BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur14Chennai8Amritsar6Ahmedabad5Agra4Chandigarh4Mumbai4Bangalore3Delhi3Kolkata2Surat1

Key Topics

Section 12A12Section 1112Section 1328Section 13(1)8Section 69B4Section 143(3)4Section 153A4Charitable Trust4Addition to Income4Exemption

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2219/CHNY/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. A. Mahesh, C.A
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 132Section 153A

section 13(1) (c) of the Act" When the AD has concluded that he has to treat the cash refunds as withdrawals for the purpose of college expenses, merely because proof adduced for such expenses is 'treated as not genuine' by the AO, cannot automatically lead to the conclusion of violation of sec.13(1)(c), unless

4

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2220/CHNY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. A. Mahesh, C.A
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 132Section 153A

section 13(1) (c) of the Act" When the AD has concluded that he has to treat the cash refunds as withdrawals for the purpose of college expenses, merely because proof adduced for such expenses is 'treated as not genuine' by the AO, cannot automatically lead to the conclusion of violation of sec.13(1)(c), unless

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2125/CHNY/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. A. Mahesh, C.A
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 132Section 153A

section 13(1) (c) of the Act" When the AD has concluded that he has to treat the cash refunds as withdrawals for the purpose of college expenses, merely because proof adduced for such expenses is 'treated as not genuine' by the AO, cannot automatically lead to the conclusion of violation of sec.13(1)(c), unless

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2126/CHNY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

For Appellant: Shri. A. Mahesh, C.A
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 132Section 153A

section 13(1) (c) of the Act" When the AD has concluded that he has to treat the cash refunds as withdrawals for the purpose of college expenses, merely because proof adduced for such expenses is 'treated as not genuine' by the AO, cannot automatically lead to the conclusion of violation of sec.13(1)(c), unless

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MADURAI vs. THEVANESAM ERUDHAYA AMMAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 230/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Dr. M. Srinivasa Rao, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Ms. K. Hemalatha, CA
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 69B

69B of the 2 I.T.A. Nos. 228-231/Chny/18 Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] in the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act in all the above assessment years. 2. All the appeals filed by the Revenue are delayed by three days, for which, the Revenue has filed petition for condonation of the delay

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MADURAI vs. THEVANESAM ERUDHAYA AMMAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 231/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Dr. M. Srinivasa Rao, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Ms. K. Hemalatha, CA
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 69B

69B of the 2 I.T.A. Nos. 228-231/Chny/18 Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] in the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act in all the above assessment years. 2. All the appeals filed by the Revenue are delayed by three days, for which, the Revenue has filed petition for condonation of the delay

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MADURAI vs. THEVANESAM ERUDHAYA AMMAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 228/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Dr. M. Srinivasa Rao, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Ms. K. Hemalatha, CA
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 69B

69B of the 2 I.T.A. Nos. 228-231/Chny/18 Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] in the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act in all the above assessment years. 2. All the appeals filed by the Revenue are delayed by three days, for which, the Revenue has filed petition for condonation of the delay

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MADURAI vs. THEVANESAM ERUDHAYA AMMAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 229/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Dr. M. Srinivasa Rao, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Ms. K. Hemalatha, CA
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 69B

69B of the 2 I.T.A. Nos. 228-231/Chny/18 Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] in the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act in all the above assessment years. 2. All the appeals filed by the Revenue are delayed by three days, for which, the Revenue has filed petition for condonation of the delay