subsequently condoned the delay

ARUDHRA CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT,(EXEMPTIONS,)CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 578/CHNY/2023[---]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Dec 2023

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

12A(1)(ac)(iv) and clause (ii) of the first proviso to section 80G(5). The assessee trust claims that mere filing of wrong form does not disentitle the assessee to obtain the registration under section 12AB and the proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, especially when the CBDT has subsequently condoned the delay

ARUDHRA CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT,(EXEMPTIONS,)CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 577/CHNY/2023[--]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Dec 2023

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

12A(1)(ac)(iv) and clause (ii) of the first proviso to section 80G(5). The assessee trust claims that mere filing of wrong form does not disentitle the assessee to obtain the registration under section 12AB and the proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, especially when the CBDT has subsequently condoned the delay

LTCL PALANIAPPA CHRITIES TRUST ,CHENNAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 576/CHNY/2023[---]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Dec 2023

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

12A(1)(ac)(iv) and clause (ii) of the first proviso to section 80G(5). The assessee trust claims that mere filing of wrong form does not disentitle the assessee to obtain the registration under section 12AB and the proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, especially when the CBDT has subsequently condoned the delay

LTCL PALANIAPPA CHRITIES TRUST ,CHENNAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 575/CHNY/2023[--]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Dec 2023

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

12A(1)(ac)(iv) and clause (ii) of the first proviso to section 80G(5). The assessee trust claims that mere filing of wrong form does not disentitle the assessee to obtain the registration under section 12AB and the proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, especially when the CBDT has subsequently condoned the delay

SHRI SAKTHI GANAPATHI TRUST,CHENNAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 580/CHNY/2023[---]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Dec 2023

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Ms. N.V. Lakshmi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, IRS, CIT
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

12A(1)(ac)(iv) and clause (ii) of the first proviso to section 80G(5). The assessee trust claims that mere filing of wrong form does not disentitle the assessee to obtain the registration under section 12AB and the proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, especially when the CBDT has subsequently condoned the delay

CHEYYAR VIRUTCHAM EDUCATIONAL TRUST,THIRUVANNAMALAI, TAMILNADU vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NUNGAMBAKKAM CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 327/CHNY/2023[---]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.327/Chny/2023 Cheyyar Virutcham Educational Trust, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of 73, Arani Koot Road, Cheyyar, Income Tax (H.Qrs) Thiruvannamalai, (Exemptions), Tamil Nadu 604 407. Chennai. [Pan:Aabtc8538N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 17.01.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2024

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 12A(2)Section 154

condone the delay in filing the appeal and to admit the appeal for adjudication subject to the condition that the assessee should pay ₹.500/- to the State Legal Aid Authority, Hon’ble Madras High Court and produce necessary proof of payment of cost before the ITO (Exemption), Ward 3, Chennai. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee

VIRUDHUNAGAR HINDU THOLAN,VIRUDHUNAGAR vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals field by the assessee are

ITA 66/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.65 & 66/Chny/2025

For Appellant: Shri P.M. Kathir, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Bipin C.N, CIT
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

delay in filing both the appeals is hereby condoned. 3. The assessee is an old trust registered u/s 12AA and was required to apply for registration under clause (i) of section 12A(1)(ac