BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

208 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai327Pune248Chennai208Delhi208Ahmedabad203Kolkata147Jaipur133Surat113Bangalore88Chandigarh49Rajkot41Amritsar40Hyderabad33Lucknow32Indore28Nagpur22Visakhapatnam17Agra13Cochin13Cuttack12Jodhpur11Jabalpur9Raipur8Karnataka8Ranchi6Panaji6Patna5Allahabad3Telangana3Punjab & Haryana2Dehradun1Calcutta1Guwahati1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 80G304Section 80G(5)161Section 12A127Exemption98Section 80G(5)(iii)77Section 80G(5)(iv)75Charitable Trust69Section 1155Section 12A(1)(ac)36

SOCIETY FOR COMMUNITY ORGANISATION AND PEOPLES EDUCATION (SCOPE),TIRUCHIRAPPALLI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1127/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1127/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: - Society For Community Organization Commissioner Of Income Tax & Peoples Education (Scope), (Exemptions), No.17, 16Th Cross, Ahmed Colony, Chennai. Ramalinga Nagar, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu- 620 003. [Pan: Aaets3488C] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri N.Arjun Raj, Advocate, प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03.10.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri N.Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Bipin C.N, CIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

Showing 1–20 of 208 · Page 1 of 11

...
Limitation/Time-bar33
Section 13(1)(c)32
Addition to Income11

PROTECT AND RESCUE ANIMALS IN NEED INITIATIVE (PRANI),CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1151/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1151/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: - Protect & Rescue Animals In Need Commissioner Of Income Tax Initiative (Prani), (Exemptions), No.10, Door No.5, Bnb Flats, Chennai. 6Th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai- 600 083. [Pan: Aaftp0832N] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri M.Viswanathan, C.A. प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03.10.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri M.Viswanathan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Bipin C.N, CIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

ALAMELU MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,THIRUVALLUR vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 814/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.814/Chny/2025 Alamelu Memorial Charitable Trust, Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax No. 46, 2Nd Street, Sp Munusamy [Exemptions], Nagar, Gnt Road, Thervazhi, Chennai. Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur 601 201. [Pan:Aaita6393E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri K. Vishva Padmanabhan, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Nandha Kumar, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 11.03.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai In Rejecting The Application Filed In Form 10Ab Under Clause (Iii) Of First Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri K. Vishva Padmanabhan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri G. Nandha Kumar, CIT
Section 10Section 12ASection 4Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act and its provisional approval also cancelled. 10. We have perused the case law relied on by the ld. AR in the case of M/s. CIT-1982 Charitable Trust

MADURAI AGRI BUSINESS INCUBATION FORUM ,COIMBATORE vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 875/CHNY/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

Section 10Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

Charitable Trust with PAN Number AAUTS0393L filed an application dated 17.03.2023 in Form 10AB under Rule 11AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter the ‘Rules’), seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

ST. GEORGE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1795/CHNY/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 Oct 2024

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Muthu Abirami, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G. 4. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) ought not to have rejected the application made u/s.80G(5) for the only reason that the appellant mentioned the nature of activity of the trust as 'Religious cum Charitable

ARAM HOME FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN GIRLS,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1780/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1780/Chny/2025 Aram Home For Special Children Girls, Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax No. 38/54, 30Th Mgr Street, G.K.M. [Exemptions], Colony, Nawahar Nagar, Konnur, Chennai. Chennai 600 082. [Pan:Aaita5212E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri V. Swaminathan, F.C.A. (Virtual) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Dr. M. Mohan Babu, Addl. Cit For Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 01.12.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 16.06.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai In Rejecting The Application Filed In Form 10Ab Seeking Approval Under Clause (Iii) Of First Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri V. Swaminathan, F.C.A. (virtual)For Respondent: Dr. M. Mohan Babu, Addl. CIT for CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(i)Section 80G(5)(iii)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

KATYA JANANI CHARITABLE TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

In the result, these Writ Petitions are allowed on the following terms: - (i) The clause 5(ii) of Circular No

ITA 883/CHNY/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

SHREE PALANIMURUGAN TRUST,COIMBATORE vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

In the result, these Writ Petitions are allowed on the following terms: - (i) The clause 5(ii) of Circular No

