BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

106 results for “condonation of delay”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna467Mumbai181Delhi107Chennai106Bangalore87Pune83Ahmedabad58Kolkata58Hyderabad51Indore38Jaipur36Chandigarh36Lucknow25Nagpur23Cochin23Visakhapatnam19Surat15Raipur14Agra11Rajkot9Jodhpur8Jabalpur8Amritsar7Cuttack6Dehradun4Panaji3SC2Varanasi2Guwahati1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 234E137Section 154112Section 143(1)88Section 14766Section 143(3)53Rectification u/s 15452Addition to Income37Section 1136Section 250

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CHENNAI vs. ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal f

ITA 2600/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr.R. VijayaraghavanFor Respondent: Mr.R. Clement Ramesh
Section 2Section 35

delay and therefore, the same is condoned and we proceed to decide the appeal on merits. condoned and we proceed to decide the appeal on merits. 4. The sole grievance of the Revenue in this appeal is against the The sole grievance of the Revenue in this appeal is against the The sole grievance of the Revenue in this appeal

M/S. RMZ INFINITY (CHENNAI) PVT. LTD.,KANCHIPURAM vs. PCIT-4, , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 106 · Page 1 of 6

33
TDS31
Condonation of Delay26
Section 153A24
ITA 511/CHNY/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.511/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2009-10 M/S.Rmz Infinity(Chennai) Pvt. Ltd, The Principal Commissioner Of No.110, Mount Poonamallee Road, Income Tax-4, Porur, Porur S.O, Circle-1, Ltu, Kanchipuram Dist, Chennai Tamil Nadu-600 116. [Pan: Aaacd2287R]

For Appellant: Shri B.Ramakrishnan, F.C.AFor Respondent: Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 263

condone the delay and proceed to adjudicate this appeal. 4.0 Before proceeding further, we would like to place on record the following brief factual matrix of the case narrated by the Ld.Counsel for the assessee. Return of income for AY-2009-10 was filed by the assessee (formerly known as WS Electric Limited) declaring total income Page

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. ABAN OFFSHORE LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1672/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

For Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

condonation of such delay. All these cases are squarely applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. Hence, it is prayed that the appeal may kindly be dismissed. 8. The first issue that came up for our consideration from assessee appeal is Transfer Pricing adjustment towards :-23-: ITA. Nos: 2757/Chny/2017, 1672/Chny/2019, 797 & 798/Chny/2020, IT(TP)A Nos: 21/Chny/2021

ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2757/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

For Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

condonation of such delay. All these cases are squarely applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. Hence, it is prayed that the appeal may kindly be dismissed. 8. The first issue that came up for our consideration from assessee appeal is Transfer Pricing adjustment towards :-23-: ITA. Nos: 2757/Chny/2017, 1672/Chny/2019, 797 & 798/Chny/2020, IT(TP)A Nos: 21/Chny/2021

M/S ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CORPORATE CIRCLE, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 797/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

For Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

condonation of such delay. All these cases are squarely applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. Hence, it is prayed that the appeal may kindly be dismissed. 8. The first issue that came up for our consideration from assessee appeal is Transfer Pricing adjustment towards :-23-: ITA. Nos: 2757/Chny/2017, 1672/Chny/2019, 797 & 798/Chny/2020, IT(TP)A Nos: 21/Chny/2021

M/S. ABAN OFFSHORE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCITCORPORATE CIRCLE1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 798/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A Nos.: 21/Chny/2022 & 40/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Tpo Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 797 & 798/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2757/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon V. Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1672/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aban Offshore Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of V. 113, Janpriya Crestpantheon Income Tax, Road, Egmore, Corporate Circle -1(1), Chennai – 600 008. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaca-3012-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. P. Murali Mohana Rao, Ca Assessee By Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.11.2023

For Respondent: Shri. A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

condonation of such delay. All these cases are squarely applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. Hence, it is prayed that the appeal may kindly be dismissed. 8. The first issue that came up for our consideration from assessee appeal is Transfer Pricing adjustment towards :-23-: ITA. Nos: 2757/Chny/2017, 1672/Chny/2019, 797 & 798/Chny/2020, IT(TP)A Nos: 21/Chny/2021

RAJIV COLLEGE OF EXCELLENCE EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 1433/CHNY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Sept 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1433/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2022-23 Assistant Commissioner Of Rajiv College Of Excellence V. Income Tax (Exemptions), Educational Trust, Chennai – 600 034. 5/516B, Sakthisai Ram Street, Ganapathy Nagar, Alapakkam, Chennai – 600 116. [Pan:Aabtr-0607-B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. M. Karunakaran, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. M.S. Deeptha, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04.09.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha:

For Appellant: Shri. M. Karunakaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. M.S. Deeptha, JCIT
Section 1Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 143Section 143(1)

delay in filing the audit report was condoned by holding as under: “5. The undisputed fact that emerges is that the assessee has filed Audit Report much before the processing of return of income by CPC u/s 143(1). The Audit Report was very much available at the time of processing of return of income. The CPC have not taken

MAHADEVAN RAMAKRISHNAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORP. CIRCLE 6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1570/CHNY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1566, 1567, 1568, 1569 & 1570/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 Late Shri Mahadevan Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Ramakrishnan, Income Tax, Rep. By Legal Heir Smt. Malini Corporate Circle 6(2), Ramakrishnan, Chennai. 46, Rukmani Salai, Kalakshetra Colony, Besant Nagar, Chennai – 600 090. [Pan: Aaapr 8240D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.02.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2024 आदेश/ O R D E R

For Appellant: Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 64

154. Rectification petition could not be submitted online due to nature of rectification involved being a. 26AS income difference due to cash and mercantile system. b. Spouse life interest i.e. settled property clubbed u/s 64 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5) The delay in filing appeal was unintentional and circumstances beyond the appellants control.” The ld.counsel for the assessee

MAHADEVAN RAMAKRISHAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1566/CHNY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Feb 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1566, 1567, 1568, 1569 & 1570/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 Late Shri Mahadevan Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Ramakrishnan, Income Tax, Rep. By Legal Heir Smt. Malini Corporate Circle 6(2), Ramakrishnan, Chennai. 46, Rukmani Salai, Kalakshetra Colony, Besant Nagar, Chennai – 600 090. [Pan: Aaapr 8240D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.02.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2024 आदेश/ O R D E R

For Appellant: Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 64

154. Rectification petition could not be submitted online due to nature of rectification involved being a. 26AS income difference due to cash and mercantile system. b. Spouse life interest i.e. settled property clubbed u/s 64 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5) The delay in filing appeal was unintentional and circumstances beyond the appellants control.” The ld.counsel for the assessee

MAHADEVAN RAMKRISHNAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, COP. CIRCLE 6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1567/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1566, 1567, 1568, 1569 & 1570/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 Late Shri Mahadevan Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Ramakrishnan, Income Tax, Rep. By Legal Heir Smt. Malini Corporate Circle 6(2), Ramakrishnan, Chennai. 46, Rukmani Salai, Kalakshetra Colony, Besant Nagar, Chennai – 600 090. [Pan: Aaapr 8240D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.02.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2024 आदेश/ O R D E R

For Appellant: Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 64

154. Rectification petition could not be submitted online due to nature of rectification involved being a. 26AS income difference due to cash and mercantile system. b. Spouse life interest i.e. settled property clubbed u/s 64 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5) The delay in filing appeal was unintentional and circumstances beyond the appellants control.” The ld.counsel for the assessee

MAHADEVAN RAMAKRISHNAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORP CIRCLE 6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1568/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Feb 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1566, 1567, 1568, 1569 & 1570/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 Late Shri Mahadevan Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Ramakrishnan, Income Tax, Rep. By Legal Heir Smt. Malini Corporate Circle 6(2), Ramakrishnan, Chennai. 46, Rukmani Salai, Kalakshetra Colony, Besant Nagar, Chennai – 600 090. [Pan: Aaapr 8240D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.02.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2024 आदेश/ O R D E R

For Appellant: Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 64

154. Rectification petition could not be submitted online due to nature of rectification involved being a. 26AS income difference due to cash and mercantile system. b. Spouse life interest i.e. settled property clubbed u/s 64 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5) The delay in filing appeal was unintentional and circumstances beyond the appellants control.” The ld.counsel for the assessee

MAHADEVAN RAMAKRISHNAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1569/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Feb 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1566, 1567, 1568, 1569 & 1570/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 Late Shri Mahadevan Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Ramakrishnan, Income Tax, Rep. By Legal Heir Smt. Malini Corporate Circle 6(2), Ramakrishnan, Chennai. 46, Rukmani Salai, Kalakshetra Colony, Besant Nagar, Chennai – 600 090. [Pan: Aaapr 8240D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.02.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2024 आदेश/ O R D E R

For Appellant: Ms. T.V. Muthu Abirami, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 64

154. Rectification petition could not be submitted online due to nature of rectification involved being a. 26AS income difference due to cash and mercantile system. b. Spouse life interest i.e. settled property clubbed u/s 64 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5) The delay in filing appeal was unintentional and circumstances beyond the appellants control.” The ld.counsel for the assessee

SASIKALA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,MADURAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS,, MADURAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 3342/CHNY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Mar 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.3342/Chny/2024 िनधा+रण वष+ /Assessment Year: 2022-23