ITA 884/CHNY/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

AGGROW FARMERS DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION,UDHAGAMANDALAM vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

In the result, these Writ Petitions are allowed on the following terms: - (i) The clause 5(ii) of Circular No

ITA 880/CHNY/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

63 NAYANARS CHARITABLE TRUST,TIRUVANNAMALAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1932/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Sept 2025

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay63 Nayanars Charitable Trust, C.I.T. (Exemptions), 3, Girivala Nagar, Adiannamalai, Vs. Chennai. Tiruvannamalai-606604 (Tamil Nadu) Pan No. Aaatz 2750 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 10Section 119Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

Section 80G(5) by the Finance Act, 2024 w.e.f. 01/10/2024 to enable assessee trust to apply for approval u/s 80G(5) at any time after commencement of its activities. This provision is disjoint from clause (iii), which governed the earlier timeline. The ld. CIT(E) has 4 ITA1932/Chny/2025 63 Nayanars Charitable

SUMUNUM FOUNDATION,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1535/CHNY/2023[-]Status: PendingITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar & Smt. S. SreeFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

SUMUNUM FOUNDATION,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1536/CHNY/2023[-]Status: PendingITAT Chennai13 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar & Smt. S. SreeFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

THARAMANI FRIENDS WELFARE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS) CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 1580/CHNY/2023[--]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 May 2024

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1580/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: - V. Tharamani Friends Welfare Trust, The Commissioner – No.8, Rajaji Street, Of Income Tax (Exemption), Tharamani, Chennai. Chennai-600 113. [Pan: Aaett 1610 M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT
Section 10ASection 12Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(i)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

SUNSHINE EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CUDDALORE vs. ITO,EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 750/CHNY/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.750/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: - V. Sunshine Educational Trust, The Income Tax Officer, No.8A, Daily Bazaar, Block No.19, Exemption Ward-2, Neyveli, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore Chennai. District, Neyveli Cuddalore, Block 18, Neyveli S.O. Pin-607 803 [Pan: Aawts 7853 B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P.M.Katir, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts

HINDU EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION,KANCHIPURAM vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 1144/CHNY/2023[--]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

Charitable Trust with PAN Number AAZTS0409C filed an application dated 01.02.2023 in Form 10AB under Rule 11AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter the ‘Rules’), seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

CVMV REDDY'S EDUCATIONAL & PUBLIC CHARTIABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 1146/CHNY/2023[---]Status: PendingITAT Chennai20 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

Charitable Trust with PAN Number AAZTS0409C filed an application dated 01.02.2023 in Form 10AB under Rule 11AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter the ‘Rules’), seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

SRI LAKSHMANACHARYA CHARITABLE TRUST,VILLUPURAM vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 1143/CHNY/2023[--]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

Charitable Trust with PAN Number AAZTS0409C filed an application dated 01.02.2023 in Form 10AB under Rule 11AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter the ‘Rules’), seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

SRI VISHNU MOHAN FOUNDATION,CHENNAI vs. CIT-EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 1455/CHNY/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

Charitable Trust with PAN Number AAZTS0409C filed an application dated 01.02.2023 in Form 10AB under Rule 11AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter the ‘Rules’), seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

ASIAN FOUNDATION,KARUR vs. CIT,(EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 1230/CHNY/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

Charitable Trust with PAN Number AAZTS0409C filed an application dated 01.02.2023 in Form 10AB under Rule 11AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter the ‘Rules’), seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

SRI SASTHA CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTION,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 839/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Sept 2025

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 839/Chny/2025 M/S. Sri Sastha Charitable The Commissioner Of Trust, Vs. Income Tax (Exemption), No.10, 2Nd Floor, Chennai. Duraiswamy Pillai Street, West Tambaram, Chennai – 600 045. Pan: Aazts 0449L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. Sonali Kothari, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Shiva Srinivas, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02.09.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 03.09.2025

For Appellant: Ms. Sonali Kothari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 10Section 119Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Charitable The Commissioner of Trust, Vs. Income Tax (Exemption), No.10, 2nd Floor, Chennai. Duraiswamy Pillai Street, West Tambaram, Chennai – 600 045. PAN: AAZTS 0449L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant by : Ms. Sonali Kothari, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by : Shri Shiva Srinivas, CIT सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 02.09.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date