For Appellant: The assessee is a trust filed its return of income for the AY-2022-23For Respondent: Shri Shivanand K Kalakeri, CIT
Section 11Section 12A(1)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 44A

rectification u/s. 154 but CPC rejected such claim and upheld the adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). In its lengthy grounds of appeal, the appellant has disputed only the rejecting of claim of exemption u/s 11 for non-filing of Form 10B within specified date. As per the provisions

SADISH PAUL,PONDICHERRY vs. DCIT, WARD-1, PUDUCHERRY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 787/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.787/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2017-18 Sadish Paul, Deputy Commissioner Of Income No.19, First Cross, Priyadarshini Nagar, Tax, Gorimedu, Circle-1, Pondicherry-605006 Pondicherry. [Pan: Awxpp6586H) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri N.V.Krishnan, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.Anitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11 .06.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri N.V.Krishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(vi)Section 154

condone the delay and proceed to adjudicate this appeal. 3.0 The only issue contested in the present appeal is the action of Ld.CIT(A) in confirming the addition of Rs. 12 lakhs made by the Ld.AO. At this stage we deem it necessary to narrate brief factual matrix of the case. The assessee is partner in a firm

SRI VETRI VINAYAGAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PUDUKKOTTAI vs. ITO(EXEMPTIONS WARD), TRICHY, TRICHY

The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 903/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.903/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Sri Vetri Vinayagar Educational Trust Ito बनाम/ Vs. No.4/984, Dawood Mill, (Exemptions Ward) Vadaseripatti Road, Pudukottai-622 002. Trichy. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaits-8465-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (!"थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri I. Dinesh (Advocate)- Ld.Ar !"थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V.Sreenivasan (Addl.Cit)-Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07-12-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13-12-2023 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2016-17 Arises Out Of The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 30.05.2023 In The Matter Of A Rectification Intimation Issued By Cpc Bangalore U/S 154 On 07.06.2019. The Grounds Taken By The Assessee Are As Under: 1. The Order Of Cit(A) Upholding The Order U/S.154 Denying Exemption U/S.11 Is Bad In Law & Springs From Mis-Appreciation Of Facts Of The Case.

For Appellant: Shri I. Dinesh (Advocate)- Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri AR.V.Sreenivasan (Addl.CIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 11Section 139Section 143(1)Section 154

rectification intimation issued by CPC Bangalore u/s 154 on 07.06.2019. The grounds taken by the assessee are as under: 1. The order of CIT(A) upholding the order u/s.154 denying exemption u/s.11 is bad in law and springs from mis-appreciation of facts of the case. 2 2. The CIT(A) having taken note of the fact that the Audit

RISE ADVERTISING PVT. LTD.,MADURAI vs. ITO, TDS , MADURAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 251/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.251/Chny/2025 िनधा7रण वष7 /Assessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri J. Saravanan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

delay of 1339 days in filing the appeal , which has been condoned by the Bench vide interim order dated 19-03-2025 after considering the overall facts and substances of the case and Rise Advertising Pvt. Ltd. :- 2 -: noting that assessee has opted for VSVS. It has now been stated that the application for VSVS has been rejected

KELLER (M) SDN BHD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT INTL TAX 1(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1319/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1319/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-2019) Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Keller (M) Sdn Bhd, Income Tax, 7Th Floor, Centennial Square, International Taxation 1(2) No.6A, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. [Pan: Aagck 8014M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Ashik Shah, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit.

For Appellant: Shri. Ashik Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CIT
Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 239Section 263

Rectification order under section 154 of the AO vide order under Act section 154 denied interest under section 244A of the Act IV. Revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Act 15 18-Aug-23 SCN under section 263 of the Act SCN was issued on two issues provision for sub-contracting expense and refund claim 31-Aug-23 Response

THE CUDDALORE DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.,CUDDALORE vs. DCIT CUDDALORE CIRCLE, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2645/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The only issue in this appeal of Revenue is as regards to the order of CIT(A) quashing the reopening initiated u/s.147 r.w.s. 148 of the Act, according to CIT(A) the Revenue could not establish failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly the material facts required

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-I,, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 858/CHNY/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The only issue in this appeal of Revenue is as regards to the order of CIT(A) quashing the reopening initiated u/s.147 r.w.s. 148 of the Act, according to CIT(A) the Revenue could not establish failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly the material facts required

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, CUDDALLORE vs. M/S VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD., VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 981/CHNY/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 3. The only issue in this appeal of Revenue is as regards to the order of CIT(A) quashing the reopening initiated u/s.147 r.w.s. 148 of the Act, according to CIT(A) the Revenue could not establish failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly the material facts required